Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,332 studies31 sourcesUpdated 36 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Context and exposure history shape insecticide sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster

  1. 1University of Freiburg

Abstract

Current insecticide toxicology still lacks an integrated understanding of how lethal and sublethal exposure shape organismal performance across biologically and environmentally relevant contexts. In particular, insecticide susceptibility may vary with physiological state, environmental conditions, and recent exposure history, factors that are only partially captured by standardized toxicity assessments. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster, we systematically compared responses to three insecticides with distinct modes of action - acetamiprid, chlorantraniliprole, and deltamethrin - across developmental stages, sexes, adult ages, and ambient temperatures. Insecticide sensitivity varied substantially across these conditions, with temperature modulating toxicity in a compound-dependent manner. Notably, deltamethrin caused substantial lethality at concentrations more than 10,000-fold below approved field application rates. Beyond these context-dependent differences in acute toxicity, sublethal pre-exposure to each insecticide rapidly reduced lethality during a subsequent challenge with the same compound, with increased tolerance already detectable after 24 h. Importantly, these exposure conditions that enhanced insecticide tolerance were associated with reduced resistance to environmental challenges, including heat and nutrient starvation, revealing a potential trade-off in organismal stress resilience. Acetamiprid exposure further altered reproductive performance in a concentration-dependent manner, with higher exposure reducing egg production while increasing developmental success among the resulting offspring, such that the number of offspring reaching adulthood remained largely unchanged. Together, these findings demonstrate that insecticide susceptibility is highly context dependent and can be rapidly modified by recent exposure history. We identify short-term, compound-specific, and potentially costly tolerance as an underappreciated consequence of insecticide exposure and highlight the importance of incorporating biological context, environmental conditions, and sublethal exposure history into pesticide risk assessment.

Related

  1. Time-averaged simulated microgravity ameliorates tau-induced deficit in Drosophila melanogaster
    Sung Yeon Park, Sungwoo Park, Hye-Joon Park +4
    npj MicrogravityPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysiologyDOAJ
  2. Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of two rice herbicides, cyhalofop-butyl and quinclorac, in Drosophila melanogaster
    Serap Kocaoğlu-Cenkci
    PeerJPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossref
  3. Co-administration of simvastatin mitigates clozapine-induced lifespan extension and mitochondrial functional recovery in Drosophila melanogaster.
    K. R. H. Mortimer, J. Reed, n. moisoi +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPhysiologybioRxiv
  4. Bio-Templated Zinc Oxide Nanotherapeutics from Flemingia macrophylla kuntze Ex Merr: In Vivo Anti-Diabetic and Anti-Inflammatory Efficacy in Drosophila melanogaster
    L. Khongsai, R. Sarkar, A. R. Singh +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologybioRxiv
  5. Does exposure to malaria prevention messages influence insecticide-treated net use through knowledge of malaria? Evidence from a causal mediation analysis among women in Uganda
    Edson Mwebesa, Delight Mawufemor Agbi, Charles Natuhamya +4
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{plavotic2026context,
  title = {{Context and exposure history shape insecticide sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster}},
  author = {A. Plavotic and B. Ansorge and E. Sunderbrink and A.-K. Classen},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.28.753401},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.753401v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Context and exposure history shape insecticide sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster
AU  - A. Plavotic
AU  - B. Ansorge
AU  - E. Sunderbrink
AU  - A.-K. Classen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.28.753401
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.28.753401v1
AB  - Current insecticide toxicology still lacks an integrated understanding of how lethal and sublethal exposure shape organismal performance across biologically and environmentally relevant contexts. In particular, insecticide susceptibility may vary with physiological state, environmental conditions, and recent exposure history, factors that are only partially captured by standardized toxicity assessments. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster, we systematically compared responses to three insecticides with distinct modes of action - acetamiprid, chlorantraniliprole, and deltamethrin - across developmental stages, sexes, adult ages, and ambient temperatures. Insecticide sensitivity varied substantially across these conditions, with temperature modulating toxicity in a compound-dependent manner. Notably, deltamethrin caused substantial lethality at concentrations more than 10,000-fold below approved field application rates. Beyond these context-dependent differences in acute toxicity, sublethal pre-exposure to each insecticide rapidly reduced lethality during a subsequent challenge with the same compound, with increased tolerance already detectable after 24 h. Importantly, these exposure conditions that enhanced insecticide tolerance were associated with reduced resistance to environmental challenges, including heat and nutrient starvation, revealing a potential trade-off in organismal stress resilience. Acetamiprid exposure further altered reproductive performance in a concentration-dependent manner, with higher exposure reducing egg production while increasing developmental success among the resulting offspring, such that the number of offspring reaching adulthood remained largely unchanged. Together, these findings demonstrate that insecticide susceptibility is highly context dependent and can be rapidly modified by recent exposure history. We identify short-term, compound-specific, and potentially costly tolerance as an underappreciated consequence of insecticide exposure and highlight the importance of incorporating biological context, environmental conditions, and sublethal exposure history into pesticide risk assessment.
ER  -