Toward the Use of Centrifugation for Point-of-Care Plasma Separation: Evaluation of a Compact Battery-Powered Centrifuge.
- 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Despite advances in point-of-care (POC) blood test development, the lack of a simple, low-cost approach to the separation of capillary blood to generate liquid plasma remains a barrier to POC measurement of many analytes. The battery-operated, internally balanced Labcorp TrueSpin® centrifuge offers a potential POC solution for blood collected into a BDMicrotainer®. We compared the quality of plasma generated by TrueSpin centrifugation versus conventional centrifugation. Methods: Venipuncture was performed on 10 volunteers. After collection of blood into Sarstedt Monovettes® (Lithium Heparin with gel (LiHep/Gel), EDTA), blood from the same tubing was collected into three Microtainers (LiHep/gel, LiHep without gel (LiHep), EDTA). Microtainer and Monovette samples received TrueSpin and conventional centrifugation, respectively. Hemolysis index and plasma amino acids (n = 24) were measured for all Monovette and Microtainer plasma samples. For 3 additional volunteers, capillary blood was collected from the arm into LiHep/Gel and EDTA Microtainers using the Labcorp Comfort DrawTM device with a gentleheel® lancet and centrifuged (TrueSpin) to generate plasma. Results: TrueSpin centrifugation took approximately 10 min; batteries supported 8-11 runs. Microtainer plasma H-indices (including blood from Comfort Draw) were ≤10. For all 24 amino acids combined, measurements for TrueSpin Microtainer samples had excellent Pearson's correlation (r > 0.99) with paired conventional Monovette plasma. Conclusions: Plasma quality after TrueSpin centrifugation of Microtainer blood samples is comparable to plasma quality after conventional Monovette centrifugation, including for capillary blood collected using the Comfort Draw. The TrueSpin was reliable and easy to use. The TrueSpin centrifuge has potential future use for POC plasma separation.
Related
- Randomized non-inferiority within-patient trial of density gradient processing of sequential ejaculates versus centrifugation-free sperm separation device for ICSI in men with elevated sperm DNA fragmentation- study protocol
- Performance Assessment of Centrifugation-Based Hematocrit Testing in Primary Care Units: Evidence from Seventy-Two Proficiency Testing Datasets over Eight Years
- Quality control of red cell components in a tertiary blood center: Evaluation of automated separation, leukoreduction, and irradiation.
- Dual asymmetric centrifugation to prepare cosmetic emulsions and creams: Physico‐chemical and energy considerations
- Effects of centrifugation-based therapeutic plasma exchange on coagulation parameters in dogs with canine visceral leishmaniasis.
BibTeX
@article{ptolemy2026toward,
title = {{Toward the Use of Centrifugation for Point-of-Care Plasma Separation: Evaluation of a Compact Battery-Powered Centrifuge.}},
author = {Adam S Ptolemy and Alexander L Kolb and Ayse Mehmke and Sami Rifai and Nira R Pollock},
journal = {Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3390/diagnostics16193088},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882243},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Toward the Use of Centrifugation for Point-of-Care Plasma Separation: Evaluation of a Compact Battery-Powered Centrifuge.
AU - Adam S Ptolemy
AU - Alexander L Kolb
AU - Ayse Mehmke
AU - Sami Rifai
AU - Nira R Pollock
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/24
JO - Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics16193088
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882243
AB - Background/Objectives: Despite advances in point-of-care (POC) blood test development, the lack of a simple, low-cost approach to the separation of capillary blood to generate liquid plasma remains a barrier to POC measurement of many analytes. The battery-operated, internally balanced Labcorp TrueSpin® centrifuge offers a potential POC solution for blood collected into a BDMicrotainer®. We compared the quality of plasma generated by TrueSpin centrifugation versus conventional centrifugation. Methods: Venipuncture was performed on 10 volunteers. After collection of blood into Sarstedt Monovettes® (Lithium Heparin with gel (LiHep/Gel), EDTA), blood from the same tubing was collected into three Microtainers (LiHep/gel, LiHep without gel (LiHep), EDTA). Microtainer and Monovette samples received TrueSpin and conventional centrifugation, respectively. Hemolysis index and plasma amino acids (n = 24) were measured for all Monovette and Microtainer plasma samples. For 3 additional volunteers, capillary blood was collected from the arm into LiHep/Gel and EDTA Microtainers using the Labcorp Comfort DrawTM device with a gentleheel® lancet and centrifuged (TrueSpin) to generate plasma. Results: TrueSpin centrifugation took approximately 10 min; batteries supported 8-11 runs. Microtainer plasma H-indices (including blood from Comfort Draw) were ≤10. For all 24 amino acids combined, measurements for TrueSpin Microtainer samples had excellent Pearson's correlation (r > 0.99) with paired conventional Monovette plasma. Conclusions: Plasma quality after TrueSpin centrifugation of Microtainer blood samples is comparable to plasma quality after conventional Monovette centrifugation, including for capillary blood collected using the Comfort Draw. The TrueSpin was reliable and easy to use. The TrueSpin centrifuge has potential future use for POC plasma separation.
SN - 2075-4418
ER -