Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYF1000Research

From Compliance-Based to Collaborative Financial Governance: A Bibliometric-Systematic Review of Multi-Actor Accountability in Public Financial Management.

  1. 1Faculty of Administrative Sciences, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, 65145, Indonesia.

Abstract

Public financial management has increasingly moved beyond a narrow compliance-oriented perspective toward broader governance arrangements involving transparency, oversight, participation, digitalization, and multiple accountability actors. This study maps the development of research on public financial management and formulates a conceptual agenda for collaborative financial governance. A bibliometric-systematic literature review was conducted using Scopus-indexed journal articles published in English between 2022 and 2026. After database filtering and eligibility screening, 265 articles were retained for bibliometric performance analysis and science mapping using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. A second-stage screening identified 39 studies with direct thematic relevance for the systematic review and in-depth full-text thematic synthesis. Publication output increased markedly after 2023 and peaked in 2025. Fiscal transparency, local government, accountability, budget transparency, audit, oversight, participation, public spending, and digital openness emerged as dominant and interconnected themes. The systematic synthesis indicates a shift from primarily compliance-based approaches toward broader multi-actor accountability and identifies six recurring governance domains: compliance, audit, transparency, participation, digitalization, and accountability. Collaborative financial governance is conceptualized as an integrated governance architecture in which these six domains operate as complementary mechanisms. The framework extends conventional public financial management by linking institutional control, fiscal openness, stakeholder involvement, digital support, and accountability to strengthen the legitimacy, responsiveness, and effectiveness of public resource management.

Related

  1. Transparency, accountability, and scholarly integrity: A systematic narrative review of artificial intelligence governance frameworks in healthcare publication
    Amina Silva, Bruna Canever, Monica Lino +1
    PLOS Digital HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyEcologyPLOSEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. Governance, coordination, and accountability in public health emergency preparedness and response: A scoping review
    Sileshi Demelash Sasie, Melkamu Asrat Alava, Lensa Fekadu +4
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  3. Governance-aware autonomous retail coordination in artificial intelligence cities using multi-agent reinforcement learning, blockchain accountability, and federated learning.
    Toqeer Ali Syed, Ali Akarma, Shahid Kamal +3
    Frontiers in artificial intelligencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  4. Health Administration, Regulatory Governance, and Clinical Operations Research Compendium: Privacy Compliance, Revenue Cycle Integrity, and Workforce Optimization
    Robert Hicks
    ZenodoPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textZenodo
  5. Collaborative Governance Mechanisms for Digital Technology Adoption in the Shipping Industry Under ESG Constraint
    Xinyi Qi, Guangnian Xiao, Lang Xu
    SustainabilityPeer-reviewedCC BY9 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{saimima2026from,
  title = {{From Compliance-Based to Collaborative Financial Governance: A Bibliometric-Systematic Review of Multi-Actor Accountability in Public Financial Management.}},
  author = {Simon Saimima and Andy Fefta Wijaya and Endah Setyowati and Benny Hutahayan},
  journal = {F1000Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.12688/f1000research.187613.2},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999050},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - From Compliance-Based to Collaborative Financial Governance: A Bibliometric-Systematic Review of Multi-Actor Accountability in Public Financial Management.
AU  - Simon Saimima
AU  - Andy Fefta Wijaya
AU  - Endah Setyowati
AU  - Benny Hutahayan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - F1000Research
DO  - 10.12688/f1000research.187613.2
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999050
AB  - Public financial management has increasingly moved beyond a narrow compliance-oriented perspective toward broader governance arrangements involving transparency, oversight, participation, digitalization, and multiple accountability actors. This study maps the development of research on public financial management and formulates a conceptual agenda for collaborative financial governance. A bibliometric-systematic literature review was conducted using Scopus-indexed journal articles published in English between 2022 and 2026. After database filtering and eligibility screening, 265 articles were retained for bibliometric performance analysis and science mapping using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. A second-stage screening identified 39 studies with direct thematic relevance for the systematic review and in-depth full-text thematic synthesis. Publication output increased markedly after 2023 and peaked in 2025. Fiscal transparency, local government, accountability, budget transparency, audit, oversight, participation, public spending, and digital openness emerged as dominant and interconnected themes. The systematic synthesis indicates a shift from primarily compliance-based approaches toward broader multi-actor accountability and identifies six recurring governance domains: compliance, audit, transparency, participation, digitalization, and accountability. Collaborative financial governance is conceptualized as an integrated governance architecture in which these six domains operate as complementary mechanisms. The framework extends conventional public financial management by linking institutional control, fiscal openness, stakeholder involvement, digital support, and accountability to strengthen the legitimacy, responsiveness, and effectiveness of public resource management.
SN  - 2046-1402
ER  -