Accelerometry-Based and Gyroscope-Based Detection of Sleep Apnea Events: Systematic Review of Technical and Clinical Evidence.
- 1Digital Medicine, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, 33615, Germany, 49 0521106 ext 86 7 14.
Abstract
Background
Sleep apnea is a common but frequently underdiagnosed disorder associated with increased cardiovascular and metabolic risk. Although polysomnography remains the diagnostic gold standard, its high cost, technical complexity, and limited availability restrict large-scale screening and continuous monitoring. Accelerometry-based and gyroscope-based approaches may represent a simplified alternative that can also be applied in home-based settings.Objective
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the technical and clinical evidence for accelerometry-based and gyroscope-based detection of apnea and hypopnea events and to assess their potential clinical applicability.Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted on April 12, 2025, in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Studies investigating accelerometers, gyroscopes, inertial measurement units, seismocardiography, or ballistocardiography for apnea or hypopnea detection were included. Extracted data comprised study characteristics, sensor configurations, signal processing approaches, validation strategies, diagnostic performance, and clinical applicability. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.Results
A total of 46 studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included. Most studies used accelerometers as the primary sensing modality, whereas gyroscopes were mainly applied in multimodal inertial measurement unit systems. Binary classification between apnea and nonapnea phases was the predominant analytical approach. Reported sensitivities ranged from 30% to 99%, depending on study settings, validation strategies, and evaluation levels. High diagnostic performance was mainly observed in simulation-based studies under controlled conditions. The included studies differed considerably in sensor placement, sampling frequencies, preprocessing pipelines, segmentation strategies, validation procedures, and reference standards. Only a minority of studies used polysomnography as the reference standard or included clinically representative populations. Furthermore, limited external validation, insufficient reproducibility, and a high risk of bias reduced comparability and clinical transferability.Conclusions
Current evidence supports the feasibility of accelerometer-based respiratory monitoring for sleep apnea screening, particularly in wearable and home-monitoring settings. However, most available studies were conducted under controlled experimental conditions and included only limited clinical validation. Standardized validation procedures and clinically representative cohorts are necessary to improve comparability and clinical transferability.
Related
- Technical overview and clinical outcomes of transabdominal strategies to eliminate or neutralize staple-line intersection during low anterior resection: a systematic review.
- Preservation of Non-nidal Medial Veins During Microsurgical Resection of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Technical Considerations and Early Clinical Outcomes
- Deep-Learning-Based Assessment of Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography: Technical Validation, Cardiovascular Prognostic Value, and Clinical Translation—A Narrative Review
- Delayed Retention of Technical Surgical Skills Following Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed-Reality Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Retrieval-augmented generation in medicine: A scoping review of technical implementations, clinical applications, and ethical considerations
BibTeX
@article{werle2026accelerometrybased,
title = {{Accelerometry-Based and Gyroscope-Based Detection of Sleep Apnea Events: Systematic Review of Technical and Clinical Evidence.}},
author = {Ruben Werle and Ruben Kuhlmann and Urs-Vito Albrecht},
journal = {JMIR biomedical engineering},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.2196/104899},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42954060},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Accelerometry-Based and Gyroscope-Based Detection of Sleep Apnea Events: Systematic Review of Technical and Clinical Evidence.
AU - Ruben Werle
AU - Ruben Kuhlmann
AU - Urs-Vito Albrecht
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
JO - JMIR biomedical engineering
DO - 10.2196/104899
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42954060
AB - Background Sleep apnea is a common but frequently underdiagnosed disorder associated with increased cardiovascular and metabolic risk. Although polysomnography remains the diagnostic gold standard, its high cost, technical complexity, and limited availability restrict large-scale screening and continuous monitoring. Accelerometry-based and gyroscope-based approaches may represent a simplified alternative that can also be applied in home-based settings.Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the technical and clinical evidence for accelerometry-based and gyroscope-based detection of apnea and hypopnea events and to assess their potential clinical applicability.Methods A systematic literature search was conducted on April 12, 2025, in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Studies investigating accelerometers, gyroscopes, inertial measurement units, seismocardiography, or ballistocardiography for apnea or hypopnea detection were included. Extracted data comprised study characteristics, sensor configurations, signal processing approaches, validation strategies, diagnostic performance, and clinical applicability. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.Results A total of 46 studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included. Most studies used accelerometers as the primary sensing modality, whereas gyroscopes were mainly applied in multimodal inertial measurement unit systems. Binary classification between apnea and nonapnea phases was the predominant analytical approach. Reported sensitivities ranged from 30% to 99%, depending on study settings, validation strategies, and evaluation levels. High diagnostic performance was mainly observed in simulation-based studies under controlled conditions. The included studies differed considerably in sensor placement, sampling frequencies, preprocessing pipelines, segmentation strategies, validation procedures, and reference standards. Only a minority of studies used polysomnography as the reference standard or included clinically representative populations. Furthermore, limited external validation, insufficient reproducibility, and a high risk of bias reduced comparability and clinical transferability.Conclusions Current evidence supports the feasibility of accelerometer-based respiratory monitoring for sleep apnea screening, particularly in wearable and home-monitoring settings. However, most available studies were conducted under controlled experimental conditions and included only limited clinical validation. Standardized validation procedures and clinically representative cohorts are necessary to improve comparability and clinical transferability.
SN - 2561-3278
ER -