Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Aerosol–cloud interactions influence the climate response to AMOC weakening

  1. 1ETH Zurich (Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) strongly influences regional climate, yet how atmospheric aerosols and aerosol–cloud interactions respond to its weakening remains largely unexplored. Using an aerosol-climate model, we examine how a 60 % AMOC weakening affects aerosols, clouds, and radiation. The weakening drives a hemispheric aerosol redistribution through purely dynamical pathways, increasing the Northern Hemisphere aerosol burden by 41 % through enhanced Saharan dust emissions and longer lifetimes under suppressed wet deposition. Averaged over 40–90° N, in-cloud droplet number increases by 10 % in warm clouds and 11 % in mixed-phase clouds, while enhanced dust ice-nucleating particles raise mixed-phase ice crystal number by 32 % , promoting the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen process and reducing mixed-phase total water path by 8 % . A kernel decomposition shows substantial regional cloud radiative responses, particularly over the North Atlantic, but opposing contributions largely cancel in the global mean, leaving a small net cloud radiative response of +0.21Wm-2. This near cancellation reflects subpolar low-cloud brightening offset by optical thinning of mixed-phase and ice clouds, partly driven by dust-induced glaciation, together with opposing tropical cloud changes from the southward ITCZ shift. This small global mean cloud contribution contrasts with previous studies of AMOC weakening, in which cloud changes contribute a net positive radiative feedback on the surface response. Of the cloud, aerosol and surface-albedo contributions diagnosed here, the largest effect comes from the enhanced shortwave reflection by expanded sea-ice and snow cover (−0.83 W m ⁻² ), followed by the effective radiative forcing due to dust aerosol–radiation interactions (ERFari, −0.23 W m ⁻² ). Combined with the cloud contribution, these terms sum to −0.86 W m ⁻² . This estimate excludes the longwave response to the cooling, including the Planck and lapse-rate responses, which is not decomposed here.

Versions

Related

  1. Influence of fluid chemical composition on fracture toughness and frictional strength weakening: Sandstone brittle and ductile strength constraints
    Corentin Noël, Patrick Baud, Francesco Lazari +2
    International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  2. Anthropogenic aerosol reduction contributes to faster flash drought onset in a changing climate
    Jia Wei, Shuo Wang, Weiguang Wang +3
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  3. Forcing closure suggests stronger aerosol forcing and higher climate sensitivity than the consensus
    Tianle Yuan, Hua Song, Senne Van Loon +3
    Science AdvancesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textClimate scienceCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Source-dependent organic aerosol hygroscopicity in eastern China: observational evidence for conditional enhancement under biomass-burning influence
    Yunfei Wu, Jiwei Li, Zhisheng Zhang +4
    Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryAtmospheric science & meteorologyCopernicusCrossrefDOAJ
  5. Anthropogenic aerosol forcing of European windstorms in CMIP6 climate models
    Stephen Cusack
    Natural Hazards and Earth System SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
BibTeX
@article{vella2026aerosolcloud,
  title = {{Aerosol–cloud interactions influence the climate response to AMOC weakening}},
  author = {Ryan Vella and Ulrike Lohmann},
  journal = {Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5194/acp-26-14939-2026},
  url = {https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14939/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Aerosol–cloud interactions influence the climate response to AMOC weakening
AU  - Ryan Vella
AU  - Ulrike Lohmann
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
DO  - 10.5194/acp-26-14939-2026
UR  - https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/14939/2026/
AB  - The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) strongly influences regional climate, yet how atmospheric aerosols and aerosol–cloud interactions respond to its weakening remains largely unexplored. Using an aerosol-climate model, we examine how a 60 % AMOC weakening affects aerosols, clouds, and radiation. The weakening drives a hemispheric aerosol redistribution through purely dynamical pathways, increasing the Northern Hemisphere aerosol burden by 41 % through enhanced Saharan dust emissions and longer lifetimes under suppressed wet deposition. Averaged over 40–90° N, in-cloud droplet number increases by 10 % in warm clouds and 11 % in mixed-phase clouds, while enhanced dust ice-nucleating particles raise mixed-phase ice crystal number by 32 % , promoting the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen process and reducing mixed-phase total water path by 8 % . A kernel decomposition shows substantial regional cloud radiative responses, particularly over the North Atlantic, but opposing contributions largely cancel in the global mean, leaving a small net cloud radiative response of +0.21Wm-2. This near cancellation reflects subpolar low-cloud brightening offset by optical thinning of mixed-phase and ice clouds, partly driven by dust-induced glaciation, together with opposing tropical cloud changes from the southward ITCZ shift. This small global mean cloud contribution contrasts with previous studies of AMOC weakening, in which cloud changes contribute a net positive radiative feedback on the surface response. Of the cloud, aerosol and surface-albedo contributions diagnosed here, the largest effect comes from the enhanced shortwave reflection by expanded sea-ice and snow cover (−0.83 W m ⁻² ), followed by the effective radiative forcing due to dust aerosol–radiation interactions (ERFari, −0.23 W m ⁻² ). Combined with the cloud contribution, these terms sum to −0.86 W m ⁻² . This estimate excludes the longwave response to the cooling, including the Planck and lapse-rate responses, which is not decomposed here.
SN  - 1680-7324
SN  - 1680-7316
ER  -