Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 6 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDbioRxiv

Insulators As Dynamic, Tunable Regulators of Enhancer-Promoter Coordination in Living Drosophila Embryos

  1. 1University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

The three-dimensional organization of the genome enables enhancers and promoters to interact across vast distances and direct transcription. Yet whether architectural elements, such as insulators, serve as rigid, passive barriers or as dynamic, active organizers of this communication remains unclear. Here, using single-cell, live imaging of a Drosophila transgene in which a single enhancer regulates two equidistant promoters, we confirm that the enhancer engages both promoters simultaneously and show that coordinated bursting is intrinsically more productive than uncoordinated activity. Flanking this system with insulators increases coordinated bursting frequency and transcriptional output, indicating that insulator-mediated looping promotes multi-way enhancer-promoter interaction. Further, bidirectionally-paired, homotypic insulators produce stronger coordination than unidirectional pairs. Inserting an intermediate insulator to generate competing loop configurations, together with two-state promoter modeling, we show that these chromatin loops are highly dynamic. This work reframes insulators as active, tunable regulators that shape the frequency, coordination, and productivity of enhancer-promoter communication.

Related

  1. Enhancer-promoter proximity predicts transcriptional competence but not transcriptional output in the Drosophila brain
    Olivier Messina, Loucif Remini, Christopher H. Bohrer +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textBiophysicsGenetics & genomicsarXiv
  2. Dynamic merging of enhancer- and promoter-associated assemblies is coupled to transcriptional bursting
    Q. Lin, B. Wang, Y. Liu +9
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  3. Epigenetic Rewiring of Enhancer–Promoter Interactions in Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications
    Lavanya Choppavarapu, Bakhtiyor Nosirov, Michael Kahn +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  4. Recurrent enhancer-promoter interactions across samples
    Matthew Weston, Satvik Gunjala, Haiyan Hu +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationBioinformatics & computational biologyPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  5. Enhancer control of promoter activity and variability via frequency modulation of clustered transcriptional bursts
    Jana Tünnermann, Grégory Roth, Julie Cramard +1
    Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text10 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
BibTeX
@misc{buitrago2026insulators,
  title = {{Insulators As Dynamic, Tunable Regulators of Enhancer-Promoter Coordination in Living Drosophila Embryos}},
  author = {N. Buitrago and C. Nieto and A. Singh and B. Lim},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.09.750400},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.09.750400v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Insulators As Dynamic, Tunable Regulators of Enhancer-Promoter Coordination in Living Drosophila Embryos
AU  - N. Buitrago
AU  - C. Nieto
AU  - A. Singh
AU  - B. Lim
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.09.750400
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.09.750400v1
AB  - The three-dimensional organization of the genome enables enhancers and promoters to interact across vast distances and direct transcription. Yet whether architectural elements, such as insulators, serve as rigid, passive barriers or as dynamic, active organizers of this communication remains unclear. Here, using single-cell, live imaging of a Drosophila transgene in which a single enhancer regulates two equidistant promoters, we confirm that the enhancer engages both promoters simultaneously and show that coordinated bursting is intrinsically more productive than uncoordinated activity. Flanking this system with insulators increases coordinated bursting frequency and transcriptional output, indicating that insulator-mediated looping promotes multi-way enhancer-promoter interaction. Further, bidirectionally-paired, homotypic insulators produce stronger coordination than unidirectional pairs. Inserting an intermediate insulator to generate competing loop configurations, together with two-state promoter modeling, we show that these chromatin loops are highly dynamic. This work reframes insulators as active, tunable regulators that shape the frequency, coordination, and productivity of enhancer-promoter communication.
ER  -