Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

A 5-mm open umbilical entry technique for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery

  1. 1New York Medical College School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY USA
  2. 2WestMed Reproductive Services, Purchase, NY USA

Abstract

Background and objectives: Laparoscopic entry carries a complication rate of up to 1.3%, including bowel and vascular injury. The Hasson, Veress, and 5-mm open entry techniques differ in approach: Hasson uses a 1–2 cm open incision, Veress involves blind needle access, and the 5-mm open entry technique uses a small umbilical incision with blunt peritoneal entry followed by insertion of a 5-mm bladeless optical trocar. Previously shown to be safe and easily mastered by both attendings and residents, this study re-evaluates the 5-mm technique in a multi-surgeon setting.

Methods: The senior author’s extensive clinical experience with this technique informed its continued use and motivated the present retrospective evaluation of all consecutive cases performed between 2021 and 2025. The technique involves tenting the umbilicus with three tonsil clamps, injecting 1 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, making a 2–4 mm vertical incision within the umbilical scar that is then stretched to approximately 5 mm with a tonsil clamp, and bluntly dissecting the fascia to expose the mid-umbilical fascia and enter the peritoneal cavity. A 5-mm bladeless optical trocar is advanced under direct visualization, and carbon dioxide insufflation begins once placement is confirmed.

Results: All cases achieved successful entry without conversion to Veress. One patient had a Hasson entry for concurrent cholecystectomy. Omental adhesions were present in 15 cases (7.7%). No entry-related complications occurred.

Conclusion: In this cohort, the 5-mm open entry technique was successfully performed without entry-related complications and demonstrated favorable cosmetic outcomes.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04172-6.

Related

  1. Development and Internal Validation of a Perioperative Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery.
    Zihui Zheng, Qinzhu Wu, Yuhua Zhou
    Journal of multidisciplinary healthcarePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  2. Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation versus sham stimulation and dexamethasone versus amisulpride for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: protocol for a randomized 2 × 2 factorial trial
    Yu Li, Jun Zhang, Yu Xu +5
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  3. Effect of a physical training program on simulated laparoscopic performance in gynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Vincent Dochez, Margot Ondet, Aurélie Sarcher +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral biologyObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsHAL
  4. Perioperative transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    R. Wang, H. Yang, H. Li +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  5. Delayed Umbilical Extrusion of a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Following Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Case Report
    Alejandro M Castañer, Amanda Detres, Alejandro E Cedeño-Morán +3
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{robb2026open,
  title = {{A 5-mm open umbilical entry technique for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery}},
  author = {Carolyn Robb and Lauren Tetelbaun and Patricia Xu and Chloe Schreiber and Alexis Greene and Martin Keltz},
  journal = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1007/s00423-026-04172-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04172-6},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A 5-mm open umbilical entry technique for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery
AU  - Carolyn Robb
AU  - Lauren Tetelbaun
AU  - Patricia Xu
AU  - Chloe Schreiber
AU  - Alexis Greene
AU  - Martin Keltz
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/08
JO  - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
DO  - 10.1007/s00423-026-04172-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04172-6
AB  - Background and objectives: Laparoscopic entry carries a complication rate of up to 1.3%, including bowel and vascular injury. The Hasson, Veress, and 5-mm open entry techniques differ in approach: Hasson uses a 1–2 cm open incision, Veress involves blind needle access, and the 5-mm open entry technique uses a small umbilical incision with blunt peritoneal entry followed by insertion of a 5-mm bladeless optical trocar. Previously shown to be safe and easily mastered by both attendings and residents, this study re-evaluates the 5-mm technique in a multi-surgeon setting.  Methods: The senior author’s extensive clinical experience with this technique informed its continued use and motivated the present retrospective evaluation of all consecutive cases performed between 2021 and 2025. The technique involves tenting the umbilicus with three tonsil clamps, injecting 1 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, making a 2–4 mm vertical incision within the umbilical scar that is then stretched to approximately 5 mm with a tonsil clamp, and bluntly dissecting the fascia to expose the mid-umbilical fascia and enter the peritoneal cavity. A 5-mm bladeless optical trocar is advanced under direct visualization, and carbon dioxide insufflation begins once placement is confirmed.  Results: All cases achieved successful entry without conversion to Veress. One patient had a Hasson entry for concurrent cholecystectomy. Omental adhesions were present in 15 cases (7.7%). No entry-related complications occurred.  Conclusion: In this cohort, the 5-mm open entry technique was successfully performed without entry-related complications and demonstrated favorable cosmetic outcomes.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04172-6.
SN  - 1435-2443
SN  - 1435-2451
ER  -