Errorless learning of a video call in Alzheimer Disease: verbal motor error dissociation as a potential marker of procedural learning (a pilot study)
- 1Université de Montréal
Abstract
BackgroundDementia is rising worldwide, and in Alzheimer Disease (AD) the loss of communication adds to the burden. In AD the explicit, error correcting memory fails early, whereas procedural and implicit memory is relatively preserved, which is the basis of errorless learning.
ObjectiveTo test whether people with AD can learn an everyday communicative task, placing a video call, through errorless learning, and to characterise the learning curve and the pattern of verbal and motor errors.
MethodsTwenty patients with AD learned a three step video call on a touchscreen through errorless learning, over two sessions of 15 minutes with three trials each, separated by a 15 minute interval. Execution time was recorded for each trial. Verbal errors, a correct gesture with an incorrect verbalisation, and motor errors, a wrong, approximate, or absent gesture, were scored for each step. Means are reported with 95% confidence intervals.
ResultsMean execution time fell from 41.7 to 23.3 seconds and levelled off over the last two trials of the second session. Verbal and motor errors followed significantly different courses across steps: verbal errors were present from the first trial and fell close to zero by the last step of the second session, whereas motor errors increased.
ConclusionPeople with AD acquired the procedure, and the dissociation between verbal and motor errors is consistent with a dissociation between procedural performance and explicit verbal report during acquisition. These preliminary findings support the use of preserved procedural memory in rehabilitation.
Related
- Procedural Learning and Retention in Older Subjects: The Contribution of Sensorimotor and Premotor Cortex
- Procedural learning in the serial reaction time task in individuals with and without Dyslexia: group-level and individual differences
- Potential links between PCOS/PMOS and Alzheimer disease and related dementias
- Dexmedetomidine as a potential neuroprotective agent against Alzheimer’s disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives
- Shared mechanisms and therapeutic horizons: exploring the potential interplay between benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms and Alzheimer’s disease
BibTeX
@misc{vincenti2026errorless,
title = {{Errorless learning of a video call in Alzheimer Disease: verbal motor error dissociation as a potential marker of procedural learning (a pilot study)}},
author = {C. Vincenti},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.08.26362385},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.26362385v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Errorless learning of a video call in Alzheimer Disease: verbal motor error dissociation as a potential marker of procedural learning (a pilot study)
AU - C. Vincenti
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/08
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.08.26362385
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.26362385v1
AB - BackgroundDementia is rising worldwide, and in Alzheimer Disease (AD) the loss of communication adds to the burden. In AD the explicit, error correcting memory fails early, whereas procedural and implicit memory is relatively preserved, which is the basis of errorless learning. ObjectiveTo test whether people with AD can learn an everyday communicative task, placing a video call, through errorless learning, and to characterise the learning curve and the pattern of verbal and motor errors. MethodsTwenty patients with AD learned a three step video call on a touchscreen through errorless learning, over two sessions of 15 minutes with three trials each, separated by a 15 minute interval. Execution time was recorded for each trial. Verbal errors, a correct gesture with an incorrect verbalisation, and motor errors, a wrong, approximate, or absent gesture, were scored for each step. Means are reported with 95% confidence intervals. ResultsMean execution time fell from 41.7 to 23.3 seconds and levelled off over the last two trials of the second session. Verbal and motor errors followed significantly different courses across steps: verbal errors were present from the first trial and fell close to zero by the last step of the second session, whereas motor errors increased. ConclusionPeople with AD acquired the procedure, and the dissociation between verbal and motor errors is consistent with a dissociation between procedural performance and explicit verbal report during acquisition. These preliminary findings support the use of preserved procedural memory in rehabilitation.
ER -