Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Autonomous emergency braking optimal coordination control strategy for commercial buses considering safety and comfort

  1. 1School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
  2. 2Tsingte Group Co., Ltd, Qingdao, China

Abstract

The traditional dual-stage warning and dual-grade braking autonomous emergency braking (AEB) control strategy has sudden change in the expected braking deceleration during the switch of working state, which will easily lead to significant longitudinal jerk of the vehicle and affect ride comfort during emergency braking. To solve this problem, an AEB optimal control strategy considering coordination safety and comfort is proposed. First, an in improved Time-To-Collision pre-estimation model was designed, and the AEB state threshold time determination method was proposed by combining vehicle braking process and driver emergency braking characteristics. Second, an AEB hierarchical control strategy was designed, the upper layer designed an expected braking deceleration optimal decision controller based on particle swarm optimization linear quadratic regulator (PSO-LQR), and introduced a comfort time compensation coefficient to rectification the PSO-LQR controller. Moreover, an expected braking deceleration tracking controller based on feedforward and robust integral sliding mode feedback control was designed in the lower layer. Next, an AEB software architecture based on AUTOSAR was designed to enhance the standardization of control strategy software code generation. Finally, the Hardware-in-the-loop test and real vehicle experimental results indicate that the proposed AEB optimal coordination control strategy can meet the safety requirements of emergency collision avoidance functions, and effectively reduce the longitudinal jerk compared to the traditional AEB control strategy, it significantly improves the ride comfort of commercial buses during emergency braking processes.

Related

  1. Emergency Pulsed-Field Ablation as a Bail-Out Strategy for Refractory Incessant VT
    Pierre Ollitrault, Jonaz Font, Alina Denisenko +6
    JACC: Case ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND1 citedCardiovascular medicineHAL
  2. Governance, coordination, and accountability in public health emergency preparedness and response: A scoping review
    Sileshi Demelash Sasie, Melkamu Asrat Alava, Lensa Fekadu +4
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  3. Receipt of needed care coordination and emergency department utilization among US children with chronic physical pain: a pooled analysis of the 2022-2024 National Survey of Children's Health.
    Tongming Cheng, Ziming Cai, Xiaonan Zhou +3
    Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
  4. PBPK Model-Based Prediction of Optimal Rosuvastatin Dosing with Concomitant Ticagrelor in Elderly Patients Considering ABCG2 Genetic Variant.
    D. H. Nguyen, H. T. V. Pham, J. Ding +1
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPharmacology & toxicologymedRxiv
  5. Evaluating the Association Between PPI Use and Dementia Risk Considering Methodological Choices: An Updated Meta‐Analysis
    Heonyoung Ha, Hyun Woo Lee, Jae‐Eun Park +3
    Clinical Pharmacology and TherapeuticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
BibTeX
@article{gao2026autonomous,
  title = {{Autonomous emergency braking optimal coordination control strategy for commercial buses considering safety and comfort}},
  author = {Shoulin Gao and Xingyu Liu and Jianlong Hu and Chaohui Yang and Zewen Yang and Kai Jiang},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0357272},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357272},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Autonomous emergency braking optimal coordination control strategy for commercial buses considering safety and comfort
AU  - Shoulin Gao
AU  - Xingyu Liu
AU  - Jianlong Hu
AU  - Chaohui Yang
AU  - Zewen Yang
AU  - Kai Jiang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/11
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0357272
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0357272
AB  - The traditional dual-stage warning and dual-grade braking autonomous emergency braking (AEB) control strategy has sudden change in the expected braking deceleration during the switch of working state, which will easily lead to significant longitudinal jerk of the vehicle and affect ride comfort during emergency braking. To solve this problem, an AEB optimal control strategy considering coordination safety and comfort is proposed. First, an in improved Time-To-Collision pre-estimation model was designed, and the AEB state threshold time determination method was proposed by combining vehicle braking process and driver emergency braking characteristics. Second, an AEB hierarchical control strategy was designed, the upper layer designed an expected braking deceleration optimal decision controller based on particle swarm optimization linear quadratic regulator (PSO-LQR), and introduced a comfort time compensation coefficient to rectification the PSO-LQR controller. Moreover, an expected braking deceleration tracking controller based on feedforward and robust integral sliding mode feedback control was designed in the lower layer. Next, an AEB software architecture based on AUTOSAR was designed to enhance the standardization of control strategy software code generation. Finally, the Hardware-in-the-loop test and real vehicle experimental results indicate that the proposed AEB optimal coordination control strategy can meet the safety requirements of emergency collision avoidance functions, and effectively reduce the longitudinal jerk compared to the traditional AEB control strategy, it significantly improves the ride comfort of commercial buses during emergency braking processes.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -