Causal inference in conservation policy: Evaluating the effects of Protected Areas on deforestation and well-being in the Peruvian Amazon
- 1Department of Economics and Environmental Management, Universidad Antonio Ruiz de Montoya, Lima, Peru
Abstract
The Peruvian Amazon, one of the most biodiverse regions on Earth, is under increasing pressure from deforestation, threatening both ecological wealth and local livelihoods. Protected Areas (PAs) have emerged as one of the main conservation strategies; however, questions remain regarding their effectiveness in reducing deforestation and their socioeconomic impact. This study evaluates the effects of PAs, their Buffer Zones (BZs), and Regional Conservation Areas (RCAs) on deforestation and household welfare between 2001 and 2023. Using causal inference methods, geographic Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) and staggered Difference-in-Differences (DiD), the analysis integrates high-resolution spatial data on forest loss with georeferenced household information. Results indicate that PAs significantly reduce long-term deforestation by 1.3 to 2.8 ha/km2, while BZs mitigate forest loss by 1.1 to 1.5 ha/km2. However, no significant deforestation effects are observed in the short term. Regarding welfare, households within BZs exhibit lower per capita income and expenditure, particularly near indirect-use PAs. The study also provides exploratory evidence on RCAs, a category rarely examined in the literature. Although their estimated effects are smaller and not statistically significant, their inclusion highlights the growing role of regional governance in conservation policy. These findings indicate that conservation outcomes strengthen over time and depend on local governance, institutional capacity, and the ability to contain pressures from extractive activities. This research contributes new empirical evidence to inform conservation policy design, emphasizing the need to integrate ecological and social dimensions into Protected Area management.
Related
- Understanding spatial heterogeneity of rocky reef demersal fish assemblages: Links to conservation plans in the Juan Fernández Archipelago Marine Protected Area in the Southeastern Pacific
- BioTrajX: evaluating biological plausibility in single-cell trajectory inference
- Nearly ninety percent of Indonesian coffee area is classified as deforestation-free under the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)
- Incentives are effective but insufficient to halt smallholder deforestation in the Colombian Amazon
- A global life-cycle inventory database of deforestation area and emissions for agricultural products
BibTeX
@article{paredes2026causal,
title = {{Causal inference in conservation policy: Evaluating the effects of Protected Areas on deforestation and well-being in the Peruvian Amazon}},
author = {Teresa L. Paredes and Karen I. Eckhardt},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0337468},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337468},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Causal inference in conservation policy: Evaluating the effects of Protected Areas on deforestation and well-being in the Peruvian Amazon
AU - Teresa L. Paredes
AU - Karen I. Eckhardt
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/14
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0337468
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337468
AB - The Peruvian Amazon, one of the most biodiverse regions on Earth, is under increasing pressure from deforestation, threatening both ecological wealth and local livelihoods. Protected Areas (PAs) have emerged as one of the main conservation strategies; however, questions remain regarding their effectiveness in reducing deforestation and their socioeconomic impact. This study evaluates the effects of PAs, their Buffer Zones (BZs), and Regional Conservation Areas (RCAs) on deforestation and household welfare between 2001 and 2023. Using causal inference methods, geographic Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) and staggered Difference-in-Differences (DiD), the analysis integrates high-resolution spatial data on forest loss with georeferenced household information. Results indicate that PAs significantly reduce long-term deforestation by 1.3 to 2.8 ha/km2, while BZs mitigate forest loss by 1.1 to 1.5 ha/km2. However, no significant deforestation effects are observed in the short term. Regarding welfare, households within BZs exhibit lower per capita income and expenditure, particularly near indirect-use PAs. The study also provides exploratory evidence on RCAs, a category rarely examined in the literature. Although their estimated effects are smaller and not statistically significant, their inclusion highlights the growing role of regional governance in conservation policy. These findings indicate that conservation outcomes strengthen over time and depend on local governance, institutional capacity, and the ability to contain pressures from extractive activities. This research contributes new empirical evidence to inform conservation policy design, emphasizing the need to integrate ecological and social dimensions into Protected Area management.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -