Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of evaluation in clinical practice

Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Measurement Instrument for Functioning and Function-Affecting Factors in Women With Breast Cancer: A Rasch Analysis Approach.

12 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
  2. 2School of Physical Therapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario. Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada, Department of Occupational therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  3. 3Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  4. 4Department of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  5. 5Department of Hematology Oncology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  6. 6Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  7. 7Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  8. 8Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  9. 9Department of Hematology and Oncology, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  10. 10Health Promotion Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  11. 11Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  12. 12Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Istinye University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Abstract

Purpose

To develop and psychometrically evaluate an instrument for assessing functioning and function-affecting factors in women with breast cancer, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for Breast Cancer.Methods

This methodological study combined a systematic literature review, qualitative interviews with women with breast cancer, and expert consultation to develop the questionnaire. Face validity was assessed in 10 women with breast cancer, content validity by 10 experts, and structural validity and reliability in 305 women with breast cancer. Rasch analysis was performed using dichotomized item responses, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted in R using the WLSMV estimator for ordered categorical variables. Internal consistency was evaluated using McDonald's Omega.Results

Following content validation, the preliminary questionnaire contained 70 items (40 functioning and 30 function-affecting factors). Rasch analysis identified misfitting items and resulted in a final 55-item instrument comprising 32 functioning items and 23 function-affecting items. CFA supported the proposed multidimensional structure after theoretically justified model refinement. The functioning section demonstrated satisfactory model fit (CFI = 0.976, TLI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.040, 90% CI = 0.034-0.046), while the function-affecting factors section also demonstrated acceptable fit (CFI = 0.979, TLI = 0.977, RMSEA = 0.054, 90% CI = 0.046-0.062). Although several items showed relatively low standardized factor loadings, they were retained because of acceptable Rasch fit, satisfactory content validity, and conceptual importance. McDonald's Omega indicated acceptable internal consistency across the retained subscales.Conclusion

The findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the reliability and structural validity of this ICF-based instrument for assessing functioning and function-affecting factors in women with breast cancer. Further validation in independent populations is recommended before broader clinical implementation.

Related

  1. The Master Adaptive Learner Behavioral Assessment Scale (MAL BAS): Development, Validity Evidence, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a New Instrument
    Wing Fu, Tricia R. Prokop, Rosa Elena Torres-Panchamé
    Medical Science EducatorPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  2. Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a modified Chinese instrument for self-rated mastery of diabetes exercise knowledge (DEKS-C)
    Lei Mei, Hongying Pan, Kaiyan Zhu +6
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  3. Psychometric properties and longitudinal measurement invariance of the Functional Assessment of Cancer-Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale in the Chinese colorectal cancer chemotherapy population.
    Qingchun Geng, Yang Li, Hongwen Ma +3
    Journal of patient-reported outcomesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
  4. Development and psychometric validation of the Sexual Health Literacy Measurement Tool for Undergraduate Students (SHL-US) in Thailand
    Natnapa Heebkaew Padchasuwan, Jintapa Benchamas, Pokkamol Laoraksawong +3
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsInfectious diseasePLOS
  5. Development and psychometric evaluation of a pre-sarcopenia risk assessment scale for sedentary young adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Chen-Xia Zhang, Cong-Cong Jin, Shi-Wei Liu +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{jamshidihosseinabadi2026development,
  title = {{Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Measurement Instrument for Functioning and Function-Affecting Factors in Women With Breast Cancer: A Rasch Analysis Approach.}},
  author = {Farkhondeh Jamshidihosseinabadi and Maryam Farzad and Enayatollah Bakhshi and Seyed Ali Hosseini and Amir Hossein Emami and Kamran Roudini and Mehrzad Mirzania and Farhad Shahi and Mohsen Esfandbod and Mojtaba Habibi Asgarabad},
  journal = {Journal of evaluation in clinical practice},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1111/jep.70705},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42950126},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Measurement Instrument for Functioning and Function-Affecting Factors in Women With Breast Cancer: A Rasch Analysis Approach.
AU  - Farkhondeh Jamshidihosseinabadi
AU  - Maryam Farzad
AU  - Enayatollah Bakhshi
AU  - Seyed Ali Hosseini
AU  - Amir Hossein Emami
AU  - Kamran Roudini
AU  - Mehrzad Mirzania
AU  - Farhad Shahi
AU  - Mohsen Esfandbod
AU  - Mojtaba Habibi Asgarabad
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
DO  - 10.1111/jep.70705
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42950126
AB  - Purpose  To develop and psychometrically evaluate an instrument for assessing functioning and function-affecting factors in women with breast cancer, based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for Breast Cancer.Methods  This methodological study combined a systematic literature review, qualitative interviews with women with breast cancer, and expert consultation to develop the questionnaire. Face validity was assessed in 10 women with breast cancer, content validity by 10 experts, and structural validity and reliability in 305 women with breast cancer. Rasch analysis was performed using dichotomized item responses, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted in R using the WLSMV estimator for ordered categorical variables. Internal consistency was evaluated using McDonald's Omega.Results  Following content validation, the preliminary questionnaire contained 70 items (40 functioning and 30 function-affecting factors). Rasch analysis identified misfitting items and resulted in a final 55-item instrument comprising 32 functioning items and 23 function-affecting items. CFA supported the proposed multidimensional structure after theoretically justified model refinement. The functioning section demonstrated satisfactory model fit (CFI = 0.976, TLI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.040, 90% CI = 0.034-0.046), while the function-affecting factors section also demonstrated acceptable fit (CFI = 0.979, TLI = 0.977, RMSEA = 0.054, 90% CI = 0.046-0.062). Although several items showed relatively low standardized factor loadings, they were retained because of acceptable Rasch fit, satisfactory content validity, and conceptual importance. McDonald's Omega indicated acceptable internal consistency across the retained subscales.Conclusion  The findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the reliability and structural validity of this ICF-based instrument for assessing functioning and function-affecting factors in women with breast cancer. Further validation in independent populations is recommended before broader clinical implementation.
SN  - 1356-1294
SN  - 1365-2753
ER  -