Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPLOS One

Recurrent enhancer-promoter interactions across samples

  1. 1Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States of America.
  2. 2Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States of America.

Abstract

Enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) are fundamental to gene regulation, and clarifying their recurrence across diverse biological contexts is key to understanding chromatin architecture. Here, we systematically evaluate EPI recurrence using 95 HiChIP and 266 Hi-C datasets spanning multiple cell types, cell lines, and experimental conditions. We find that each of the majority of EPIs identified in any given sample is also observed in other samples, largely independent of assay type, cellular context, or enhancer annotation strategy. EPIs unique to an individual sample tend to occur in regions with fewer neighboring EPIs or in a sample with greater sequencing depth, indicating that many such “unique” EPIs likely reflect low sequencing depth rather than true biological specificity. Collectively, our results suggest that most human EPIs may have already been cataloged, and that gene regulation primarily relies on the selective reuse of a shared pool of EPIs across contexts. Thus, while EPIs are context-specific in pairwise sample comparisons, they are broadly recurrent when considered across a large compendium of samples. These findings underscore the pervasive and reusable nature of EPIs and have important implications for the interpretation of chromatin conformation data.

Related

  1. Epigenetic Rewiring of Enhancer–Promoter Interactions in Cancer: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications
    Lavanya Choppavarapu, Bakhtiyor Nosirov, Michael Kahn +1
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  2. Dynamic merging of enhancer- and promoter-associated assemblies is coupled to transcriptional bursting
    Q. Lin, B. Wang, Y. Liu +9
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  3. Enhancer-promoter proximity predicts transcriptional competence but not transcriptional output in the Drosophila brain
    Olivier Messina, Loucif Remini, Christopher H. Bohrer +4
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textBiophysicsGenetics & genomicsarXiv
  4. Insulators As Dynamic, Tunable Regulators of Enhancer-Promoter Coordination in Living Drosophila Embryos
    N. Buitrago, C. Nieto, A. Singh +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationbioRxiv
  5. Enhancer control of promoter activity and variability via frequency modulation of clustered transcriptional bursts
    Jana Tünnermann, Grégory Roth, Julie Cramard +1
    Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text10 citedMolecular biology & gene regulationOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{weston2026recurrent,
  title = {{Recurrent enhancer-promoter interactions across samples}},
  author = {Matthew Weston and Satvik Gunjala and Haiyan Hu and Xiaoman Li},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360620},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360620},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Recurrent enhancer-promoter interactions across samples
AU  - Matthew Weston
AU  - Satvik Gunjala
AU  - Haiyan Hu
AU  - Xiaoman Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360620
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360620
AB  - Enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) are fundamental to gene regulation, and clarifying their recurrence across diverse biological contexts is key to understanding chromatin architecture. Here, we systematically evaluate EPI recurrence using 95 HiChIP and 266 Hi-C datasets spanning multiple cell types, cell lines, and experimental conditions. We find that each of the majority of EPIs identified in any given sample is also observed in other samples, largely independent of assay type, cellular context, or enhancer annotation strategy. EPIs unique to an individual sample tend to occur in regions with fewer neighboring EPIs or in a sample with greater sequencing depth, indicating that many such “unique” EPIs likely reflect low sequencing depth rather than true biological specificity. Collectively, our results suggest that most human EPIs may have already been cataloged, and that gene regulation primarily relies on the selective reuse of a shared pool of EPIs across contexts. Thus, while EPIs are context-specific in pairwise sample comparisons, they are broadly recurrent when considered across a large compendium of samples. These findings underscore the pervasive and reusable nature of EPIs and have important implications for the interpretation of chromatin conformation data.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -