PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv
An Erdős-Pach-Pollack-Tuza theorem for oriented diameter
Abstract
The oriented diameter of a bridgeless graph is the minimum diameter of its strong orientations. Erdős, Pach, Pollack and Tuza proved that every connected graph of order n and minimum degree δ≥ 2 has diameter at most 3n/(δ+1)−1, which is sharp up to an additive constant. Cochran and Wang conjectured that the oriented diameter obeys the same bound up to an absolute additive constant. We prove this conjecture: every bridgeless graph of order n and minimum degree δ has a strong orientation of diameter at most 3n/(δ+1)+1017. Thus the bound of Erdős, Pach, Pollack and Tuza for the diameter carries over to the oriented diameter, with only the additive constant changed; in particular, the coefficient $3$ is best possible.
Related
BibTeX
@misc{ai2026erdőspachpollacktuza,
title = {{An Erdős-Pach-Pollack-Tuza theorem for oriented diameter}},
author = {Jiangdong Ai and Bin Chen and Yaokun Feng},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.03169},
eprint = {2611.03169},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03169},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - An Erdős-Pach-Pollack-Tuza theorem for oriented diameter
AU - Jiangdong Ai
AU - Bin Chen
AU - Yaokun Feng
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/02
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.03169
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03169
AB - The oriented diameter of a bridgeless graph is the minimum diameter of its strong orientations. Erdős, Pach, Pollack and Tuza proved that every connected graph of order n and minimum degree δ≥ 2 has diameter at most 3n/(δ+1)−1, which is sharp up to an additive constant. Cochran and Wang conjectured that the oriented diameter obeys the same bound up to an absolute additive constant. We prove this conjecture: every bridgeless graph of order n and minimum degree δ has a strong orientation of diameter at most 3n/(δ+1)+10^17. Thus the bound of Erdős, Pach, Pollack and Tuza for the diameter carries over to the oriented diameter, with only the additive constant changed; in particular, the coefficient $3$ is best possible.
ER -