Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Optimal probing scale for current fluctuations in a Brownian gyrator

Abstract

A driven colloidal rotor sustains a circulating current whose fluctuations one would like to bound. Any such bound rests on how strongly the current responds to a perturbation and on how much extra dissipation that perturbation costs, so there is a well-posed question of where to push: the response per unit Onsager-Machlup cost depends on the radius at which the probe acts, and is maximised at a definite one. We answer this for the Brownian gyrator and a quadrupolar shear under a Gaussian envelope, a probe chosen so that linear response is exactly blind to it at every observation window, so that the entire signal is second order. The problem separates: the cost is radial and does not see the circulation, while the response lives in the m=3 angular sector, where the resolvent reduces to Kummer's equation with b=4 and the susceptibility is a hypergeometric function of the envelope width. Maximising the ratio gives the optimal probing radius in closed form. It is set by whichever of the system's two clocks is faster: for weak driving r*=1.1264√(D/γ), the thermal radius of the trap, and for strong driving r*=1.5563√(D/Ω), the distance diffused in one radian of rotation, with the trap stiffness dropping out entirely. The crossover is at Ω=γ. Both limits, and the prefactors, are confirmed against direct simulation.

Related

  1. Network analysis for steady-state current fluctuations under finite affinity: Application to Brownian computation
    Yasuhiro Utsumi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Brownian gyrator model with stochastic resetting
    Satya N. Majumdar, Gregory Schehr, Pascal Viot +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  3. Probing fluctuating hydrodynamics through current fluctuations in hard rod gas
    Tirthankar Mondal, Indranil Mukherjee, Anupam Kundu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  4. Dynamics of charge fluctuations in nanocapacitors: Effects of salt concentration and electrode metallicity from Brownian dynamics
    Paul Desmarchelier, Benjamin Rotenberg
    The Journal of Chemical PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textTheoretical & computational chemistryGeneral physicsHAL
  5. Probing Operator Spreading with Local Quantum Fluctuations
    Bertúlio de Lima Bernardo
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{farih2026optimal,
  title = {{Optimal probing scale for current fluctuations in a Brownian gyrator}},
  author = {Badr Farih},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.24748},
  eprint = {2609.24748},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24748},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Optimal probing scale for current fluctuations in a Brownian gyrator
AU  - Badr Farih
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/21
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.24748
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24748
AB  - A driven colloidal rotor sustains a circulating current whose fluctuations one would like to bound. Any such bound rests on how strongly the current responds to a perturbation and on how much extra dissipation that perturbation costs, so there is a well-posed question of where to push: the response per unit Onsager-Machlup cost depends on the radius at which the probe acts, and is maximised at a definite one. We answer this for the Brownian gyrator and a quadrupolar shear under a Gaussian envelope, a probe chosen so that linear response is exactly blind to it at every observation window, so that the entire signal is second order. The problem separates: the cost is radial and does not see the circulation, while the response lives in the m=3 angular sector, where the resolvent reduces to Kummer's equation with b=4 and the susceptibility is a hypergeometric function of the envelope width. Maximising the ratio gives the optimal probing radius in closed form. It is set by whichever of the system's two clocks is faster: for weak driving r^*=1.1264√(D/γ), the thermal radius of the trap, and for strong driving r^*=1.5563√(D/Ω), the distance diffused in one radian of rotation, with the trap stiffness dropping out entirely. The crossover is at Ω=γ. Both limits, and the prefactors, are confirmed against direct simulation.
ER  -