Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 5 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Challenging the guidelines: longitudinal trends in left ventricular diameter and function in severe aortic regurgitation

  1. 1The Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital
  2. 2Affiliated with the Gray Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University
  3. 3The Faculty of Data and Decision Sciences, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) based on progressive changes in left ventricular (LV) function or size. We aimed to reassess the clinical relevance of current guideline recommendations pertaining to traditional echocardiographic measurements in routine practice.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with severe AR who underwent serial echocardiographic follow-up over at least 18 months. The composite outcome was symptom-driven AVR, acute heart failure hospitalization, or death. We used a joint modelling approach to handle within-subject correlation and censoring.

Results: The cohort consisted of 140 patients, with a median follow-up of 93 months (interquartile range 58–130). LV end-systolic (LVESD) and fractional shortening (FS) showed a small but statistically significant longitudinal trend, while LVEDD did not. In three separate joint models adjusted for age at onset and sex, higher LVESD and LVEDD and lower FS were each associated with increased risk of the composite event. Each 1 mm increase in LVESD and LVEDD was associated with a 6% in risk; each 1% decrease in FS corresponded to a 12% increase in risk. Only 8 (5.7%) of patients were predicted to exceed the guideline-recommended LVEDD threshold of 65 mm over 10 years. Age at onset was also a significant risk factor, with each decade increasing risk by 65% for each of the three parallel joint models.

Conclusion: LV parameters show modest changes over time, despite holding strong prognostic value in patients with severe AR. LVEDD, while associated with overall risk, does not predictably or significantly dilate over time in most patients. AVR decisions should be based on comprehensive clinical and volumetric assessment rather than waiting for simple linear progression to guideline cutoffs.

Related

  1. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of the association between aortic diameter and left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with bicuspid aortic valve
    Huan Liu, Xueting Guo, Kunxuan Liu +7
    Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgeryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologyEurope PMC
  2. Symptomatic Pulmonary Regurgitation Without Right Ventricular Enlargement Accompanied by Biventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and Related Diseases
    Sayuri Yamabe, Kiyomi Kayama, Yoshiro Tsuruta +14
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthJ-STAGE
  3. Impact of left ventricular reshaping on postinfarction functional mitral regurgitation in a chronic swine model of advanced heart failure.
    Kosuke Nakamae, Chihiro Miyagi, Junya Matsuda +7
    JTCVS openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  4. Aortic Regurgitation Jet Increases Left Ventricular Energy Loss Associated With the Progression of Cardiac Failure ― A Vector Flow Mapping Analysis Study ―
    Shohei Yoshida, Koichi Toda, Yasushi Yoshikawa +13
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  5. Cardiac MRI-derived extracellular volume fraction is associated with failed left ventricular reverse remodeling after aortic valve replacement in severe aortic regurgitation With a giant left ventricle
    Hao Niu, YangBo Yan, XiangFeng Gong +3
    Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cardiovascular medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{schwartzenberg2026challenging,
  title = {{Challenging the guidelines: longitudinal trends in left ventricular diameter and function in severe aortic regurgitation}},
  author = {Shmuel Schwartzenberg and Amit Berkowitz and Tsahi T. Lerman and Tamir Bental and Mordehay Vaturi and Yair Goldberg and Yaron Shapira},
  journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1975473},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1975473/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Challenging the guidelines: longitudinal trends in left ventricular diameter and function in severe aortic regurgitation
AU  - Shmuel Schwartzenberg
AU  - Amit Berkowitz
AU  - Tsahi T. Lerman
AU  - Tamir Bental
AU  - Mordehay Vaturi
AU  - Yair Goldberg
AU  - Yaron Shapira
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
JO  - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO  - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1975473
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1975473/full
AB  - Background: Guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) based on progressive changes in left ventricular (LV) function or size. We aimed to reassess the clinical relevance of current guideline recommendations pertaining to traditional echocardiographic measurements in routine practice.  Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with severe AR who underwent serial echocardiographic follow-up over at least 18 months. The composite outcome was symptom-driven AVR, acute heart failure hospitalization, or death. We used a joint modelling approach to handle within-subject correlation and censoring.  Results: The cohort consisted of 140 patients, with a median follow-up of 93 months (interquartile range 58–130). LV end-systolic (LVESD) and fractional shortening (FS) showed a small but statistically significant longitudinal trend, while LVEDD did not. In three separate joint models adjusted for age at onset and sex, higher LVESD and LVEDD and lower FS were each associated with increased risk of the composite event. Each 1 mm increase in LVESD and LVEDD was associated with a 6% in risk; each 1% decrease in FS corresponded to a 12% increase in risk. Only 8 (5.7%) of patients were predicted to exceed the guideline-recommended LVEDD threshold of 65 mm over 10 years. Age at onset was also a significant risk factor, with each decade increasing risk by 65% for each of the three parallel joint models.  Conclusion: LV parameters show modest changes over time, despite holding strong prognostic value in patients with severe AR. LVEDD, while associated with overall risk, does not predictably or significantly dilate over time in most patients. AVR decisions should be based on comprehensive clinical and volumetric assessment rather than waiting for simple linear progression to guideline cutoffs.
SN  - 2297-055X
ER  -