Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)

Mechanical and Gravimetric Response of Surgical Suture Biomaterials to Commercial Mouthrinses During Static In Vitro Exposure.

  1. 1Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45C, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.
  2. 2Digital Dentistry Lab, Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiodiagnostics, Faculty of Medical Dentistry, Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.
  3. 3Department of Computerization and Robotics of Production, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.

Abstract

Surgical sutures are temporary load-bearing biomaterials whose performance in the oral cavity may be altered by postoperative mouthrinses. Seven USP 4-0 suture materials were immersed in four commercial mouthrinses for 3, 7, 10, and 14 days in a balanced factorial design (n = 3 per condition), with artificial saliva as a time-matched reference. Maximum breaking force (Fmax), apparent wet-state mass change, and solution pH were evaluated, and Day 14 re-dried mass was determined in an additional cohort (n = 5). Fmax was significantly affected by material, mouthrinse, time, and all interaction terms (p < 0.001), with material showing the largest main effect (partial η² = 0.957). Mean Fmax decreased by 57.1% for PGA and 53.3% for PGLA between Days 3 and 14 when averaged across mouthrinses. PGLA also declined in artificial saliva (-49.1%), showing that temporal loss was not exclusive to mouthrinse exposure. Mean apparent wet-state mass change ranged from 85.1% for silk to 8.5% for nylon 66 and showed a weak pooled association with Fmax (r = -0.163, p = 0.086); suture-related pH shifts were small. Under static immersion, response was specific to the material-formulation pair and evolved with time. Continuous immersion without medium renewal or prior salivary conditioning does not reproduce intermittent clinical mouthrinse use.

Related

  1. Prospective multicentric validation of a novel uroflowmetry device (Pflow™) against conventional gravimetric uroflowmetry.
    Arvind P Ganpule, Ashish Rawandale-Patil, Kavan Anil Takvani +3
    Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Structure-based mechanical properties of human carotid arteries and their effect on stress-strain response
    Anna Hrubanová, Zdeněk Bednařík, Robert Staffa +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  3. Advancing regenerative biomaterials and translational strategies in orthopaedic traumatology.
    Vu Le, J Tracy Watson, Sara McBride-Gagyi +4
    OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic traumaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCDOAJPMC
  4. Comparative Assessment of Fungal Biofilm Development on PEEK and PDMS Biomaterials and the Antifungal Potential of TiO₂/ZrO₂-Coated PEEK.
    Gabriela Angeles-de Paz, Luisa Ixchel Perez-Garcia, Fernando Torres-Ariza +5
    Materials (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMC
  5. Hyaluronic Acid-Based Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering: From Molecular Properties to Re-Generative Applications
    Chao-Ming Su, Ming‐You Shie, Wan-Ni Huang +4
    Journal of Functional BiomaterialsPeer-reviewedCC BY7 citedMaterials & polymersGeneral medicineOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{choszczyk2026mechanical,
  title = {{Mechanical and Gravimetric Response of Surgical Suture Biomaterials to Commercial Mouthrinses During Static In Vitro Exposure.}},
  author = {Alicja Choszczyk and Anna Ciołko and Wiktoria Nowak and Leszek Szalewski and Ewelina Kosicka and Żaneta Anna Mierzejewska},
  journal = {Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/bioengineering13101178},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42939033},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mechanical and Gravimetric Response of Surgical Suture Biomaterials to Commercial Mouthrinses During Static In Vitro Exposure.
AU  - Alicja Choszczyk
AU  - Anna Ciołko
AU  - Wiktoria Nowak
AU  - Leszek Szalewski
AU  - Ewelina Kosicka
AU  - Żaneta Anna Mierzejewska
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
JO  - Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)
DO  - 10.3390/bioengineering13101178
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42939033
AB  - Surgical sutures are temporary load-bearing biomaterials whose performance in the oral cavity may be altered by postoperative mouthrinses. Seven USP 4-0 suture materials were immersed in four commercial mouthrinses for 3, 7, 10, and 14 days in a balanced factorial design (n = 3 per condition), with artificial saliva as a time-matched reference. Maximum breaking force (Fmax), apparent wet-state mass change, and solution pH were evaluated, and Day 14 re-dried mass was determined in an additional cohort (n = 5). Fmax was significantly affected by material, mouthrinse, time, and all interaction terms (p < 0.001), with material showing the largest main effect (partial η² = 0.957). Mean Fmax decreased by 57.1% for PGA and 53.3% for PGLA between Days 3 and 14 when averaged across mouthrinses. PGLA also declined in artificial saliva (-49.1%), showing that temporal loss was not exclusive to mouthrinse exposure. Mean apparent wet-state mass change ranged from 85.1% for silk to 8.5% for nylon 66 and showed a weak pooled association with Fmax (r = -0.163, p = 0.086); suture-related pH shifts were small. Under static immersion, response was specific to the material-formulation pair and evolved with time. Continuous immersion without medium renewal or prior salivary conditioning does not reproduce intermittent clinical mouthrinse use.
SN  - 2306-5354
ER  -