Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Outcomes of real-ear measurement-based fitting in unilateral hearing aid users: Influence of contralateral hearing

  • Jeon Mi Lee1
  • Tae Hoon Kong2
  • Jeong-woo Lee3
  • Hyun Jin Lee4
4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
  2. 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea
  3. 3Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea
  4. 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Open at sourcePDFDOICite

Abstract

Objectives: Real-ear measurement (REM) is commonly used to verify hearing aid fittings; however, its added benefit over non-REM fitting in unilateral users and the influence of contralateral ear hearing remain unclear. In this retrospective study, we compared short-term audiometric and patient-reported outcomes between an REM-based fitting pathway and a manufacturer-first-fit pathway followed by routine clinical fine-tuning in unilateral hearing-aid users, and examined associations with contralateral-ear hearing. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 105 unilateral hearing aid users with 3 months of follow-up (REM: n = 60; non-REM: n = 45). Baseline measures included pure-tone averages (PTA4) of the aided ear (i.e., the ear fitted with the hearing aid) and contralateral ear (i.e., the opposite ear), as well as the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE). Outcomes included sound-field functional gain (ΔPTA4), achievement of ≥10 dB gain, change in HHIE (ΔHHIE; responder ≥18-point reduction), and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) scores at 3 months. Group comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests, and multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for demographic and audiometric covariates. Associations between contralateral ear hearing and outcomes were examined using correlation and subgroup analyses. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between groups, although fitted side differed. At 3 months, mean functional gain was 11.0 ± 10.6 dB HL in the REM group and 9.1 ± 10.1 dB HL in the non-REM group (p = 0.2145). Mean ΔHHIE was 25.7 ± 30.3 and 32.9 ± 28.6 points (p = 0.1680), and mean IOI-HA scores were 24.4 ± 6.7 and 23.9 ± 5.9, respectively (p = 0.9492). In adjusted analyses, the REM-based fitting pathway was not associated with ΔHHIE (β = 1.97; 95% CI, −3.12 to 7.06) or 3-month IOI-HA score (β = 0.32; 95% CI, −2.23 to 2.86). Worse contralateral-ear PTA4 was associated with greater HHIE improvement (r = 0.389, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort of unilateral hearing-aid users, an REM-based fitting pathway was not associated with statistically significant 3-month audiometric or patient-reported outcome differences compared with manufacturer first-fit followed by routine fine-tuning; this does not establish equivalence or isolate the effect of REM. Contralateral-ear hearing was associated with perceived handicap improvement and may be relevant to outcome interpretation and counseling.

Related

  1. Premotor cortices differentially influence contralateral motor cortex
    Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  2. Refined anatomy-based fitting reduces interaural place mismatch and improves speech outcomes, with preliminary evidence for reduced listening effort
    Anja Kurz, Giovanna Castillo, Kristen Rak +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePhysiologyPLOS
  3. Unilateral MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy thalamotomy for refractory multiple sclerosis tremor: 12-month outcomes in four patients
    Mickael Aubignat, Mélissa Tir, Martial Ouendo +5
    Multiple Sclerosis and Related DisordersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceHAL
  4. Pain management in cancer patients: Could opioids or NSAIDs influence outcomes?
    Laura Smith, Ashly Mary Lal, Patrice Forget
    Best Practice & Research Clinical AnaesthesiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedGeneral biologyPharmacology & toxicologyHAL
  5. Influence of Dietary Rumen-Protected Choline and Nicotinic Acid Supplementation on Growth Outcomes and Meat Tenderness, Rumen Microbial Composition, and Serum Metabolomics of Late-Fattening Beef Cattle.
    Baochen Xu, Tianyu Gao, Xiaoyan Wang +7
    Animals : an open access journal from MDPIPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyEurope PMC

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{lee2026outcomes,
  title = {{Outcomes of real-ear measurement-based fitting in unilateral hearing aid users: Influence of contralateral hearing}},
  author = {Jeon Mi Lee and Tae Hoon Kong and Jeong-woo Lee and Hyun Jin Lee},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358875},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358875},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Outcomes of real-ear measurement-based fitting in unilateral hearing aid users: Influence of contralateral hearing
AU  - Jeon Mi Lee
AU  - Tae Hoon Kong
AU  - Jeong-woo Lee
AU  - Hyun Jin Lee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/24
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358875
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358875
AB  - Objectives: Real-ear measurement (REM) is commonly used to verify hearing aid fittings; however, its added benefit over non-REM fitting in unilateral users and the influence of contralateral ear hearing remain unclear. In this retrospective study, we compared short-term audiometric and patient-reported outcomes between an REM-based fitting pathway and a manufacturer-first-fit pathway followed by routine clinical fine-tuning in unilateral hearing-aid users, and examined associations with contralateral-ear hearing. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 105 unilateral hearing aid users with 3 months of follow-up (REM: n = 60; non-REM: n = 45). Baseline measures included pure-tone averages (PTA4) of the aided ear (i.e., the ear fitted with the hearing aid) and contralateral ear (i.e., the opposite ear), as well as the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE). Outcomes included sound-field functional gain (ΔPTA4), achievement of ≥10 dB gain, change in HHIE (ΔHHIE; responder ≥18-point reduction), and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) scores at 3 months. Group comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests, and multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for demographic and audiometric covariates. Associations between contralateral ear hearing and outcomes were examined using correlation and subgroup analyses. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between groups, although fitted side differed. At 3 months, mean functional gain was 11.0 ± 10.6 dB HL in the REM group and 9.1 ± 10.1 dB HL in the non-REM group (p = 0.2145). Mean ΔHHIE was 25.7 ± 30.3 and 32.9 ± 28.6 points (p = 0.1680), and mean IOI-HA scores were 24.4 ± 6.7 and 23.9 ± 5.9, respectively (p = 0.9492). In adjusted analyses, the REM-based fitting pathway was not associated with ΔHHIE (β = 1.97; 95% CI, −3.12 to 7.06) or 3-month IOI-HA score (β = 0.32; 95% CI, −2.23 to 2.86). Worse contralateral-ear PTA4 was associated with greater HHIE improvement (r = 0.389, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort of unilateral hearing-aid users, an REM-based fitting pathway was not associated with statistically significant 3-month audiometric or patient-reported outcome differences compared with manufacturer first-fit followed by routine fine-tuning; this does not establish equivalence or isolate the effect of REM. Contralateral-ear hearing was associated with perceived handicap improvement and may be relevant to outcome interpretation and counseling.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -