Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NDmedRxiv

Six recommendations for improving care and support in advanced COPD: evidenced from a population-based, mixed method, multiple-perspective, longitudinal study

  1. 1University of East Anglia

Abstract

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive condition with high symptom burden. Advanced COPD management should relieve symptoms, optimise daily functioning and reduce carer burden, yet there is limited enactment of policy-advocated person-centred approaches to care and support. The Living with Breathlessness Study sought to establish evidence-based recommendations to inform a new paradigm to improve care and support in advanced COPD.

MethodsComprehensive multiple-perspective longitudinal evidence was collected on care, support, functioning and needs in advanced COPD from a population-based cohort of over 500 patients, their unpaid/family carers and health care professionals through semi-structured interviews and validated outcome measures over an 18-month period. Quantitative data analysed using standard descriptive statistics, numerical and univariate analyses, and qualitative data using a Framework approach.

Recommendations were then generated through three linked strategies: (1) an expert multidisciplinary group, (2) a stakeholder workshop and (3) a stakeholder survey.

ResultsSix inter-related recommendations emerged, linked by the concept of proactive person-centred care, supported by action points to enable delivery. Recommendations in brief: (1) stop focusing on the challenge of prognostication as a barrier to meeting need, (2) change targets to incentivise person-centred care, (3) enable identification of patient support needs, (4) identify and support carers, (5) identify and respond to psychological morbidity, (6) change societal understandings of COPD, breathlessness, palliative care and informal carers. The recommendations garnered significant support from stakeholders, with caution regarding ease of implementation.

ConclusionsEnactment of the resulting six evidence-based recommendations, through their action points, could inform a new paradigm to improve care and support in advanced COPD recognising the slow relentless progression of non-malignant disease, and its effect on patients and their carers. They hold potential for other patients and unpaid/family carers who are living in between conventional disease management and end-of-life care, and for those HCPs striving to support them.

Related

  1. Participant Experiences and Recommendations for Improving Eat Well, Be Well, Rhode Island’s Statewide Retail SNAP Incentive Program: a Qualitative​ Study
    Yelena Malyuta, Tamar Wolfson, A. Maximillian Erbe +5
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Recommendations for microbiological sampling in infected hard-to-heal wounds: an Italian association for cutaneous ulcers (AIUC) perspective
    Sara Carella, Barbara De Angelis, Barbara Nardi +9
    Frontiers in surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Invited Perspective: Improving Our Approach to Studies of Outdoor Artificial Light at Night and Cancer Risk
    Parveen Bhatti, Manolis Kogevinas
    Environmental health perspectivesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  4. Recommendations for the Management of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension With Spinal Longitudinal Epidural CSF Collection
    Soyoun Choi, Ian Carroll, Deborah I. Friedman +9
    NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyPMC
  5. Regional one-step and two-step gestational diabetes screening recommendations and birthweight outcomes in Belgium: A population-based controlled before-after study.
    Elena Costa, Christophe de Meester, An Vercoutere +6
    European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: XPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{farquhar2026recommendations,
  title = {{Six recommendations for improving care and support in advanced COPD: evidenced from a population-based, mixed method, multiple-perspective, longitudinal study}},
  author = {M. Farquhar and G. Ewing and C. Moore and C. Gardener and H. Holt Butcher and P. Burge and T. Ling and Living with Breathlessness Study Team},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.29.26364287},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.26364287v1},
  note = {CC BY-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Six recommendations for improving care and support in advanced COPD: evidenced from a population-based, mixed method, multiple-perspective, longitudinal study
AU  - M. Farquhar
AU  - G. Ewing
AU  - C. Moore
AU  - C. Gardener
AU  - H. Holt Butcher
AU  - P. Burge
AU  - T. Ling
AU  - Living with Breathlessness Study Team
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.29.26364287
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.29.26364287v1
AB  - BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive condition with high symptom burden. Advanced COPD management should relieve symptoms, optimise daily functioning and reduce carer burden, yet there is limited enactment of policy-advocated person-centred approaches to care and support. The Living with Breathlessness Study sought to establish evidence-based recommendations to inform a new paradigm to improve care and support in advanced COPD.  MethodsComprehensive multiple-perspective longitudinal evidence was collected on care, support, functioning and needs in advanced COPD from a population-based cohort of over 500 patients, their unpaid/family carers and health care professionals through semi-structured interviews and validated outcome measures over an 18-month period. Quantitative data analysed using standard descriptive statistics, numerical and univariate analyses, and qualitative data using a Framework approach.  Recommendations were then generated through three linked strategies: (1) an expert multidisciplinary group, (2) a stakeholder workshop and (3) a stakeholder survey.  ResultsSix inter-related recommendations emerged, linked by the concept of proactive person-centred care, supported by action points to enable delivery. Recommendations in brief: (1) stop focusing on the challenge of prognostication as a barrier to meeting need, (2) change targets to incentivise person-centred care, (3) enable identification of patient support needs, (4) identify and support carers, (5) identify and respond to psychological morbidity, (6) change societal understandings of COPD, breathlessness, palliative care and informal carers. The recommendations garnered significant support from stakeholders, with caution regarding ease of implementation.  ConclusionsEnactment of the resulting six evidence-based recommendations, through their action points, could inform a new paradigm to improve care and support in advanced COPD recognising the slow relentless progression of non-malignant disease, and its effect on patients and their carers. They hold potential for other patients and unpaid/family carers who are living in between conventional disease management and end-of-life care, and for those HCPs striving to support them.
ER  -