News reporting on arrests and trials of climate activists in the U.S., U.K., and Sweden
- 1School of the Environment, University of Toronto
- 2Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg
- 3Centre for Climate Communication and Data Science (C3DS) and Department of Geography, University of Exeter
Abstract
This paper examines how news media textually and visually represented the protests, arrests, and criminal trials of climate activists in the U.S., U.K., and Sweden during the early-2020s—a period of heightened anti-climate reactionary backlash in response to the progressive and transnational climate movement of the 2010s. This study’s cross-national, comparative, and multimodal critical discourse analysis reveals a privileging of police and prosecutors’ accounts as the primary—and oftentimes final— definers, with little room given to protesters to contest their criminalization. The analysis highlights differences between media and countries in addition to overarching patterns. Ultimately, this paper shows how major news outlets across all three countries gave primary voice to elite figures from the state’s legal apparatus to discredit protesters, but also, in the U.K. and Sweden, how these figures were occasionally qualified by scientific, political, and other experts in defense of activists—a trend strikingly absent from U.S. outlets.
Related
- Impact of climate change on the photovoltaic power potential in Sweden across 21st century
- The width beyond a static arrest point predicts which static arrests span the fault
- Comparative Reporting Patterns of Rabeprazole and Other Proton Pump Inhibitors in EudraVigilance: A System Organ Class-Level Disproportionality Analysis
- The unequal burden of biodiversity reporting
- Methodology for developing a reporting tool for the Social and Environmental Responsibility Action Plan (SER Action Plan)
BibTeX
@article{morris2026news,
title = {{News reporting on arrests and trials of climate activists in the U.S., U.K., and Sweden}},
author = {Hanna E. Morris and Kjell Vowles and Sylvia Hayes and Tristan Cann},
journal = {npj Climate Action},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s44168-026-00440-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-026-00440-9},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - News reporting on arrests and trials of climate activists in the U.S., U.K., and Sweden
AU - Hanna E. Morris
AU - Kjell Vowles
AU - Sylvia Hayes
AU - Tristan Cann
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/25
JO - npj Climate Action
DO - 10.1038/s44168-026-00440-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-026-00440-9
AB - This paper examines how news media textually and visually represented the protests, arrests, and criminal trials of climate activists in the U.S., U.K., and Sweden during the early-2020s—a period of heightened anti-climate reactionary backlash in response to the progressive and transnational climate movement of the 2010s. This study’s cross-national, comparative, and multimodal critical discourse analysis reveals a privileging of police and prosecutors’ accounts as the primary—and oftentimes final— definers, with little room given to protesters to contest their criminalization. The analysis highlights differences between media and countries in addition to overarching patterns. Ultimately, this paper shows how major news outlets across all three countries gave primary voice to elite figures from the state’s legal apparatus to discredit protesters, but also, in the U.K. and Sweden, how these figures were occasionally qualified by scientific, political, and other experts in defense of activists—a trend strikingly absent from U.S. outlets.
SN - 2731-9814
ER -