Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYEuropean heart journal open

Sex differences in the diabetes-related risk of incident myocardial infarction and relationship to established coronary heart disease risk factors: the Tromsø Study (1979–2016)

Abstract

Aims: To examine whether the adverse effect of diabetes on the risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI) differs between sexes and assess to what extent established coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors contribute to the elevated risk.

Methods and results: Prospective study of 42 907 Tromsø Study participants (51.5% women) with 3942 incident MI (357 with diabetes) at ages 35–104 years. Relative risks [incidence rate ratio (IRR)] were estimated in Poisson regression analyses. Impact of CHD risk factors was quantified as a percentage change in the regression coefficient for diabetes. A contrast in risk of MI by diabetes status was seen from age 45 years in men and 55 years in women. Adjusted for age and birth cohort, the IRR was 2.26 in women and 1.84 in men (P = 0.12, test for interaction). In a mutually adjusted model, adjustment for the triglyceride-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio weakened the association with diabetes similarly in women (−19.0%) and men (−17.0%); systolic blood pressure had a larger impact in women (−10.3% vs. +2.2%), whereas smoking strengthened the association more in men (+23.1% vs. +7.1%). Body mass index had a minor impact. A larger joint impact of adjustment factors in women (−33.6% vs. −15.9%) narrowed the initial gender gap (adjusted IRR of 1.72 and 1.67, respectively). Adverse lipid levels and increasing systolic blood pressure emerged already during the pre-diabetic phase.

Conclusion: Traditional CHD risk factors contributed substantially to the diabetes-related risk of incident MI. A larger joint impact of these factors in women reduced the initial observed sex difference in the adverse effect of diabetes.

Related

  1. Mortality risk stratification in contemporary myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: development of AMICS-ADMIT prediction model and benchmarking of established scores.
    Klevis Mihali, Birgit Markus, Kornelia Neuner +7
    International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculaturePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. The relationship between endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events in acute myocardial infarction patients admitted in emergency department.
    Yan Cao, Bowen Xiong, Tangyi Zeng +3
    BMC emergency medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMCPMC
  3. Differences in treatment and outcome of patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI in Germany
    Stefan A. Lange, Christiane Engelbertz, Lena Makowski +6
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCardiovascular medicinePLOS
  4. Impact of Empagliflozin on mRNA Levels of Cardiotrophin-1 and GDF-15 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing PCI: A Double-Blind Pilot Trial.
    Reza Rastgoo, Mahnaz Yousefi Ramandi, Fereshteh Ebrahimi +3
    Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic researchPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and the risk of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with acute myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Chunqin Hu, Wenming Zhao, Shasha Xiao +3
    BMC cardiovascular disordersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{albrektsen2026differences,
  title = {{Sex differences in the diabetes-related risk of incident myocardial infarction and relationship to established coronary heart disease risk factors: the Tromsø Study (1979–2016)}},
  author = {Grethe Albrektsen and Tom Wilsgaard and Ivar Heuch and Dag S Thelle and Maja-Lisa Løchen and Sameline Grimsgaard and Kaare H Bønaa},
  journal = {European heart journal open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/ehjopen/oeag174},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728337},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sex differences in the diabetes-related risk of incident myocardial infarction and relationship to established coronary heart disease risk factors: the Tromsø Study (1979–2016)
AU  - Grethe Albrektsen
AU  - Tom Wilsgaard
AU  - Ivar Heuch
AU  - Dag S Thelle
AU  - Maja-Lisa Løchen
AU  - Sameline Grimsgaard
AU  - Kaare H Bønaa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - European heart journal open
DO  - 10.1093/ehjopen/oeag174
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13728337
AB  - Aims: To examine whether the adverse effect of diabetes on the risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI) differs between sexes and assess to what extent established coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors contribute to the elevated risk.  Methods and results: Prospective study of 42 907 Tromsø Study participants (51.5% women) with 3942 incident MI (357 with diabetes) at ages 35–104 years. Relative risks [incidence rate ratio (IRR)] were estimated in Poisson regression analyses. Impact of CHD risk factors was quantified as a percentage change in the regression coefficient for diabetes. A contrast in risk of MI by diabetes status was seen from age 45 years in men and 55 years in women. Adjusted for age and birth cohort, the IRR was 2.26 in women and 1.84 in men (P = 0.12, test for interaction). In a mutually adjusted model, adjustment for the triglyceride-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio weakened the association with diabetes similarly in women (−19.0%) and men (−17.0%); systolic blood pressure had a larger impact in women (−10.3% vs. +2.2%), whereas smoking strengthened the association more in men (+23.1% vs. +7.1%). Body mass index had a minor impact. A larger joint impact of adjustment factors in women (−33.6% vs. −15.9%) narrowed the initial gender gap (adjusted IRR of 1.72 and 1.67, respectively). Adverse lipid levels and increasing systolic blood pressure emerged already during the pre-diabetic phase.  Conclusion: Traditional CHD risk factors contributed substantially to the diabetes-related risk of incident MI. A larger joint impact of these factors in women reduced the initial observed sex difference in the adverse effect of diabetes.
SN  - 2752-4191
ER  -