Clinical Effectiveness of AI-Based Cardiac Arrest Prediction System for General Ward Patients (VITAL-MD): Protocol for a Multicenter Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
12 affiliations
- 1VUNO, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 2Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- 3Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
- 4Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
- 5Department of Cardiology, College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Hwaseong, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
- 6Department of Critical Care Medicine, Inha University Hospital, 27 Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon, 22332, Republic of Korea, 82 32-890-2114, 82 32-890-2114.
- 7Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea.
- 8Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea.
- 9Department of Hospital Medicine, Critical Care Support Part, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
- 10Department of Nursing, Rapid Response Team, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
- 11Department of Nursing, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
- 12Rapid Response Team, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Background
In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) remains a frequent and devastating event, and conventional early warning scores (EWSs) coupled with rapid response systems (RRSs) have shown inconsistent effects on patient-centered outcomes, largely owing to limited predictive accuracy and high false-alarm burden. AI-based EWSs (AI-EWSs) have demonstrated superior discrimination retrospectively, but high-quality prospective evidence in true external validation environments remains scarce. Existing AI-EWS trials have either been confined to internal-development settings or bundled the algorithm with specific implementation infrastructure, leaving the stand-alone effect of AI-based software as a medical device (AI-SaMD) on patient outcomes uncharacterized.Objective
This trial will evaluate whether implementation of AI-SaMD (VUNO Med-DeepCARS) as a stand-alone clinical decision-support tool in routine general-ward care reduces IHCA compared with usual care based on conventional EWSs.Methods
The VITAL-MD trial (validation of an AI-based clinical deterioration prediction model on patient outcomes through a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial [SW-CRT] multicenter evaluation of DeepCARS) is a pragmatic, multicenter, SW-CRT conducted at 4 tertiary academic hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Six tertiary academic hospitals were assessed for eligibility based on inpatient capacity, RRS operating hours aligned with the national RRS pilot program, and no prior AI-SaMD use. All adult patients aged 19 years or older admitted to general wards during the 12-month trial period are included; patients younger than 19 years, or with no documented vital signs throughout hospitalization, are excluded. The 4 sites are randomized to sequentially transition from preimplementation (usual care) to postimplementation (AI-SaMD-guided care) in 4 steps separated by 7-day washout periods. DeepCARS generates real-time risk scores from 4 vital signs and integrates into the existing electronic medical record interface without altering RRS workflows. The primary outcome is the incidence of general-ward IHCA, defined per the Utstein guidelines, among the target cohort (defined as patients exceeding the alert threshold at least once). Assuming a baseline IHCA incidence of 6.70%, a 40% relative risk reduction, an intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.01, and 350 patients per cluster-period, 7002 target-cohort patients (total enrollment approximately 72,695) provide 80% power. Analyses follow the intention-to-treat principle using generalized linear mixed models adjusting for prespecified covariates, with prespecified sensitivity, subgroup, and compliance analyses.Results
The trial was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0010243) on February 28, 2025. Recruitment was conducted from April 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026. All 4 sites completed transition to the postimplementation period, and data cleaning is currently underway before the final database lock, with primary results expected in 2027.Conclusions
VITAL-MD will provide the first large-scale, multicenter randomized evidence evaluating whether an AI-EWS, deployed as a stand-alone device in external validation environments and benchmarked against real-world standard-of-care practice, improves patient-centered outcomes for general-ward patients, advancing the evaluation of AI-SaMD from retrospective diagnostic accuracy toward prospective, action-anchored clinical utility.
Related
- Water Vapor Thermal Therapy with Rezūm Versus Combination Pharmacotherapy for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction: 1-Yr Results From a Prospective, Multicenter, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial (VAPEUR-RCT)
- The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Common mental disorders (EPIC): protocol of a pragmatic randomized waitlist-controlled superiority trial
- Effectiveness of a pharmacist-led protocol to manage cystitis in women, in France: the PharmaCyst’ open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled, cluster study
- Effectiveness of hochuekkito for colorectal cancer management: protocol for the multicenter randomized controlled AMATERAS study.
- SURMOUNT‐REAL UK: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Tirzepatide in Adults With Obesity
BibTeX
@article{kim2026clinical,
title = {{Clinical Effectiveness of AI-Based Cardiac Arrest Prediction System for General Ward Patients (VITAL-MD): Protocol for a Multicenter Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.}},
author = {Mincheol Kim and Kyung Hoon Kim and Minsoo Kim and Sun Jung Kwon and Myung Soo Park and Ah Jin Kim and Man-Jong Lee and Mi Hwa Park and Hyung Keun Cha and Minhyeok Lee and In Beom Jeong and Soon Joo Wang and Sung Bak An and Jeen Hwa Lee and Kyung-Jae Cho and Jinhui Jang and HyoJin Jeong and Yoon Young Lee and Woori Han and VITAL-MD Study Group and Jung Soo Kim and Dongjoon Yoo},
journal = {JMIR research protocols},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/104230},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42895816},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Clinical Effectiveness of AI-Based Cardiac Arrest Prediction System for General Ward Patients (VITAL-MD): Protocol for a Multicenter Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
AU - Mincheol Kim
AU - Kyung Hoon Kim
AU - Minsoo Kim
AU - Sun Jung Kwon
AU - Myung Soo Park
AU - Ah Jin Kim
AU - Man-Jong Lee
AU - Mi Hwa Park
AU - Hyung Keun Cha
AU - Minhyeok Lee
AU - In Beom Jeong
AU - Soon Joo Wang
AU - Sung Bak An
AU - Jeen Hwa Lee
AU - Kyung-Jae Cho
AU - Jinhui Jang
AU - HyoJin Jeong
AU - Yoon Young Lee
AU - Woori Han
AU - VITAL-MD Study Group
AU - Jung Soo Kim
AU - Dongjoon Yoo
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
JO - JMIR research protocols
DO - 10.2196/104230
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42895816
AB - Background In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) remains a frequent and devastating event, and conventional early warning scores (EWSs) coupled with rapid response systems (RRSs) have shown inconsistent effects on patient-centered outcomes, largely owing to limited predictive accuracy and high false-alarm burden. AI-based EWSs (AI-EWSs) have demonstrated superior discrimination retrospectively, but high-quality prospective evidence in true external validation environments remains scarce. Existing AI-EWS trials have either been confined to internal-development settings or bundled the algorithm with specific implementation infrastructure, leaving the stand-alone effect of AI-based software as a medical device (AI-SaMD) on patient outcomes uncharacterized.Objective This trial will evaluate whether implementation of AI-SaMD (VUNO Med-DeepCARS) as a stand-alone clinical decision-support tool in routine general-ward care reduces IHCA compared with usual care based on conventional EWSs.Methods The VITAL-MD trial (validation of an AI-based clinical deterioration prediction model on patient outcomes through a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial [SW-CRT] multicenter evaluation of DeepCARS) is a pragmatic, multicenter, SW-CRT conducted at 4 tertiary academic hospitals in the Republic of Korea. Six tertiary academic hospitals were assessed for eligibility based on inpatient capacity, RRS operating hours aligned with the national RRS pilot program, and no prior AI-SaMD use. All adult patients aged 19 years or older admitted to general wards during the 12-month trial period are included; patients younger than 19 years, or with no documented vital signs throughout hospitalization, are excluded. The 4 sites are randomized to sequentially transition from preimplementation (usual care) to postimplementation (AI-SaMD-guided care) in 4 steps separated by 7-day washout periods. DeepCARS generates real-time risk scores from 4 vital signs and integrates into the existing electronic medical record interface without altering RRS workflows. The primary outcome is the incidence of general-ward IHCA, defined per the Utstein guidelines, among the target cohort (defined as patients exceeding the alert threshold at least once). Assuming a baseline IHCA incidence of 6.70%, a 40% relative risk reduction, an intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.01, and 350 patients per cluster-period, 7002 target-cohort patients (total enrollment approximately 72,695) provide 80% power. Analyses follow the intention-to-treat principle using generalized linear mixed models adjusting for prespecified covariates, with prespecified sensitivity, subgroup, and compliance analyses.Results The trial was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0010243) on February 28, 2025. Recruitment was conducted from April 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026. All 4 sites completed transition to the postimplementation period, and data cleaning is currently underway before the final database lock, with primary results expected in 2027.Conclusions VITAL-MD will provide the first large-scale, multicenter randomized evidence evaluating whether an AI-EWS, deployed as a stand-alone device in external validation environments and benchmarked against real-world standard-of-care practice, improves patient-centered outcomes for general-ward patients, advancing the evaluation of AI-SaMD from retrospective diagnostic accuracy toward prospective, action-anchored clinical utility.
SN - 1929-0748
ER -