Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Insights into Imaging

A multicentre immersive virtual-world course for radiology residents: feasibility, educational outcomes, and participant perceptions

Abstract

Objectives: To design and implement an immersive course on plain radiograph interpretation for radiology residents within a three-dimensional virtual world and to evaluate its feasibility, participants’ perceptions, and short-term changes in knowledge-test performance.

Materials and methods: The course, delivered in a three-dimensional virtual world over 22 days, included seven 3-h synchronous sessions and asynchronous case-based activities. Educational outcomes were assessed using pre- and post-course multiple-choice tests. Participants’ experience was evaluated using 9-point Likert-scale items assessing cognitive load, perceived course level, and usefulness for clinical practice. After the course, participants completed an evaluation questionnaire including 5-point Likert-scale items, numerical ratings (0–10), and open-ended questions. Student’s t -test was used for continuous variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for ordinal data.

Results: Sixty-seven residents from 27 hospitals met the certification criterion across two editions in 2021 and 2022. Forty-seven completed both the pre- and post-course tests, with mean scores increasing from 60.4 ± 6.5% to 70.2 ± 9.0% ( p < 0.001). Participants reported positive perceptions, with high agreement for usefulness and adequacy (> 90%) and a mean usefulness score of 7.7 ± 1.2. Ratings were generally high (> 7/10), particularly for instructors, educational content, and course organisation, whereas interaction among participants received lower ratings.

Conclusions: Immersive online teaching in a three-dimensional virtual world is a feasible approach for radiology resident education. Participation in the course was associated with improved short-term performance on a repeated knowledge test and positive participant perceptions. This format may complement traditional teaching methods in cohorts composed predominantly of early-year radiology residents.

Key Points: Question Flexible educational approaches are needed to reinforce plain radiograph interpretation training among radiology residents, but evidence supporting virtual-world training remains limited.

Findings The virtual-world course was feasible and positively valued by participants, with participation associated with improved short-term performance on a repeated knowledge test.

Critical relevance statement Immersive teaching in a three-dimensional virtual world is a feasible and well-accepted approach that may complement plain radiograph interpretation training in cohorts composed predominantly of first and second-year radiology residents.

Related

  1. Exploring the feasibility and educational value of an immersive situational teaching method in a preclinical pathology observation program.
    Chun-Hua Wang, Mei Li, Jing-Dun Xie +4
    BMC medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  2. 3D-Printed Models as Catalysts for Neuroanatomy Learning: An Immersive Educational Experience for Medical Students
    Noé Pérez Carrillo, Dan López Vázquez, Erick David Muñoz Carpio +2
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Patient Perceptions of a Video‐Based Educational Platform for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Qualitative Study of the SMART‐PAH Course
    Denise G. Sese, Purnadeo Persaud, Lauryn Durham +3
    Pulmonary circulationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Student Perceptions on Educational Handovers from Medical School to Residency.
    Lauren S Starnes, Amy E Fleming, Kendra Parekh
    Medical science educatorPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  5. Robotic-arm-assisted versus conventional total knee replacement (RACER-Knee): a pragmatic, multicentre, participant-masked and assessor-masked, superiority, randomised controlled trial
    Helen M. Parsons, Andrew John Metcalfe, James Milton Griffin +97
    The LancetPeer-reviewedCC BY10 citedSurgery & anaesthesiaOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{pinopostigo2026multicentre,
  title = {{A multicentre immersive virtual-world course for radiology residents: feasibility, educational outcomes, and participant perceptions}},
  author = {Alberto Pino-Postigo and Dolores Domínguez-Pinos and Eugenio L. Navarro-Sanchis and Miguel J. Ruiz Gómez and Francisco Sendra-Portero},
  journal = {Insights into Imaging},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s13244-026-02455-6},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-026-02455-6},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - A multicentre immersive virtual-world course for radiology residents: feasibility, educational outcomes, and participant perceptions
AU  - Alberto Pino-Postigo
AU  - Dolores Domínguez-Pinos
AU  - Eugenio L. Navarro-Sanchis
AU  - Miguel J. Ruiz Gómez
AU  - Francisco Sendra-Portero
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Insights into Imaging
DO  - 10.1186/s13244-026-02455-6
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-026-02455-6
AB  - Objectives: To design and implement an immersive course on plain radiograph interpretation for radiology residents within a three-dimensional virtual world and to evaluate its feasibility, participants’ perceptions, and short-term changes in knowledge-test performance.  Materials and methods: The course, delivered in a three-dimensional virtual world over 22 days, included seven 3-h synchronous sessions and asynchronous case-based activities. Educational outcomes were assessed using pre- and post-course multiple-choice tests. Participants’ experience was evaluated using 9-point Likert-scale items assessing cognitive load, perceived course level, and usefulness for clinical practice. After the course, participants completed an evaluation questionnaire including 5-point Likert-scale items, numerical ratings (0–10), and open-ended questions. Student’s t -test was used for continuous variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for ordinal data.  Results: Sixty-seven residents from 27 hospitals met the certification criterion across two editions in 2021 and 2022. Forty-seven completed both the pre- and post-course tests, with mean scores increasing from 60.4 ± 6.5% to 70.2 ± 9.0% ( p < 0.001). Participants reported positive perceptions, with high agreement for usefulness and adequacy (> 90%) and a mean usefulness score of 7.7 ± 1.2. Ratings were generally high (> 7/10), particularly for instructors, educational content, and course organisation, whereas interaction among participants received lower ratings.  Conclusions: Immersive online teaching in a three-dimensional virtual world is a feasible approach for radiology resident education. Participation in the course was associated with improved short-term performance on a repeated knowledge test and positive participant perceptions. This format may complement traditional teaching methods in cohorts composed predominantly of early-year radiology residents.  Key Points: Question Flexible educational approaches are needed to reinforce plain radiograph interpretation training among radiology residents, but evidence supporting virtual-world training remains limited.  Findings The virtual-world course was feasible and positively valued by participants, with participation associated with improved short-term performance on a repeated knowledge test.  Critical relevance statement Immersive teaching in a three-dimensional virtual world is a feasible and well-accepted approach that may complement plain radiograph interpretation training in cohorts composed predominantly of first and second-year radiology residents.
SN  - 1869-4101
ER  -