Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Supermassive charged gravitinos and the Lux-Zeplin event

Abstract

The Lux-Zeplin collaboration recently reported one unusual event which was interpreted as first evidence for a WIMP (arXiv:2609.02823[hep-ex]). In this note we offer an alternative explanation of this event, following our earlier proposal that dark matter could consist of fractionally charged supermassive gravitinos. A main difference between the two interpretations is that one expects small cross sections and large flux rates for WIMPs, whereas it is the opposite for supermassive gravitinos, namely large (electromagnetic) cross sections and very low flux rates. The observed nuclear recoil energy of about 250 keV and the occurrence of one event in one year fit well with the estimates quoted in (K.A. Meissner, H.~Nicolai, Eur.Phys.J.C 84 (2024) 3, 269). A main characteristic of the new interpretation distinguishing it unequivocally from the WIMP hypothesis would be the sequential occurrence of two or more recoils within a few microseconds along the gravitino's straight trajectory, a prediction that remains to be checked. Such a measurement would also allow to overcome the `neutrino floor'. In this note we refine our previous estimates and propose some extra steps so as to enable the experiment to discriminate between the WIMP and gravitino hypotheses.

Related

  1. Inelastic Dark Matter from a Higher-Dimensional Operator: The LUX-ZEPLIN High-Recoil Event and Thermal Relic
    Debajyoti Choudhury, Jaydeb Das, Divya Sachdeva
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. Inelastic B−L scalar dark matter and the LUX-ZEPLIN event
    Nobuchika Okada, Osamu Seto
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full text29 citedHigh-energy & particle physicsarXivOpenAlex
  3. Higgsino dark matter in the Starobinsky supergravity with the MSSM in light of the LUX-ZEPLIN event
    Daniel Frolovsky, Sergei V. Ketov
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  4. Higgsino Dark Matter Interpretation of the LUX-ZEPLIN 248 keV Nuclear-Recoil Event
    Katherine Freese, Dionysios P. Theodosopoulos
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full text88 citedCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXivOpenAlex
  5. The Inert Doublet Model of Dark Matter and the LUX-ZEPLIN High-Recoil Event
    Lei Wang, Yang Xiao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull text34 citedHigh-energy & particle physicsarXivOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{meissner2026supermassive,
  title = {{Supermassive charged gravitinos and the Lux-Zeplin event}},
  author = {Krzysztof A. Meissner and Hermann Nicolai},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.39529},
  eprint = {2609.39529},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39529},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Supermassive charged gravitinos and the Lux-Zeplin event
AU  - Krzysztof A. Meissner
AU  - Hermann Nicolai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.39529
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39529
AB  - The Lux-Zeplin collaboration recently reported one unusual event which was interpreted as first evidence for a WIMP (arXiv:2609.02823[hep-ex]). In this note we offer an alternative explanation of this event, following our earlier proposal that dark matter could consist of fractionally charged supermassive gravitinos. A main difference between the two interpretations is that one expects small cross sections and large flux rates for WIMPs, whereas it is the opposite for supermassive gravitinos, namely large (electromagnetic) cross sections and very low flux rates. The observed nuclear recoil energy of about 250 keV and the occurrence of one event in one year fit well with the estimates quoted in (K.A. Meissner, H.~Nicolai, Eur.Phys.J.C 84 (2024) 3, 269). A main characteristic of the new interpretation distinguishing it unequivocally from the WIMP hypothesis would be the sequential occurrence of two or more recoils within a few microseconds along the gravitino's straight trajectory, a prediction that remains to be checked. Such a measurement would also allow to overcome the `neutrino floor'. In this note we refine our previous estimates and propose some extra steps so as to enable the experiment to discriminate between the WIMP and gravitino hypotheses.
ER  -