Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYReviews of Geophysics

Toward an Improved Understanding of the Antarctic Coastal Zone and Its Contribution to Future Global Sea Level

68 more authors

60 listed; 80 in total.

40 affiliations
  1. 1Norwegian Polar Institute Tromsø Norway
  2. 2Climate and Environmental Physics Physics Institute University of Bern Bern Switzerland
  3. 3Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland
  4. 4Polar Research Institute of China Shanghai China
  5. 5Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics Sgonico Italy
  6. 6Technical University of Denmark Lyngby Denmark
  7. 7National Centre for Polar and Ocean Research Vasco da Gama Goa India
  8. 8British Antarctic Survey Cambridge UK
  9. 9Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future Monash University Clayton, Kulin Nations VIC Australia
  10. 10Danish Meteorological Institute Copenhagen Denmark
  11. 11Lamont‐Doherty Earth Observatory Columbia University Palisades NY USA
  12. 12Earth and Life Institute Universite catholique de Louvain Ottignies‐Louvain‐la‐Neuve Belgium
  13. 13Water and Climate Department Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium
  14. 14Department of Geosciences University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
  15. 15Kiel University Kiel Germany
  16. 16Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven Germany
  17. 17Faculty of Geosciences University of Bremen Bremen Germany
  18. 18Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
  19. 19Amherst College Amherst MA USA
  20. 20Durham University Durham UK
  21. 21Chonnam National University Gwangju South Korea
  22. 22GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel Germany
  23. 23Polytechnic University of Marche Ancona Italy
  24. 24Swansea University Swansea UK
  25. 25University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA
  26. 26Australian Centre for Excellence in Antarctic Science The University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia
  27. 27Mineral Resources CSIRO Kensington WA Australia
  28. 28School of Earth and Oceans The University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia
  29. 29NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt MD USA
  30. 30University of Florida Gainesville FL USA
  31. 31Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Dartmouth College Hanover NH USA
  32. 32Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid Spain
  33. 33University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA
  34. 34Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling School of Geography and Natural Sciences Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
  35. 35Laboratoire de Glaciologie Université libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium
  36. 36Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Hannover Germany
  37. 37Newcastle University Newcastle‐upon‐Tyne UK
  38. 38Thayer School of Engineering Dartmouth College Hanover NH USA
  39. 39Colorado School of Mines Golden CO USA
  40. 40Department of Physical Geography Bolin Centre for Climate Research Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden

Abstract

Understanding the coastal zone of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS), where it interacts with the Southern Ocean and warmer air masses, is crucial for predicting Antarctica's influence on the global climate and sea level. This region has multiple tipping mechanisms that could trigger large, rapid, and potentially irreversible changes in the AIS, the Southern Ocean and their global connections in the coming centuries. The AIS remains the largest source of uncertainty in future sea‐level projections. Bed topography beneath the ice shelves and the coastal ice sheet is not yet well documented, and is a major source of this uncertainty. This review assesses current knowledge of the coastal zone and highlights methods to investigate it, including aerogeophysical surveys, ground‐ and ship‐based measurements, satellite observations, and computer modeling. An ensemble analysis of published bed topography data sets identifies significant data gaps and their regional distribution, framed in the context of current ice‐sheet behavior and potential instability. We propose scientific priorities and guidelines for future aerogeophysical surveys, advocating for a comprehensive, coordinated international effort to build a next‐generation data set of Antarctic bed properties. Such an initiative would significantly advance understanding of the role of coastal processes in ice‐sheet dynamics, reducing uncertainties in sea‐level rise projections and improving predictions of future ocean and climate changes.

Related

  1. A dynamical downscaling approach for the improved representation of sub-annual coastal sea level variability: the importance of shelf and slope ocean dynamics
    Jacob Steinberg, John Krasting, Andrew Ross
    Ocean SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Oceanography & cryosphereCrossref
  2. Human-induced subsidence exceeds sea-level rise in driving future coastal flood exposure in China’s Greater Bay Area
    Xudong Wang, Mi Jiang, Leonard O. Ohenhen +6
    Communications Earth & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  3. Uncertainties in recent tropical stratospheric and tropospheric ozone changes restrict our understanding of future total column ozone change
    Sean M. Davis, William T. Ball, Yue Jia +40
    Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedTheoretical & computational chemistryClimate scienceHALCrossref
  4. On the Role of the Antarctic Slope Front on the Occurrence of the Weddell Sea Polynya under Climate Change
    Joseph Lockwood, Carolina Dufour, Stephen Griffies +1
    Journal of ClimatePeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text39 citedOceanography & cryosphereHAL
  5. Bayesian Retrieval of L-Band Absorption by Ice using SMOS Brightness Temperatures over the Antarctic Plateau
    Hippolyte Signargout, Ghislain Picard, Olivier Zahm +5
    HALPreprintLicence Ouverte 2.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionComputational physicsHAL
BibTeX
@article{matsuoka2026toward,
  title = {{Toward an Improved Understanding of the Antarctic Coastal Zone and Its Contribution to Future Global Sea Level}},
  author = {Kenichi Matsuoka and Geir Moholdt and Jennifer F. Arthur and Julien A. Bodart and Xiangbin Cui and Fausto Ferraccioli and Rene Forsberg and Vikram Goel and Tom A. Jordan and Felicity S. McCormack and Ruth H. Mottram and Hamish D. Pritchard and Calvin S. Shackleton and K. J. Tinto and Fredrik Boberg and Marie G. P. Cavitte and Reinhard Drews and Pierre Dutrieux and J.H.J Ebbing and Olaf Eisen and Hannes Eisermann and Alex Gardner and Chad A. Greene and Nicholas Holschuh and Stewart S. R. Jamieson and Byeong‐Hoon Kim and Naomi Krauzig and Bernd Kulessa and C. Leuschen and Jilu Li and Lu Li and Jonas Liebsch and Joseph A. MacGregor and Emma Johanne MacKie and Anirudha Vijay Mahagaonkar and Joséphine Maton and Mathieu Morlighem and Francisco Navarro and Peter D. Neff and Inès Otosaka and Frank Pattyn and Antonia Stefanie Ruppel and Rebecca J. Sanderson and Helene L. Seroussi and Andrew P. Shepherd and Matthew R. Siegfried and Thomas Slater and Arjen Peter Stroeven and M. Studinger and Thomas O. Teisberg and Ryan A. Venturelli and Jeremy Paul Winberry and Chen Zhao and Lu An and Jonathan Louis Bamber and Robin E. Bell and Robert G. Bingham and Johanna Brehmer-Moltmann and Graeme Eagles and Jamin S. Greenbaum},
  journal = {Reviews of Geophysics},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1029/2022rg000803},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1029/2022rg000803},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Toward an Improved Understanding of the Antarctic Coastal Zone and Its Contribution to Future Global Sea Level
AU  - Kenichi Matsuoka
AU  - Geir Moholdt
AU  - Jennifer F. Arthur
AU  - Julien A. Bodart
AU  - Xiangbin Cui
AU  - Fausto Ferraccioli
AU  - Rene Forsberg
AU  - Vikram Goel
AU  - Tom A. Jordan
AU  - Felicity S. McCormack
AU  - Ruth H. Mottram
AU  - Hamish D. Pritchard
AU  - Calvin S. Shackleton
AU  - K. J. Tinto
AU  - Fredrik Boberg
AU  - Marie G. P. Cavitte
AU  - Reinhard Drews
AU  - Pierre Dutrieux
AU  - J.H.J Ebbing
AU  - Olaf Eisen
AU  - Hannes Eisermann
AU  - Alex Gardner
AU  - Chad A. Greene
AU  - Nicholas Holschuh
AU  - Stewart S. R. Jamieson
AU  - Byeong‐Hoon Kim
AU  - Naomi Krauzig
AU  - Bernd Kulessa
AU  - C. Leuschen
AU  - Jilu Li
AU  - Lu Li
AU  - Jonas Liebsch
AU  - Joseph A. MacGregor
AU  - Emma Johanne MacKie
AU  - Anirudha Vijay Mahagaonkar
AU  - Joséphine Maton
AU  - Mathieu Morlighem
AU  - Francisco Navarro
AU  - Peter D. Neff
AU  - Inès Otosaka
AU  - Frank Pattyn
AU  - Antonia Stefanie Ruppel
AU  - Rebecca J. Sanderson
AU  - Helene L. Seroussi
AU  - Andrew P. Shepherd
AU  - Matthew R. Siegfried
AU  - Thomas Slater
AU  - Arjen Peter Stroeven
AU  - M. Studinger
AU  - Thomas O. Teisberg
AU  - Ryan A. Venturelli
AU  - Jeremy Paul Winberry
AU  - Chen Zhao
AU  - Lu An
AU  - Jonathan Louis Bamber
AU  - Robin E. Bell
AU  - Robert G. Bingham
AU  - Johanna Brehmer-Moltmann
AU  - Graeme Eagles
AU  - Jamin S. Greenbaum
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - Reviews of Geophysics
DO  - 10.1029/2022rg000803
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1029/2022rg000803
AB  - Understanding the coastal zone of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS), where it interacts with the Southern Ocean and warmer air masses, is crucial for predicting Antarctica's influence on the global climate and sea level. This region has multiple tipping mechanisms that could trigger large, rapid, and potentially irreversible changes in the AIS, the Southern Ocean and their global connections in the coming centuries. The AIS remains the largest source of uncertainty in future sea‐level projections. Bed topography beneath the ice shelves and the coastal ice sheet is not yet well documented, and is a major source of this uncertainty. This review assesses current knowledge of the coastal zone and highlights methods to investigate it, including aerogeophysical surveys, ground‐ and ship‐based measurements, satellite observations, and computer modeling. An ensemble analysis of published bed topography data sets identifies significant data gaps and their regional distribution, framed in the context of current ice‐sheet behavior and potential instability. We propose scientific priorities and guidelines for future aerogeophysical surveys, advocating for a comprehensive, coordinated international effort to build a next‐generation data set of Antarctic bed properties. Such an initiative would significantly advance understanding of the role of coastal processes in ice‐sheet dynamics, reducing uncertainties in sea‐level rise projections and improving predictions of future ocean and climate changes.
SN  - 0096-1043
SN  - 1944-9208
SN  - 8755-1209
ER  -