Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Quantifying the Hadamard Resilience Effect and the Coherence Gap in NISQ-Era Classifiers

Abstract

We report on a fundamental disparity between stochastic noise models and algorithmic performance in NISQ-era classifiers. Utilizing the ibm_kingston processor, we characterize the "Kingston Constant" (κ≈ 0.07), representing a 93% signal magnitude collapse. Despite this decay, we show via a hardware-calibrated stochastic digital twin that a Hadamard Test based Perceptron maintains a 93.9% accuracy for the MNIST dataset, validating our proposed Hadamard Resilience Effect under affine depolarization. Through parametric simulation, we establish a critical gate-noise threshold at λcrit ≈ 0.65 (corresponding to a critical signal retention αcrit ≈ 0.35) where topological rank preservation breaks down. Furthermore, physical execution at high feature depths (N = 256) reveals a systemic divergence---the ``Coherence Gap'' (Δρ≈ 0.91)---where physical hardware classification accuracy collapses to 53.0\% due to a ``Coherence Wall'' at a circuit depth (D ≈ 10k) exceeding the hardware's resilient depth limit (Dmax ≈ 3.5k). This gap is consistent with coherent phase errors and crosstalk being the dominant unmodeled contributors under the tested hardware configuration, establishing a predictive operational boundary for NISQ classification architectures.

Related

  1. Evaluation of Variational Quantum Classifiers (VQC) for Cyberattack Detection in the NISQ Era
    Angelos Thomos, Theodore Andronikos
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Quantum Simulation of Nuclear Shell Model Using GCM-Based Methods on NISQ Devices
    Durgesh Pandey, Ashutosh Singh, Ankit Kumar Das +1
    HALPreprintLicence not statedNuclear physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  3. Cavity mediated two-qubit gate: Tuning to optimal performance with NISQ era quantum simulations
    Shreekanth S. Yuvarajan, Vincent Iglesias-Cardinale, David Hucul +1
    Physical Review ResearchPeer-reviewedPublisher termsAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  4. On Performance and Limitations of Quantum Wave Packet Dynamics Simulated using NISQ Hardware
    Tamila Kuanysheva, Jonathan Andrade-Plascencia, Jayakrushna Sahoo +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Quantum limit cycles from phase coupling: A framework for NISQ thermodynamic devices
    Nana Siddhartha
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{silva2026quantifying,
  title = {{Quantifying the Hadamard Resilience Effect and the Coherence Gap in NISQ-Era Classifiers}},
  author = {Wladimir Silva},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.10638},
  eprint = {2605.10638},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10638},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantifying the Hadamard Resilience Effect and the Coherence Gap in NISQ-Era Classifiers
AU  - Wladimir Silva
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/08
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.10638
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10638
AB  - We report on a fundamental disparity between stochastic noise models and algorithmic performance in NISQ-era classifiers. Utilizing the ibm_kingston processor, we characterize the "Kingston Constant" (κ≈ 0.07), representing a 93% signal magnitude collapse. Despite this decay, we show via a hardware-calibrated stochastic digital twin that a Hadamard Test based Perceptron maintains a 93.9% accuracy for the MNIST dataset, validating our proposed Hadamard Resilience Effect under affine depolarization. Through parametric simulation, we establish a critical gate-noise threshold at λ_crit ≈ 0.65 (corresponding to a critical signal retention α_crit ≈ 0.35) where topological rank preservation breaks down. Furthermore, physical execution at high feature depths (N = 256) reveals a systemic divergence---the ``Coherence Gap'' (Δρ≈ 0.91)---where physical hardware classification accuracy collapses to 53.0\% due to a ``Coherence Wall'' at a circuit depth (D ≈ 10k) exceeding the hardware's resilient depth limit (D_max ≈ 3.5k). This gap is consistent with coherent phase errors and crosstalk being the dominant unmodeled contributors under the tested hardware configuration, establishing a predictive operational boundary for NISQ classification architectures.
ER  -