Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

Food Environment, Food Access, and Disparities in Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Evidence Gaps and Future Directions

4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  2. 2Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
  3. 3Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
  4. 4Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer has among the poorest survival of any malignancy, with substantial disparities in outcomes. Nutritional status is associated with treatment tolerance, postoperative complications, and survival in pancreatic cancer, while dietary factors have also been associated with pancreatic cancer risk. The food environment, including access to and the relative availability of healthy and unhealthy food retailers, represents a potentially modifiable structural determinant of health. In this narrative review, we summarize evidence on nutrition and pancreatic cancer and on food environment and cancer outcomes. Few studies have examined food environment in pancreatic cancer, and findings are inconsistent. A large U.S. study using a composite food environment measure found associations with later-stage presentation and modestly worse survival, and a county-level analysis reported higher pancreatic cancer mortality in food swamps. Studies examining food desert residence, however, have not demonstrated associations with pancreatic cancer incidence or survival. Multi-cancer studies, including pancreatic cancer, report associations between poor food environments and cancer outcomes but generally do not report pancreas-specific results. Current evidence linking food environment to pancreatic cancer outcomes is limited and extrapolated from other cancers and chronic conditions, comes entirely from the United States, and relies on area-level exposure measures. We describe community interventions to improve food access, none yet evaluated for cancer outcomes, and propose a research agenda to address these gaps.

Related

  1. Reaching for the Exposome: Recent Advances and Future Directions for Understanding Environment-Brain-Cognition Links.
    Brittany K Taylor
    Biological psychiatry global open sciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  2. Current Status and Future Directions of Cardiovascular Intensive Care in Japan: Workforce, Structure, Education, and Regional Disparities ― Report of the Japan Critical Care Cardiology Committee (J4CS) ―
    Jun Nakata, Shoji Kawakami, Toru Kondo +9
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  3. Treatment Strategies and Future Directions for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Kevin M. Turner, Jason B. Gurewitz, Jessica M. Frakes +5
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0OncologyCrossref
  4. Molecular, Cytogenetic, and Immunophenotypic Biomarkers in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Evidence and Future Directions—A Narrative Review
    Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu
    Health science reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Scabies Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic Methods, Clinical Misdiagnosis, and Emerging Directions
    Saptorshi Gupta, Simon Thornley, Cameron Grant +2
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{liu2026food,
  title = {{Food Environment, Food Access, and Disparities in Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Evidence Gaps and Future Directions}},
  author = {Christopher Liu and Charlotte Burch and Vashti Bandy and Anna Gibson and Vignesh Vudatha and Devon Freudenberger and Jacob Lambdin and Kelly Herremans and Andrea Riner and Leopoldo Fernandez and Jose Trevino},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18213635},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3635},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Food Environment, Food Access, and Disparities in Pancreatic Cancer Outcomes: A Narrative Review of Evidence Gaps and Future Directions
AU  - Christopher Liu
AU  - Charlotte Burch
AU  - Vashti Bandy
AU  - Anna Gibson
AU  - Vignesh Vudatha
AU  - Devon Freudenberger
AU  - Jacob Lambdin
AU  - Kelly Herremans
AU  - Andrea Riner
AU  - Leopoldo Fernandez
AU  - Jose Trevino
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/31
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18213635
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3635
AB  - Pancreatic cancer has among the poorest survival of any malignancy, with substantial disparities in outcomes. Nutritional status is associated with treatment tolerance, postoperative complications, and survival in pancreatic cancer, while dietary factors have also been associated with pancreatic cancer risk. The food environment, including access to and the relative availability of healthy and unhealthy food retailers, represents a potentially modifiable structural determinant of health. In this narrative review, we summarize evidence on nutrition and pancreatic cancer and on food environment and cancer outcomes. Few studies have examined food environment in pancreatic cancer, and findings are inconsistent. A large U.S. study using a composite food environment measure found associations with later-stage presentation and modestly worse survival, and a county-level analysis reported higher pancreatic cancer mortality in food swamps. Studies examining food desert residence, however, have not demonstrated associations with pancreatic cancer incidence or survival. Multi-cancer studies, including pancreatic cancer, report associations between poor food environments and cancer outcomes but generally do not report pancreas-specific results. Current evidence linking food environment to pancreatic cancer outcomes is limited and extrapolated from other cancers and chronic conditions, comes entirely from the United States, and relies on area-level exposure measures. We describe community interventions to improve food access, none yet evaluated for cancer outcomes, and propose a research agenda to address these gaps.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -