Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 21 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Inequity in HPV school-based vaccination programmes: A COM-B synthesis in disadvantaged communities

Abstract

Background: The WHO aims for 90% HPV vaccination coverage by 2030 to eliminate cervical cancer. However, significant disparities persist, particularly in disadvantaged communities within high-income countries. Inequities in these populations remain insufficiently researched and poorly understood. This narrative review synthesised evidence on barriers, facilitators, and interventions to improve HPV vaccination uptake in school-based programmes within disadvantaged communities.

Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, and backward citation searching identified English-language studies published within the past 10 years. Findings were thematically mapped onto the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour).

Results: Fifteen articles examined barriers and facilitators: (1) Capability-Barriers: primarily limited parental and adolescent knowledge and awareness of HPV and the vaccine; (2) Capability-Facilitators: user-friendly resources and increased adolescent awareness; (3) Opportunity-Barriers: poor communication and information delivery, socioeconomic hardships, logistical challenges, and cultural/ethnic influences; (4) Opportunity-Facilitators: simplified consent processes, multi-channel promotion methods, proactive follow-up, strong school-parent relationships; (5) Motivation-Barriers: safety concerns and fears of side effects; (6) Motivation-Facilitators: positive attitudes, trust in healthcare providers, and perceived vaccine benefits. Seven studies evaluated interventions, with the most successful approaches combining integrated education with culturally and contextually tailored strategies and repeated reminders.

Conclusions: HPV vaccination disparities in disadvantaged communities are driven by a complex interplay of limited awareness and structural barriers. Education alone is insufficient to bridge the equity gap. School-based programmes should prioritise reducing logistical friction and reinforcing community trust alongside educational outreach.

Key messages: • Direct, culturally and linguistically appropriate information can reduce knowledge gaps, address misconceptions, support consent, and build trust between families, schools, and healthcare providers.

• Effective programmes should adapt to community needs through flexible consent processes, reminders, trusted local stakeholders, and culturally responsive delivery to improve uptake and equity.

Related

  1. Enjoy Life LocallY (ELLY): A qualitative study of a co-designed healthy weight and wellbeing intervention in two disadvantaged Scottish communities
    Julie Cowie, Rhonda Archibald, Scott Findlay +4
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionPLOS
  2. International School-Based HPV Vaccination Programmes: A Comparative Analysis and Recommendations for Adaptation to the French Context.
    Sarah Soupey, Laure Hermet
    VaccinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  3. Developing an outcomes framework for greenspace programmes supporting individuals experiencing problem substance use: a scoping review and analytical synthesis
    Danilo Falzon, Wendy Masterton, Hannah Carver +8
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  4. Facilitators and barriers influencing the implementation of type 2 diabetes remission programmes: a qualitative meta-synthesis from a multi-stakeholder perspective
    Songna Jin, Linyue Tan, Qiuhong Zhou +2
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  5. Vaccination effectiveness under risk-adapted outbreak response in two Roma communities, Portugal
    I F Medeiros, E A Matias, I C Gonçalves +5
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ngo2026inequity,
  title = {{Inequity in HPV school-based vaccination programmes: A COM-B synthesis in disadvantaged communities}},
  author = {UTH Ngo and N Clarke and E Mc Laughlin and M Mohan and A Le Bonnie},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1791},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1791},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Inequity in HPV school-based vaccination programmes: A COM-B synthesis in disadvantaged communities
AU  - UTH Ngo
AU  - N Clarke
AU  - E Mc Laughlin
AU  - M Mohan
AU  - A Le Bonnie
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1791
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1791
AB  - Background: The WHO aims for 90% HPV vaccination coverage by 2030 to eliminate cervical cancer. However, significant disparities persist, particularly in disadvantaged communities within high-income countries. Inequities in these populations remain insufficiently researched and poorly understood. This narrative review synthesised evidence on barriers, facilitators, and interventions to improve HPV vaccination uptake in school-based programmes within disadvantaged communities.  Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, and backward citation searching identified English-language studies published within the past 10 years. Findings were thematically mapped onto the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour).  Results: Fifteen articles examined barriers and facilitators: (1) Capability-Barriers: primarily limited parental and adolescent knowledge and awareness of HPV and the vaccine; (2) Capability-Facilitators: user-friendly resources and increased adolescent awareness; (3) Opportunity-Barriers: poor communication and information delivery, socioeconomic hardships, logistical challenges, and cultural/ethnic influences; (4) Opportunity-Facilitators: simplified consent processes, multi-channel promotion methods, proactive follow-up, strong school-parent relationships; (5) Motivation-Barriers: safety concerns and fears of side effects; (6) Motivation-Facilitators: positive attitudes, trust in healthcare providers, and perceived vaccine benefits. Seven studies evaluated interventions, with the most successful approaches combining integrated education with culturally and contextually tailored strategies and repeated reminders.  Conclusions: HPV vaccination disparities in disadvantaged communities are driven by a complex interplay of limited awareness and structural barriers. Education alone is insufficient to bridge the equity gap. School-based programmes should prioritise reducing logistical friction and reinforcing community trust alongside educational outreach.  Key messages: • Direct, culturally and linguistically appropriate information can reduce knowledge gaps, address misconceptions, support consent, and build trust between families, schools, and healthcare providers.  • Effective programmes should adapt to community needs through flexible consent processes, reminders, trusted local stakeholders, and culturally responsive delivery to improve uptake and equity.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -