Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

De novo design of ligand binding proteins using large language models alone

  1. 1University of California, San Francisco

Abstract

Protein design has rapidly advanced with the advent of sequence- and structure-based machine learning models. However, reasoned design, which applies physicochemical principles and rules derived from sequence-structure-function relationships, has not seen the same benefits from generative machine learning models. Here, we test the ability of common large language models (LLMs; e.g. Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini) to consider design principles to generate de novo proteins that bind metals and lipophilic small molecules without copying existing sequences. Common LLMs alone are able to 1) generate protein sequences to adopt a desired fold and bind the target ligand and 2) explain the principles that motivate the design choices. Following structure prediction and filtering, we selected a small set of designs (6 to 12 designs per query) for experimental validation, affording metal binders in one round of LLM-based design (25% hit rate) and perfluorooctanoic acid binders in two rounds (25% hit rate in the second round of design). Importantly, the LLMs produce detailed justification to accompany the de novo designed sequences, providing a conceptual framework on which designs can be evaluated. While the successful designs have some deviations from the prompted parameters and LLM-articulated design rationale, these campaigns provide a case study that highlights the utility of LLMs in making protein design more comprehensible and accessible to users without sophisticated design expertise.

Related

  1. Programmable design of functional proteins from natural language
    Fengyuan Dai, Shiyang You, Yudian Zhu +30
    NaturePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text16 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
  2. Zero-shot design of drug-binding proteins via neural iterative selection−expansion
    Benjamin N. Fry, Kaia Slaw, Nicholas F. Polizzi
    NaturePeer-reviewedCC BY10 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
  3. Identification and Ligand-Binding Mechanism Analysis of a C4-Dicarboxylate Chemoreceptor from Agrobacterium tumefaciens
    BiomoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryEurope PMC
  4. From Ligand Binding to Pore Opening in the Mosquito Odorant Receptor AaegOR10
    T. Song, Z. Xu, Z. Liu +4
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  5. Ligand binding remodels the oligomeric state and active site of Klebsiella pneumoniae azoreductase
    R. Hitchings, A. Ghosh, A. J. Arcinas +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral biochemistrybioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{kim2026novo,
  title = {{De novo design of ligand binding proteins using large language models alone}},
  author = {N. H. Kim and A. K. Hatstat and H. Jo and Y. Wu and W. F. DeGrado},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.02.748987},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.748987v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - De novo design of ligand binding proteins using large language models alone
AU  - N. H. Kim
AU  - A. K. Hatstat
AU  - H. Jo
AU  - Y. Wu
AU  - W. F. DeGrado
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/02
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.02.748987
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.02.748987v1
AB  - Protein design has rapidly advanced with the advent of sequence- and structure-based machine learning models. However, reasoned design, which applies physicochemical principles and rules derived from sequence-structure-function relationships, has not seen the same benefits from generative machine learning models. Here, we test the ability of common large language models (LLMs; e.g. Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini) to consider design principles to generate de novo proteins that bind metals and lipophilic small molecules without copying existing sequences. Common LLMs alone are able to 1) generate protein sequences to adopt a desired fold and bind the target ligand and 2) explain the principles that motivate the design choices. Following structure prediction and filtering, we selected a small set of designs (6 to 12 designs per query) for experimental validation, affording metal binders in one round of LLM-based design (25% hit rate) and perfluorooctanoic acid binders in two rounds (25% hit rate in the second round of design). Importantly, the LLMs produce detailed justification to accompany the de novo designed sequences, providing a conceptual framework on which designs can be evaluated. While the successful designs have some deviations from the prompted parameters and LLM-articulated design rationale, these campaigns provide a case study that highlights the utility of LLMs in making protein design more comprehensible and accessible to users without sophisticated design expertise.
ER  -