Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,783 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in endocrinology

Calendar month seasonality of HbA1c and its phase relationship with climatological temperature in 633,838 clinical measurements.

  1. 1Laboratory Department of Ruian People's Hospital, Zhejiang, Wenzhou, China.

Abstract

Objective

HbA1c reflects glucose exposure over the preceding 8-12 weeks. We characterised the lagged seasonal association between monthly climatological temperature normals and HbA1c in a 12-year hospital cohort and examined whether a similar pattern was present in patient-level records.Research design and methods

We analysed 633,838 HbA1c measurements (387,678 patients; 633,737 with complete covariates) from a Chinese tertiary hospital (2014-2025). Cross-correlation was assessed for lags of 0-6 months using monthly HbA1c means and fixed monthly climatological temperature normals. Patient-level distributed-lag regression with cluster-robust standard errors and generalised estimating equations was used as a complementary analysis.Results

HbA1c was inversely correlated with the climatological temperature series most strongly at a 2-month lag (r = -0.297, P < 0.001) rather than concurrently (r = -0.127, P = 0.14). Pooled by calendar month, the lag-2 seasonal association was strong (r = -0.977, R² = 0.955), with a seasonal HbA1c amplitude of 0.235% (2.6 mmol/mol; peak March, trough September), strongest under age 60 and attenuated during COVID-19. Patient-level regression showed a similar lag pattern, with the largest coefficient at lag 2 (β = -0.0088% per °C; 95% CI -0.0093 to -0.0082; P < 0.001), and the individual-level partial R² was 0.15%.Conclusions

The study identified a reproducible seasonal HbA1c pattern that aligned most strongly with the 2-month-shifted climatological temperature series, with significant correspondence also at 1 and 3 months. Because the exposure was a fixed calendar-month normal, the findings should be interpreted as a lagged seasonal association rather than evidence of a causal temperature effect or a specific 2-month biological delay. The small individual-level partial R² (0.15%) also argues against applying the population amplitude directly to individual treatment decisions. Future research should evaluate whether seasonal contextualisation can optimise laboratory monitoring and re-testing strategies near diagnostic thresholds.

Related

  1. Hip fracture seasonality in a mild climate: the joint association of daylight duration and temperature
    Akeem A. Williams, Lauren Claravall, Madison T. Alexander +7
    Archives of osteoporosisPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaPMC
  2. The Relationship Between Breast Milk Adipocytokine Levels and Anthropometric Measurements of SGA Infants in the First Year of Life
    Zeynep Yılmaz Öztorun, Fatih Kardaş, Nihal Hatipoğlu +3
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  3. Examining the relationship between temperature and firearm violence: A comparison of metrics
    Hao Zhang, Bryce Hruska
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  4. Calendar-Period Variation in the Association Between Documented Complete Rotavirus Vaccination and Laboratory-Confirmed Gastroenteritis: An 11-Year Test-Negative Study
    Yunus Nas, Basri Çakıroğlu
    Pediatric reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Optimal timing of adjuvant immunotherapy after radical cystectomy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: from calendar-based to MRD-guided decision making
    Nabih Naim, Ahmad Saad, Nesrine Mohamad +1
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefPMC
BibTeX
@article{li2026calendar,
  title = {{Calendar month seasonality of HbA1c and its phase relationship with climatological temperature in 633,838 clinical measurements.}},
  author = {Kecheng Li and Fei Xia},
  journal = {Frontiers in endocrinology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fendo.2026.1990386},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908711},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Calendar month seasonality of HbA1c and its phase relationship with climatological temperature in 633,838 clinical measurements.
AU  - Kecheng Li
AU  - Fei Xia
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Frontiers in endocrinology
DO  - 10.3389/fendo.2026.1990386
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908711
AB  - Objective  HbA1c reflects glucose exposure over the preceding 8-12 weeks. We characterised the lagged seasonal association between monthly climatological temperature normals and HbA1c in a 12-year hospital cohort and examined whether a similar pattern was present in patient-level records.Research design and methods  We analysed 633,838 HbA1c measurements (387,678 patients; 633,737 with complete covariates) from a Chinese tertiary hospital (2014-2025). Cross-correlation was assessed for lags of 0-6 months using monthly HbA1c means and fixed monthly climatological temperature normals. Patient-level distributed-lag regression with cluster-robust standard errors and generalised estimating equations was used as a complementary analysis.Results  HbA1c was inversely correlated with the climatological temperature series most strongly at a 2-month lag (r = -0.297, P < 0.001) rather than concurrently (r = -0.127, P = 0.14). Pooled by calendar month, the lag-2 seasonal association was strong (r = -0.977, R² = 0.955), with a seasonal HbA1c amplitude of 0.235% (2.6 mmol/mol; peak March, trough September), strongest under age 60 and attenuated during COVID-19. Patient-level regression showed a similar lag pattern, with the largest coefficient at lag 2 (β = -0.0088% per °C; 95% CI -0.0093 to -0.0082; P < 0.001), and the individual-level partial R² was 0.15%.Conclusions  The study identified a reproducible seasonal HbA1c pattern that aligned most strongly with the 2-month-shifted climatological temperature series, with significant correspondence also at 1 and 3 months. Because the exposure was a fixed calendar-month normal, the findings should be interpreted as a lagged seasonal association rather than evidence of a causal temperature effect or a specific 2-month biological delay. The small individual-level partial R² (0.15%) also argues against applying the population amplitude directly to individual treatment decisions. Future research should evaluate whether seasonal contextualisation can optimise laboratory monitoring and re-testing strategies near diagnostic thresholds.
SN  - 1664-2392
ER  -