Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,273 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Using Social Network Analysis to Map Infectious Risk Across Care Settings

Abstract

Background: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and hospitals form an interconnected system in which patient mobility shapes the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Facility-level approaches may fail to capture the system-level structure of infectious risk. We applied Social Network Analysis to map carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) circulation in Tuscany.

Methods: Retrospective study of 2024 regional administrative healthcare flows for residents aged ≥65 years in LTCFs in Tuscany. Three directed weighted networks linking LTCFs, hospitals and emergency departments were built: all-cause transfers, transfers of CRE-colonised and CRE-infected residents. Node-level centrality metrics (degree, weighted degree, and betweenness) were compared between networks using Spearman’s rank correlation stratified by node type, with case studies on top-ranking nodes.

Results: The cohort included 11,914 residents in 325 LTCFs (mean age 85, 70% female); CRE incidence was 4.1/100,000 person-days, with hospital-acquired (79.7) far exceeding LTCF-acquired (3.1) rates. The CRE-colonised network was sparser than the all-cause network (107 vs 411 nodes). Centralities in the CRE-infected network correlated strongly with all-cause centralities (weighted in-degree ρ = 0.91; betweenness ρ = 0.71; p < 0.001), whereas the CRE-colonised network showed only moderate correlations (ρ = 0.59 and ρ = 0.28; p < 0.001); betweenness showed the lowest agreement. Case studies revealed a tertiary hospital with high all-cause betweenness (0.109) but limited CRE bridging role (0.004), and an LTCF channelling 271 CRE-positive transfers exclusively to acute care.

Conclusions: Infectious risk is shaped not only by healthcare volume but by the structural position of facilities within patient-sharing networks. Bridging roles diverge most between all-cause and CRE networks; network-informed indicators may identify high-risk nodes invisible to traditional surveillance and support coordinated prevention.

Key messages: • Patient-sharing networks reveal infectious risk patterns that facility-level surveillance may miss, especially across LTCFs, hospitals and emergency departments.

• Bridging roles differ markedly between all-cause and CRE networks, supporting network-informed targeting of IPC and screening strategies.

Related

  1. Workforce Cost Absorption among Community Health Promoters in Fragmented Maternal Nutrition and Social Protection Systems: A Qualitative Study Across Three Kenyan Settings
    F. M. SIVA, D. Nyatuka, R. de la Harpe
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsmedRxiv
  2. Effect of local versus global risk and normative information on voluntary quarantine adoption: protocol for a 2×2 randomised controlled trial leveraging app-based epigames across diverse congregate settings (The Epi-Q Study).
    Estelle McCool, Winnie W Mkandawire, Salihu S Musa +14
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Nature-based social prescribing for children across care settings: baseline findings from CONNECT
    M J Marques, A R Goes, V Morgado +2
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyPMCEurope PMC
  4. CO065 | THROMBOTIC RISK IS NOT UNIFORM ACROSS APHERESIS SETTINGS: INSIGHTS FROM CAR-T LYMPHOCYTAPHERESIS AND AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL COLLECTION
    Ilaria Pansini
    Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textCardiovascular medicineDOAJ
  5. Genetics in Context: Social Factors Modify Polygenic Risk Across Multiple Cardiometabolic Diseases
    M. Hysong, S. Hsu, F. Akhtari +14
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textHuman geneticsmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{casigliani2026using,
  title = {{Using Social Network Analysis to Map Infectious Risk Across Care Settings}},
  author = {V Casigliani and S Forni and F Collini and F Gemmi and A Bedini and F Ruffini and A Bechini and F Marcelloni and C Rizzo and M Falcone},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.422},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.422},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Using Social Network Analysis to Map Infectious Risk Across Care Settings
AU  - V Casigliani
AU  - S Forni
AU  - F Collini
AU  - F Gemmi
AU  - A Bedini
AU  - F Ruffini
AU  - A Bechini
AU  - F Marcelloni
AU  - C Rizzo
AU  - M Falcone
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.422
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.422
AB  - Background: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and hospitals form an interconnected system in which patient mobility shapes the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Facility-level approaches may fail to capture the system-level structure of infectious risk. We applied Social Network Analysis to map carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) circulation in Tuscany.  Methods: Retrospective study of 2024 regional administrative healthcare flows for residents aged ≥65 years in LTCFs in Tuscany. Three directed weighted networks linking LTCFs, hospitals and emergency departments were built: all-cause transfers, transfers of CRE-colonised and CRE-infected residents. Node-level centrality metrics (degree, weighted degree, and betweenness) were compared between networks using Spearman’s rank correlation stratified by node type, with case studies on top-ranking nodes.  Results: The cohort included 11,914 residents in 325 LTCFs (mean age 85, 70% female); CRE incidence was 4.1/100,000 person-days, with hospital-acquired (79.7) far exceeding LTCF-acquired (3.1) rates. The CRE-colonised network was sparser than the all-cause network (107 vs 411 nodes). Centralities in the CRE-infected network correlated strongly with all-cause centralities (weighted in-degree ρ = 0.91; betweenness ρ = 0.71; p < 0.001), whereas the CRE-colonised network showed only moderate correlations (ρ = 0.59 and ρ = 0.28; p < 0.001); betweenness showed the lowest agreement. Case studies revealed a tertiary hospital with high all-cause betweenness (0.109) but limited CRE bridging role (0.004), and an LTCF channelling 271 CRE-positive transfers exclusively to acute care.  Conclusions: Infectious risk is shaped not only by healthcare volume but by the structural position of facilities within patient-sharing networks. Bridging roles diverge most between all-cause and CRE networks; network-informed indicators may identify high-risk nodes invisible to traditional surveillance and support coordinated prevention.  Key messages: • Patient-sharing networks reveal infectious risk patterns that facility-level surveillance may miss, especially across LTCFs, hospitals and emergency departments.  • Bridging roles differ markedly between all-cause and CRE networks, supporting network-informed targeting of IPC and screening strategies.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -