Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDGland surgery

Documentation of the pyramidal lobe in pathology, operative, and imaging reports after thyroid surgery: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 10,871 patients.

  1. 1Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Abstract

The pyramidal lobe is a common anatomic structure, and residual pyramidal-lobe tissue can complicate interpretation of postoperative thyroglobulin and radioactive iodine findings and can leave a thyroidectomy anatomically incomplete. How consistently the structure is named in routine clinical reports is unknown. We aimed to quantify pyramidal-lobe documentation across pathology, operative, and imaging reports and to identify factors associated with documentation. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected records for all consecutive adults (aged ≥18 years) who underwent thyroid surgery at a single academic center between January 1, 1993, and May 31, 2025 (n=10,871), each contributing one patient-level record. Documentation was defined as an unambiguous mention of pyramidal-lobe thyroid tissue and was ascertained by electronic text search with manual confirmation of every flagged report under prespecified rules; descriptive surrogates were not accepted. Four sources were assessed: narrative pathology reports, structured pathology measurement fields, operative notes, and preoperative computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/nuclear medicine reports; the denominator for every rate is stated explicitly. Routine diagnostic thyroid ultrasound was analyzed separately (6,131 patients with an available report) and was not part of the primary outcome. Pyramidal lobes not named in the record were not assumed to be absent, and cases suggesting pyramidal-lobe disease were individually adjudicated. Multivariable logistic regression with prespecified covariates estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Mean age was 51.5 years, 77.8% were female, 51.1% underwent total thyroidectomy, 36.6% had malignant histology, and 5.3% had Graves disease. The pyramidal lobe was documented in 959 of 10,871 patients (8.8%): narrative pathology reports 884 (8.1%), structured pathology fields 193 (1.8%), operative notes 46 (0.4%), and preoperative CT/MRI/nuclear medicine reports 40 (0.4%). Sources rarely overlapped, and no patient was documented in all four. Among 6,131 routine ultrasound reports, the pyramidal lobe was named in 8 (0.13%) and never measured, whereas the isthmus was named in 58.3%. Adjudication confirmed pyramidal-lobe disease in 21 patients (0.19%; 6 carcinoma, 15 focal benign). In adjusted analysis, documentation was more likely with total thyroidectomy (OR 3.31; 95% CI: 2.77-3.96), Graves disease (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.42-2.43), and papillary (OR 3.05; 95% CI: 2.57-3.61), follicular (OR 2.61; 95% CI: 1.87-3.63), medullary (OR 3.22; 95% CI: 2.08-4.99), and poorly differentiated or high-grade carcinoma (OR 4.13; 95% CI: 1.88-9.10) relative to benign disease. Malignant histology was not associated with structured measurement documentation. In this cross-sectional analysis, pyramidal-lobe documentation was uncommon and depended on which report source was examined. These findings identify a documentation gap; they do not establish that increasing documentation changes postoperative outcomes. Standardized reporting fields, local audit, and multidisciplinary agreement on when documentation is clinically relevant are candidate interventions for prospective evaluation.

Related

  1. Improving Post‐Fall Assessment Documentation in Older Inpatients Using a Structured Falls Proforma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Ella V. Brockwell‐Mole, Dujinthan Jayabalan, Su Kitchen +1
    Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W))Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Post-polypectomy surveillance documentation and guideline concordance: A retrospective clinical audit of physician documentation at a tertiary Saudi hospital
    Muhammad F. Mubarak, MBBS, Mohammed A. Alabduljabbar, MBBS, Mohammed S. Almousa, MBBS +6
    Journal of Taibah University Medical SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyDOAJ
  3. Documentation-based fall categories, baseline functional status, and diagnosed multiregional injury after falls in older adults: A single-center retrospective study
    Takahito Hirai, Yoko Tarumi
    Journal of family medicine and primary carePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  4. Postnatal Hypertension Management and Discharge Documentation: A Retrospective Clinical Audit at a UK University Hospital.
    Ikran Mohamud, Mena Abdalla, Huma Farooq
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMC
  5. Epidural Abscess in Routine Preoperative MRI Reports Versus Documented Operative Findings, and Exploratory Mortality Risk Factors in Surgically Treated Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study
    Bahadır Balkanlı, Enver İpek, Mehmet Alp Yüksel +3
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{bettis2026documentation,
  title = {{Documentation of the pyramidal lobe in pathology, operative, and imaging reports after thyroid surgery: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 10,871 patients.}},
  author = {Tucker Bettis and Logan D Glosser and Neil Saunders and Thomas Yamashita and Quynh Tran and Loreski Collado and Anee Jackson and Collin Weber and Joe Sharma and Snehal G Patel},
  journal = {Gland surgery},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.21037/gs-2026-0397},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42996840},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Documentation of the pyramidal lobe in pathology, operative, and imaging reports after thyroid surgery: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 10,871 patients.
AU  - Tucker Bettis
AU  - Logan D Glosser
AU  - Neil Saunders
AU  - Thomas Yamashita
AU  - Quynh Tran
AU  - Loreski Collado
AU  - Anee Jackson
AU  - Collin Weber
AU  - Joe Sharma
AU  - Snehal G Patel
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Gland surgery
DO  - 10.21037/gs-2026-0397
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42996840
AB  - The pyramidal lobe is a common anatomic structure, and residual pyramidal-lobe tissue can complicate interpretation of postoperative thyroglobulin and radioactive iodine findings and can leave a thyroidectomy anatomically incomplete. How consistently the structure is named in routine clinical reports is unknown. We aimed to quantify pyramidal-lobe documentation across pathology, operative, and imaging reports and to identify factors associated with documentation. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected records for all consecutive adults (aged ≥18 years) who underwent thyroid surgery at a single academic center between January 1, 1993, and May 31, 2025 (n=10,871), each contributing one patient-level record. Documentation was defined as an unambiguous mention of pyramidal-lobe thyroid tissue and was ascertained by electronic text search with manual confirmation of every flagged report under prespecified rules; descriptive surrogates were not accepted. Four sources were assessed: narrative pathology reports, structured pathology measurement fields, operative notes, and preoperative computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/nuclear medicine reports; the denominator for every rate is stated explicitly. Routine diagnostic thyroid ultrasound was analyzed separately (6,131 patients with an available report) and was not part of the primary outcome. Pyramidal lobes not named in the record were not assumed to be absent, and cases suggesting pyramidal-lobe disease were individually adjudicated. Multivariable logistic regression with prespecified covariates estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Mean age was 51.5 years, 77.8% were female, 51.1% underwent total thyroidectomy, 36.6% had malignant histology, and 5.3% had Graves disease. The pyramidal lobe was documented in 959 of 10,871 patients (8.8%): narrative pathology reports 884 (8.1%), structured pathology fields 193 (1.8%), operative notes 46 (0.4%), and preoperative CT/MRI/nuclear medicine reports 40 (0.4%). Sources rarely overlapped, and no patient was documented in all four. Among 6,131 routine ultrasound reports, the pyramidal lobe was named in 8 (0.13%) and never measured, whereas the isthmus was named in 58.3%. Adjudication confirmed pyramidal-lobe disease in 21 patients (0.19%; 6 carcinoma, 15 focal benign). In adjusted analysis, documentation was more likely with total thyroidectomy (OR 3.31; 95% CI: 2.77-3.96), Graves disease (OR 1.86; 95% CI: 1.42-2.43), and papillary (OR 3.05; 95% CI: 2.57-3.61), follicular (OR 2.61; 95% CI: 1.87-3.63), medullary (OR 3.22; 95% CI: 2.08-4.99), and poorly differentiated or high-grade carcinoma (OR 4.13; 95% CI: 1.88-9.10) relative to benign disease. Malignant histology was not associated with structured measurement documentation. In this cross-sectional analysis, pyramidal-lobe documentation was uncommon and depended on which report source was examined. These findings identify a documentation gap; they do not establish that increasing documentation changes postoperative outcomes. Standardized reporting fields, local audit, and multidisciplinary agreement on when documentation is clinically relevant are candidate interventions for prospective evaluation.
SN  - 2227-684X
SN  - 2227-8575
ER  -