Modified use of the Triflo II® incentive spirometer and its effects on feedback ball elevation, selective closure of air inlets, and inspiratory flow and pressure: A bench study
- 1Department of Physical Therapy, Khon Kaen Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
- 2Centre of Integrative Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences (CIPTHM), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
- 3School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Abstract
Background: The Triflo II® incentive spirometer (TF) is widely prescribed for lung expansion exercise, but its high inspiratory flow rate and short inspiratory time, leading to increased effort and lower tidal volume, are recognized limitations. Modifying its use may improve its effectiveness.
Objectives: As an initial step before human studies, a bench test was conducted to evaluate inspiratory flow and pressure responses under controlled conditions.
Materials and methods: A bench test was conducted under two conditions: (1) three target ball elevation levels were marked on the wall of each TF chamber, and airflow rate and pressure responses were evaluated during simulated airflow at each target level; and (2) selective closure of air inlets was performed by closing one or two of the three air inlet holes of the TF device, and the corresponding airflow rate and pressure responses were evaluated.
Results: No significant differences were observed in the 900 mL/sec chamber. In the 600 mL/sec chamber, the fourth quarter had a significantly higher flow rate (652±6 mL/sec) than the second (605±5 mL/sec, p<0.001) and third (601±8 mL/sec, p<0.001). Similarly, in the 1200 mL/sec chamber, the fourth quarter (994±13 mL/sec) had a significantly higher flow rate than the second (917±8 mL/sec, p<0.001) and third (914±7 mL/sec, p<0.001). Closing the second and third air inlet holes while lifting the 600 mL/sec ball produced the lowest inspiratory flow rate (432±15 mL/sec) and pressure (-4.0±0.3 cm H₂O) among conditions.
Conclusion: Feedback ball elevation influenced inspiratory flow and pressure in the 600 and 1200 mL/sec chambers, whereas no significant differences were observed in the 900 mL/sec chamber. Selective closure of air inlets, particularly closure of two inlets, markedly reduced inspiratory flow and pressure. Further in vivo studies in human subjects are warranted to validate these findings.
Related
- Effects of a sepsis care incentive policy on emergency treatment outcomes: a nationwide cohort study
- Deficient Monetary Reward Processing in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis and Computational Modeling of a Monetary Incentive Delay Task
- Participant Experiences and Recommendations for Improving Eat Well, Be Well, Rhode Island’s Statewide Retail SNAP Incentive Program: a Qualitative Study
- Experiences of Inspiratory Muscle Training and Physical Exercise in Adults with Post-COVID-19 Condition and Inspiratory Muscle Weakness: A Qualitative Study
- Breath-by-breath parasternal intercostal muscle stiffening tracks inspiratory effort during graded inspiratory threshold loading in humans
BibTeX
@article{khaweephabphimphasak2026modified,
title = {{Modified use of the Triflo II® incentive spirometer and its effects on feedback ball elevation, selective closure of air inlets, and inspiratory flow and pressure: A bench study}},
author = {Vatcharaporn Khaweephab-Phimphasak and Aung Aung Nwe and Buranat Audsavachulamanee and Wanpen Poomsukcharoen and Chatchai Phimphasak},
journal = {Journal of Associated Medical Sciences},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.66285/jams.2027.019},
url = {https://doi.org/10.66285/jams.2027.019},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Modified use of the Triflo II® incentive spirometer and its effects on feedback ball elevation, selective closure of air inlets, and inspiratory flow and pressure: A bench study
AU - Vatcharaporn Khaweephab-Phimphasak
AU - Aung Aung Nwe
AU - Buranat Audsavachulamanee
AU - Wanpen Poomsukcharoen
AU - Chatchai Phimphasak
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/28
JO - Journal of Associated Medical Sciences
DO - 10.66285/jams.2027.019
UR - https://doi.org/10.66285/jams.2027.019
AB - Background: The Triflo II® incentive spirometer (TF) is widely prescribed for lung expansion exercise, but its high inspiratory flow rate and short inspiratory time, leading to increased effort and lower tidal volume, are recognized limitations. Modifying its use may improve its effectiveness. Objectives: As an initial step before human studies, a bench test was conducted to evaluate inspiratory flow and pressure responses under controlled conditions. Materials and methods: A bench test was conducted under two conditions: (1) three target ball elevation levels were marked on the wall of each TF chamber, and airflow rate and pressure responses were evaluated during simulated airflow at each target level; and (2) selective closure of air inlets was performed by closing one or two of the three air inlet holes of the TF device, and the corresponding airflow rate and pressure responses were evaluated. Results: No significant differences were observed in the 900 mL/sec chamber. In the 600 mL/sec chamber, the fourth quarter had a significantly higher flow rate (652±6 mL/sec) than the second (605±5 mL/sec, p<0.001) and third (601±8 mL/sec, p<0.001). Similarly, in the 1200 mL/sec chamber, the fourth quarter (994±13 mL/sec) had a significantly higher flow rate than the second (917±8 mL/sec, p<0.001) and third (914±7 mL/sec, p<0.001). Closing the second and third air inlet holes while lifting the 600 mL/sec ball produced the lowest inspiratory flow rate (432±15 mL/sec) and pressure (-4.0±0.3 cm H₂O) among conditions. Conclusion: Feedback ball elevation influenced inspiratory flow and pressure in the 600 and 1200 mL/sec chambers, whereas no significant differences were observed in the 900 mL/sec chamber. Selective closure of air inlets, particularly closure of two inlets, markedly reduced inspiratory flow and pressure. Further in vivo studies in human subjects are warranted to validate these findings.
SN - 2539-6056
ER -