Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Geriatrics

Perceptions of older adults on chronic pain management in primary care settings

5 affiliations
  1. 1Pritzker School of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
  2. 2Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 3051, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
  3. 3Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
  4. 4Access Community Health Network, Chicago, IL USA
  5. 5Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain disproportionately affects older adults (age ≥ 65 years), and almost half of the United States older adult population reports chronic pain. Chronic pain is associated with decreased physical function and impairs activities of daily living. Improving Chicago Older Adult Opioid and Pain Management through Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support and Project ECHO® (I-COPE) was designed to develop effective pain management by studying patient goals, preferences, and comorbidities. I-COPE collects patient-reported data, implements clinical decision support tools, and provides primary care clinician education on evidence-based chronic pain treatments.

Objective: To explore the perspectives of older adults receiving chronic pain management in primary care and their views on I-COPE.

Design: I-COPE was implemented at 36 clinics within two healthcare systems in Chicago metropolitan area. Patients who met study criteria were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews.

Participants: Sixteen older adult patients with a high pain score, chronic pain, or opioid use disorder in the last year.

Approach: Patients were interviewed about their experiences with chronic pain management and their opinions about I-COPE until theme saturation was reached.

Key results: Participants described the effects of chronic pain, impacting mobility, daily activities, sleep, relationships, and wellbeing. Participants desired improved daily functioning, pain, and independence. They preferred treatments that increased physical activity, limited medications, and were not surgeries/procedures. During treatment decision-making, patients considered clinician recommendations, their goals, and current/past treatment effectiveness. Pain management satisfaction was associated with elements of shared decision making. Overall, participants believed that I-COPE tools could enhance clinician understanding of pain.

Conclusions: Older adult patients with chronic pain share pain management goals and treatment preferences similar to those reported in studies of primary care clinicians. Greater satisfaction with pain management was associated with shared decision-making principles. Patients held favorable opinions towards I-COPE in addressing barriers to pain management.

Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under #NCT04878562 on May 4, 2021.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08000-w.

Related

  1. Effectiveness of green health prescribing and nature-based interventions in primary care and community settings for older adults: a systematic review of health, wellbeing and social outcomes
    Furqan Butt, Jeremiah Donoghue, Cameron Ley +10
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  2. Prevalence and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease in Irish Primary Care Network
    B. M. Jacob, K. Eyers, D. Jin +8
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textGeneral medicinemedRxiv
  3. Chinese women's perceptions and needs regarding the AI-assisted tools for self-management of chronic perineal pain: a qualitative study.
    Weiwei Ding, Jiawen Wang, Yaping Hu +3
    BMC women's healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  4. Evaluating the accuracy of brief cognitive assessments for the early detection of cognitive impairment in adults across primary and specialty care settings: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Jennifer Loveless, Lauren Pilcher, Corey J. Bolton +17
    Alzheimer's & DementiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  5. Barriers and facilitators of conservative kidney management in older adults with chronic kidney failure: a qualitative study with nephrologists in Germany
    Janine Kaiser, Charlotte M. Kugler, Muhammad Helmi Barghouth +4
    BMC NephrologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{gopal2026perceptions,
  title = {{Perceptions of older adults on chronic pain management in primary care settings}},
  author = {Preethi Gopal and Ainur Kagarmanova and Erin Staab and Katherine Thompson and Mim Ari and Danielle Lazar and Linda Rosul and Anne Zhao and Neda Laiteerapong},
  journal = {BMC Geriatrics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12877-026-08000-w},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08000-w},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Perceptions of older adults on chronic pain management in primary care settings
AU  - Preethi Gopal
AU  - Ainur Kagarmanova
AU  - Erin Staab
AU  - Katherine Thompson
AU  - Mim Ari
AU  - Danielle Lazar
AU  - Linda Rosul
AU  - Anne Zhao
AU  - Neda Laiteerapong
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/31
JO  - BMC Geriatrics
DO  - 10.1186/s12877-026-08000-w
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08000-w
AB  - Background: Chronic pain disproportionately affects older adults (age ≥ 65 years), and almost half of the United States older adult population reports chronic pain. Chronic pain is associated with decreased physical function and impairs activities of daily living. Improving Chicago Older Adult Opioid and Pain Management through Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support and Project ECHO® (I-COPE) was designed to develop effective pain management by studying patient goals, preferences, and comorbidities. I-COPE collects patient-reported data, implements clinical decision support tools, and provides primary care clinician education on evidence-based chronic pain treatments.  Objective: To explore the perspectives of older adults receiving chronic pain management in primary care and their views on I-COPE.  Design: I-COPE was implemented at 36 clinics within two healthcare systems in Chicago metropolitan area. Patients who met study criteria were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews.  Participants: Sixteen older adult patients with a high pain score, chronic pain, or opioid use disorder in the last year.  Approach: Patients were interviewed about their experiences with chronic pain management and their opinions about I-COPE until theme saturation was reached.  Key results: Participants described the effects of chronic pain, impacting mobility, daily activities, sleep, relationships, and wellbeing. Participants desired improved daily functioning, pain, and independence. They preferred treatments that increased physical activity, limited medications, and were not surgeries/procedures. During treatment decision-making, patients considered clinician recommendations, their goals, and current/past treatment effectiveness. Pain management satisfaction was associated with elements of shared decision making. Overall, participants believed that I-COPE tools could enhance clinician understanding of pain.  Conclusions: Older adult patients with chronic pain share pain management goals and treatment preferences similar to those reported in studies of primary care clinicians. Greater satisfaction with pain management was associated with shared decision-making principles. Patients held favorable opinions towards I-COPE in addressing barriers to pain management.  Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under #NCT04878562 on May 4, 2021.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08000-w.
SN  - 1471-2318
ER  -