Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology

Modeling Treatment Response in Tuberculosis Early Bactericidal Activity Trials

4 more authors
14 affiliations
  1. 1Institute of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, LMU University Hospital Munich Germany
  2. 2Institute of AI for Health, Helmholtz Center Munich—German Research Center for Environmental Health Neuherberg Germany
  3. 3Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Pettenkofer School of Public Health LMU Medizin, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany
  4. 4Helmholtz Pioneer Campus Helmholtz Zentrum München—German Research Center for Environmental Health Neuherberg Germany
  5. 5Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology, and Toxicology Radboud Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands
  6. 6German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Munich Partner Site Munich Germany
  7. 7National Institute for Medical Research‐Mbeya Medical Research Center Mbeya Tanzania
  8. 8UCSF Center for Tuberculosis University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USA
  9. 9TASK Applied Science Clinical Research Center Cape Town South Africa
  10. 10Department of Medicine University of Cape Town Lung Institute Cape Town South Africa
  11. 11Department of Pharmacy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
  12. 12Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology, Infection, and Pandemic Research Munich Germany
  13. 13School of Computation, Information and Technology Technical University of Munich Garching Germany
  14. 14Unit Global Health, Helmholtz Zentrum München—German Research Centre for Environmental Health Neuherberg Germany

Abstract

Culture‐based monitoring of bacterial load is slow and susceptible to missing data, contributing to the length and cost of TB clinical trials. Non‐culture‐based alternatives, like the Tuberculosis Molecular Load Bacterial Assay (TB‐MBLA), could represent a solution. Our objectives were to evaluate TB‐MBLA as a biomarker in early bactericidal activity (EBA) studies and explore whether combining biomarkers with joint modeling could provide insight into underlying biological processes. We generated TB‐MBLA (LifeArc) data from sputum samples from all 78 patients from the PanACEA BTZ‐043 Phase Ib/IIa trial and derived a summary measure of the joint distribution of the three TB‐MBLA, colony forming units (CFU), and time‐to‐positivity (TTP) biomarkers as the first principal component derived from a probabilistic principal component analysis (pPCA). With TB‐MBLA marker and the principal component 1 (PC1) values, we reevaluated the original stage IIa dose–response and stages Ib/IIa pharmacokinetics—pharmacodynamics (PK‐PD) exposure‐response analyses, applying linear and non‐linear mixed models, respectively. For TB‐MBLA, we could not detect an exposure‐response effect in the PK‐PD analysis, in contrast with CFU and TTP. When combining biomarkers, we observed a significant but less pronounced E max exposure–response between days 0–3 compared with CFU and TTP alone. We also successfully applied pPCA as a modeling framework and show evidence that combining CFU and TTP in a joint latent component can improve detection of treatment effects compared with either biomarker alone. In this study, we present novel EBA data for the first‐in‐class antimycobacterial compound BTZ‐043 and contextualize the value of emerging bacteriological markers within the EBA trial framework.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04044001

Related

  1. Optimal Control Approach for Modeling the Introduction of Sterilizing Treatment for Tuberculosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
    Edwin Barrios-Rivera, Daiver Cardona-Salgado, Ilya Dikariev +3
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Infectious diseaseCrossref
  2. Early sputum bacterial load dynamics predict treatment response in multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: A multicenter prospective cohort study
    Fuzhen Zhang, Zilong Yang, Min Jiang +10
    Journal of InfectionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseDOAJ
  3. Clinical and laboratory determinants of treatment response and rifampicin resistance among Xpert MTB/RIF-confirmed extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients: A prospective study from Central India
    Gautam Bhagwat, Mala Kanthali, Swati Chauhan +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biochemistryCell biologyPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  4. Early bactericidal activity of isoniazid: Advances and implications for dosage adjustment
    Ningjian Cai, Xiaoyi Jiang, Chao Zhang +3
    Biosafety and HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseDOAJEurope PMCPMC
  5. Type I interferon upregulates IL-18RAP in neutrophils to enhance chemotaxis and bactericidal activity in autoimmune liver diseases.
    Wenwen Jin, Xi Su, Lizhi Liu +4
    Journal of translational autoimmunityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{mcclean2026modeling,
  title = {{Modeling Treatment Response in Tuberculosis Early Bactericidal Activity Trials}},
  author = {Mairi C. W. McClean and Simon E. Koele and Julia Dreisbach and Susanne Mirold‐Mei and Fred Njeleka and Daniel Mapamba and Bariki Mtafya and Patrick P. J. Phillips and Veronique R. De Jager and Rodney Dawson and Kim Narunsky and Andreas H. Diacon and Elin M. Svensson and Norbert Heinrich and Francesco Paolo Casale and Michael Hoelscher},
  journal = {CPT: Pharmacometrics \& Systems Pharmacology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1002/psp4.70311},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70311},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Modeling Treatment Response in Tuberculosis Early Bactericidal Activity Trials
AU  - Mairi C. W. McClean
AU  - Simon E. Koele
AU  - Julia Dreisbach
AU  - Susanne Mirold‐Mei
AU  - Fred Njeleka
AU  - Daniel Mapamba
AU  - Bariki Mtafya
AU  - Patrick P. J. Phillips
AU  - Veronique R. De Jager
AU  - Rodney Dawson
AU  - Kim Narunsky
AU  - Andreas H. Diacon
AU  - Elin M. Svensson
AU  - Norbert Heinrich
AU  - Francesco Paolo Casale
AU  - Michael Hoelscher
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/07
JO  - CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology
DO  - 10.1002/psp4.70311
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70311
AB  - Culture‐based monitoring of bacterial load is slow and susceptible to missing data, contributing to the length and cost of TB clinical trials. Non‐culture‐based alternatives, like the Tuberculosis Molecular Load Bacterial Assay (TB‐MBLA), could represent a solution. Our objectives were to evaluate TB‐MBLA as a biomarker in early bactericidal activity (EBA) studies and explore whether combining biomarkers with joint modeling could provide insight into underlying biological processes. We generated TB‐MBLA (LifeArc) data from sputum samples from all 78 patients from the PanACEA BTZ‐043 Phase Ib/IIa trial and derived a summary measure of the joint distribution of the three TB‐MBLA, colony forming units (CFU), and time‐to‐positivity (TTP) biomarkers as the first principal component derived from a probabilistic principal component analysis (pPCA). With TB‐MBLA marker and the principal component 1 (PC1) values, we reevaluated the original stage IIa dose–response and stages Ib/IIa pharmacokinetics—pharmacodynamics (PK‐PD) exposure‐response analyses, applying linear and non‐linear mixed models, respectively. For TB‐MBLA, we could not detect an exposure‐response effect in the PK‐PD analysis, in contrast with CFU and TTP. When combining biomarkers, we observed a significant but less pronounced E max exposure–response between days 0–3 compared with CFU and TTP alone. We also successfully applied pPCA as a modeling framework and show evidence that combining CFU and TTP in a joint latent component can improve detection of treatment effects compared with either biomarker alone. In this study, we present novel EBA data for the first‐in‐class antimycobacterial compound BTZ‐043 and contextualize the value of emerging bacteriological markers within the EBA trial framework.  Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04044001
SN  - 2163-8306
ER  -