Development of a phantom‐based end‐to‐end QA workflow for online adaptive radiotherapy incorporating high‐resolution 2D detector measurements
- 1Department of Radiation Oncology University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
- 2IBA Dosimetry GmbH Schwarzenbruck Germany
Abstract
Background: Online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) accounts for anatomical changes by adjusting treatment plans on a daily basis. However, comprehensive plan‐specific quality assurance (QA) is challenging, as pre‐treatment measurements cannot be performed with the patient on the treatment couch. Therefore, an end‐to‐end QA approach, covering imaging, contouring, plan adaptation, dose calculation, and delivery, is essential to ensure accurate and reliable oART.
Purpose: To develop and evaluate an end‐to‐end QA workflow for oART, incorporating high‐resolution detector‐based 2D dose verification and interchangeable phantom inserts.
Methods: A novel QA workflow was implemented using the myQA® SRS phantom with a 2D CMOS detector and a 3D‐printed anthropomorphic pelvis insert. A virtually deformed planning CT was generated to simulate anatomical changes and used as input for the adaptive workflow. The process included CBCT acquisition, manual contour adaptation, plan generation, dose delivery, and comparison of measured and calculated dose distributions via Gamma Analysis. Workflow feasibility was tested through repeated measurements. Error detectability was evaluated by altering gantry/collimator angles, monitor units (MU), phantom positioning, and CBCT presets. Confidence limits, calculated following AAPM TG‐119 methodology, were used as plan‐specific thresholds for evaluating Gamma Pass Rates (GPR). Corresponding dose‐volume histogram (DVH) parameters, using D98% for the planning target volume (PTV) and V95% for organs at risk (OARs), were calculated.
Results: Ethos auto‐contouring did not perform reliably on the phantom geometry, necessitating manual contouring. All workflow repetitions produced high GPR values for 3 %/2 mm, 2 %/2 mm, 3 %/1 mm, and 2 %/1 mm global criteria between measured and calculated dose. Confidence limits served as effective thresholds for identifying plan deviations. Introduced errors, including gantry angle deviations > 3° and collimator angle deviations ≥ 3°, MU variations ≥ 3 %, incorrect CBCT presets, and 3 mm setup shifts, were clearly detectable across all criteria. Smaller deviations, such as 1° angular changes or 1 % MU variation, resulting in minor dosimetric effects residing at or below 1.2 % for the PTV and 5.6 % for OARs, yielded GPR values above the Confidence limit.
Conclusions: The proposed workflow is feasible, reproducible, and capable of reliably identifying plan‐specific deviations in Ethos oART. High‐resolution 2D measurements and dose comparison provided robust verification of adaptive dose calculation and delivery. While limited by manual contouring and data‐handling constraints inherent to the Ethos platform, this method represents a practical end‐to‐end QA approach for clinical oART implementation.
Related
- High-resolution measurements of thermal conductivity matrix and search for thermal Hall effect in La2CuO4
- Energy, time, and position resolution measurements of an array of large tapered LYSO crystals
- NIMROD-to-IMAS workflow for extended-magnetohydrodynamic data with reusable datasets and implications for IMAS schema development
- CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy and automated radiotherapy decision-making systems: development and current status
- Automated Radiotherapy Planning for Head-and-neck Cancer: Multi-institutional Development, Validation, and Clinical Implementation of Monaco Scripting
BibTeX
@article{niedling2026development,
title = {{Development of a phantom‐based end‐to‐end QA workflow for online adaptive radiotherapy incorporating high‐resolution 2D detector measurements}},
author = {Julian Niedling and Robert Schindhelm and Luis Cervantes and Gary Razinskas and Sonja Wegener},
journal = {Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1002/acm2.70898},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70898},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Development of a phantom‐based end‐to‐end QA workflow for online adaptive radiotherapy incorporating high‐resolution 2D detector measurements
AU - Julian Niedling
AU - Robert Schindhelm
AU - Luis Cervantes
AU - Gary Razinskas
AU - Sonja Wegener
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
DO - 10.1002/acm2.70898
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70898
AB - Background: Online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) accounts for anatomical changes by adjusting treatment plans on a daily basis. However, comprehensive plan‐specific quality assurance (QA) is challenging, as pre‐treatment measurements cannot be performed with the patient on the treatment couch. Therefore, an end‐to‐end QA approach, covering imaging, contouring, plan adaptation, dose calculation, and delivery, is essential to ensure accurate and reliable oART. Purpose: To develop and evaluate an end‐to‐end QA workflow for oART, incorporating high‐resolution detector‐based 2D dose verification and interchangeable phantom inserts. Methods: A novel QA workflow was implemented using the myQA® SRS phantom with a 2D CMOS detector and a 3D‐printed anthropomorphic pelvis insert. A virtually deformed planning CT was generated to simulate anatomical changes and used as input for the adaptive workflow. The process included CBCT acquisition, manual contour adaptation, plan generation, dose delivery, and comparison of measured and calculated dose distributions via Gamma Analysis. Workflow feasibility was tested through repeated measurements. Error detectability was evaluated by altering gantry/collimator angles, monitor units (MU), phantom positioning, and CBCT presets. Confidence limits, calculated following AAPM TG‐119 methodology, were used as plan‐specific thresholds for evaluating Gamma Pass Rates (GPR). Corresponding dose‐volume histogram (DVH) parameters, using D98% for the planning target volume (PTV) and V95% for organs at risk (OARs), were calculated. Results: Ethos auto‐contouring did not perform reliably on the phantom geometry, necessitating manual contouring. All workflow repetitions produced high GPR values for 3 %/2 mm, 2 %/2 mm, 3 %/1 mm, and 2 %/1 mm global criteria between measured and calculated dose. Confidence limits served as effective thresholds for identifying plan deviations. Introduced errors, including gantry angle deviations > 3° and collimator angle deviations ≥ 3°, MU variations ≥ 3 %, incorrect CBCT presets, and 3 mm setup shifts, were clearly detectable across all criteria. Smaller deviations, such as 1° angular changes or 1 % MU variation, resulting in minor dosimetric effects residing at or below 1.2 % for the PTV and 5.6 % for OARs, yielded GPR values above the Confidence limit. Conclusions: The proposed workflow is feasible, reproducible, and capable of reliably identifying plan‐specific deviations in Ethos oART. High‐resolution 2D measurements and dose comparison provided robust verification of adaptive dose calculation and delivery. While limited by manual contouring and data‐handling constraints inherent to the Ethos platform, this method represents a practical end‐to‐end QA approach for clinical oART implementation.
SN - 1526-9914
ER -