Reporting of Pericardial Adverse Events with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
- 1Harvard University
Abstract
BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events in almost any organ. While myocarditis has received the most attention, data on pericardial disease with ICI use are limited. We examined pericardial adverse event reporting with nine ICIs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
MethodsWe combined legacy AERS and current FAERS quarterly files from January 2011 to June 2026 into 18,629,240 unique cases, deduplicated by case number, and removed cases the FDA had listed as deleted. ICI exposure was identified from generic names, brand names, development code names and the active-ingredient field. Pericardial events were defined by seven MedDRA preferred terms. We estimated reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratios (PRR), Bayesian information components (IC) and empirical Bayes geometric means (EBGM). We also examined myocarditis co-reporting, time trends, a comparison with other antineoplastic agents, a MedDRA query-based outcome, and 14 alternative definitions.
ResultsThe analysis included 18,514,045 cases: 277,434 involved an ICI, 34,792 carried a pericardial term, and 1,680 had both. Pericardial events were reported disproportionately with ICIs (ROR 3.35 (95% CI 3.19 to 3.52); PRR 3.34; IC025 1.62). Eight of nine agents had a ROR above 1 (3.32 to 5.63). Among the most frequently reported terms, estimates were highest for cardiac tamponade (5.59 (95% CI 4.98 to 6.28)), followed by pericardial effusion (3.83 (95% CI 3.60 to 4.07)) and pericarditis (2.09 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.31)). After removing cases that also reported myocarditis, the ROR was 3.13 (95% CI 2.98 to 3.30). Most sensitivity analyses gave similar estimates (ROR 3.13 to 3.47); defining exposure by generic drug names alone, which identified only 44% of exposed cases, gave 3.99. Compared with cases naming other L01 antineoplastic agents, the ROR was 1.13 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.19): 1.28 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.36) for ICI-only cases and 0.96 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.04) when another antineoplastic was also named. The ICI-specific reporting odds ratio fell each quarter (odds ratio 0.977 per quarter, 95% CI 0.973 to 0.980).
ConclusionsIn FAERS, pericardial events were reported more often with ICIs than with other drugs across most agents and terms; however, incidence and causation cannot be determined. The excess over other antineoplastic agents was small, and reporting disproportionality declined over time. These findings support clinical awareness of pericardial disease in patients receiving ICIs and warrant study in data that can measure incidence.
Related
- Age-stratified signals and early onset of adverse events with pregabalin: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system
- Disproportionality analysis of adverse event reporting with aspirin, statins, and their co-exposure in FAERS, 2004–2025
- A disproportionality analysis of adverse event reports for givinostat in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database
- Infectious Complications and Toxicities of the Teclistamab Plus Daratumumab Combination in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Disproportionality and Drug–Interaction Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
- Reporting signals of selected extrapyramidal adverse events with four newer second-generation antipsychotics: a disproportionality analysis of FAERS spontaneous reports
BibTeX
@misc{balakrishna2026reporting,
title = {{Reporting of Pericardial Adverse Events with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System}},
author = {K. Balakrishna and V. Bhatt and A. Hammond and M. M. Bawoke and M. G. Fradley and D. A. Zlotoff and T. G. Neilan},
howpublished = {medRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.19.26365946},
url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.19.26365946v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Reporting of Pericardial Adverse Events with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System
AU - K. Balakrishna
AU - V. Bhatt
AU - A. Hammond
AU - M. M. Bawoke
AU - M. G. Fradley
AU - D. A. Zlotoff
AU - T. G. Neilan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
PB - medRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.19.26365946
UR - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.19.26365946v1
AB - BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events in almost any organ. While myocarditis has received the most attention, data on pericardial disease with ICI use are limited. We examined pericardial adverse event reporting with nine ICIs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). MethodsWe combined legacy AERS and current FAERS quarterly files from January 2011 to June 2026 into 18,629,240 unique cases, deduplicated by case number, and removed cases the FDA had listed as deleted. ICI exposure was identified from generic names, brand names, development code names and the active-ingredient field. Pericardial events were defined by seven MedDRA preferred terms. We estimated reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratios (PRR), Bayesian information components (IC) and empirical Bayes geometric means (EBGM). We also examined myocarditis co-reporting, time trends, a comparison with other antineoplastic agents, a MedDRA query-based outcome, and 14 alternative definitions. ResultsThe analysis included 18,514,045 cases: 277,434 involved an ICI, 34,792 carried a pericardial term, and 1,680 had both. Pericardial events were reported disproportionately with ICIs (ROR 3.35 (95% CI 3.19 to 3.52); PRR 3.34; IC025 1.62). Eight of nine agents had a ROR above 1 (3.32 to 5.63). Among the most frequently reported terms, estimates were highest for cardiac tamponade (5.59 (95% CI 4.98 to 6.28)), followed by pericardial effusion (3.83 (95% CI 3.60 to 4.07)) and pericarditis (2.09 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.31)). After removing cases that also reported myocarditis, the ROR was 3.13 (95% CI 2.98 to 3.30). Most sensitivity analyses gave similar estimates (ROR 3.13 to 3.47); defining exposure by generic drug names alone, which identified only 44% of exposed cases, gave 3.99. Compared with cases naming other L01 antineoplastic agents, the ROR was 1.13 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.19): 1.28 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.36) for ICI-only cases and 0.96 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.04) when another antineoplastic was also named. The ICI-specific reporting odds ratio fell each quarter (odds ratio 0.977 per quarter, 95% CI 0.973 to 0.980). ConclusionsIn FAERS, pericardial events were reported more often with ICIs than with other drugs across most agents and terms; however, incidence and causation cannot be determined. The excess over other antineoplastic agents was small, and reporting disproportionality declined over time. These findings support clinical awareness of pericardial disease in patients receiving ICIs and warrant study in data that can measure incidence.
ER -