Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,546 studies31 sourcesUpdated 40 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Effectiveness of digital health education interventions for chronic disease self-management in community-dwelling older adults: an umbrella review and evidence classification

  1. 1Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

Background: Digital health education interventions are widely promoted to support chronic disease self-management. However, existing umbrella reviews pool evidence across all ages and have not assessed community-dwelling older adults, who face barriers to digital access. This umbrella review aimed to determine whether current evidence supports the effectiveness of digital health education interventions for chronic disease self-management in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older.

Methods: We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews evaluating digital health education interventions for chronic disease self-management in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older. Six databases were searched for systematic reviews published between 2015 and 2026. Meta-analytic outcomes were re-estimated using random-effects models, evidence was graded according to the Ioannidis criteria, methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2, and primary-study overlap was quantified using the corrected covered area (CCA).

Results: Of the 1,272 records identified, 11 met the eligibility criteria, and 10 contributed 44 meta-analytic outcomes derived from 199 primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across five chronic disease clusters. The evidence base showed minimal overlap among primary studies (overall CCA was 0.76%). None of the outcomes met the criteria for convincing (Class I), highly suggestive (Class II), or suggestive (Class III) evidence. Fifteen outcomes (34.1%) were classified as weak (Class IV), whereas 29 (65.9%) were non-significant. According to AMSTAR 2, only three of the 10 systematic reviews were rated as high confidence, whereas two were rated as low and five as critically low confidence; the 95% prediction interval crossed the null for all 44 outcomes.

Conclusion: When the evidence is limited to community-dwelling older adults, no digital health education intervention for chronic disease self-management is supported by high-credibility evidence at the umbrella review level. This finding most likely reflects the immaturity of the current evidence base—characterized by a limited number of trials, short follow-up periods, and substantial heterogeneity—rather than a lack of intervention effectiveness. Well-powered RCTs with longer follow-up and higher-quality systematic reviews specifically focused on older adults are needed to strengthen the evidence base.

Related

  1. Effectiveness of green health prescribing and nature-based interventions in primary care and community settings for older adults: a systematic review of health, wellbeing and social outcomes
    Furqan Butt, Jeremiah Donoghue, Cameron Ley +10
    BMC MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  2. Comparative effectiveness of exercise and self-management interventions delivered through different modes of digital support on pain and patient-reported physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Hao Luo, Guoqing Zhang, Lingyun Long +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Effectiveness of eHealth lifestyle interventions on management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yangguo Zhao, Xinrui Yang, Yang Bai +2
    Nutrition & diabetesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on stress and anxiety management in pregnancy: a systematic review
    Julianne Sautier, Cyril Tarquinio, Thierry Cardoso +1
    MidwiferyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyPsychiatry & mental healthHAL
  5. Evaluating the effectiveness of a hybrid diabetes education program: a secondary analysis of healthy community clinic records in Jordan.
    Duaa Al-Maghaireh, Saif Fakhoury, Mariam Kawafha +7
    BMC medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCDOAJPMC
BibTeX
@article{sezer2026effectiveness,
  title = {{Effectiveness of digital health education interventions for chronic disease self-management in community-dwelling older adults: an umbrella review and evidence classification}},
  author = {Esra Sezer and Gözde Gür},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1948010},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1948010},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Effectiveness of digital health education interventions for chronic disease self-management in community-dwelling older adults: an umbrella review and evidence classification
AU  - Esra Sezer
AU  - Gözde Gür
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1948010
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1948010
AB  - Background: Digital health education interventions are widely promoted to support chronic disease self-management. However, existing umbrella reviews pool evidence across all ages and have not assessed community-dwelling older adults, who face barriers to digital access. This umbrella review aimed to determine whether current evidence supports the effectiveness of digital health education interventions for chronic disease self-management in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older.  Methods: We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews evaluating digital health education interventions for chronic disease self-management in community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older. Six databases were searched for systematic reviews published between 2015 and 2026. Meta-analytic outcomes were re-estimated using random-effects models, evidence was graded according to the Ioannidis criteria, methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2, and primary-study overlap was quantified using the corrected covered area (CCA).  Results: Of the 1,272 records identified, 11 met the eligibility criteria, and 10 contributed 44 meta-analytic outcomes derived from 199 primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across five chronic disease clusters. The evidence base showed minimal overlap among primary studies (overall CCA was 0.76%). None of the outcomes met the criteria for convincing (Class I), highly suggestive (Class II), or suggestive (Class III) evidence. Fifteen outcomes (34.1%) were classified as weak (Class IV), whereas 29 (65.9%) were non-significant. According to AMSTAR 2, only three of the 10 systematic reviews were rated as high confidence, whereas two were rated as low and five as critically low confidence; the 95% prediction interval crossed the null for all 44 outcomes.  Conclusion: When the evidence is limited to community-dwelling older adults, no digital health education intervention for chronic disease self-management is supported by high-credibility evidence at the umbrella review level. This finding most likely reflects the immaturity of the current evidence base—characterized by a limited number of trials, short follow-up periods, and substantial heterogeneity—rather than a lack of intervention effectiveness. Well-powered RCTs with longer follow-up and higher-quality systematic reviews specifically focused on older adults are needed to strengthen the evidence base.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -