Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of food science

Edible Rose and Roselle: A Critical Review of Nutritional Composition, Safety, and Regulatory Considerations for Product Development.

  1. 1Department of Crop Science, Division of Quality and Sensory of Plant Products, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable and health-promoting products has increased scientific and industrial interest in edible flowers as functional ingredients. Rose (Rosa spp.) and roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) have gained attention for their traditional use, diverse phytochemical composition, and emerging applications in functional foods, nutraceuticals, and cosmetics. Much existing literature treats these species descriptively, reporting compositional data without critically addressing the safety, regulatory, and standardization barriers constraining industrial adoption. This review evaluates their nutritional composition, phytochemical profiles, and techno-functional properties, while critically addressing cultivar-level compositional variability, food safety (natural toxic compounds, microbial risk, pesticide residues), allergenicity, extraction methodology standardization, regional regulatory frameworks, and post-harvest industrial standardization. Rose petals are characterized by volatile terpenoids, flavonol glycosides, and phenolic acids linked to sensory quality and antioxidant activity; documented safety concerns centre on pesticide residue risk from dual ornamental/food-crop cultivation and oil adulteration. Roselle calyces are rich in anthocyanins, organic acids, polysaccharides, and minerals, supporting use as natural colorants, acidulants, and stabilizers, though cyanogenic glycoside variability, microbiological surveillance gaps, and an almost complete absence of allergenicity data warrant attention. Roselle seed protein, proposed as a functional ingredient, lacks allergenicity characterization. Applications in beverages, bakery products, gels, and cosmetics demonstrate commercial potential, but broader adoption remains limited by compositional variability, bioactive instability, and a persistent gap between demonstrated technical feasibility and adopted, food-relevant standards for extraction, quality control, and regulatory harmonization. Future research should prioritize dose-specific toxicological and allergenicity data, validated extraction protocols, and deliberate prioritization of edible flowers within regulatory and standardization mechanisms.

Related

  1. Dietary and Nutritional Considerations for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Psoriasis and Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Narrative Review
    Woo Chiao Tay, Choon Fong Liew, Yu Jun Wong +2
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  2. WHO Target Product Profiles for Dengue Therapeutics: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Ethical, Regulatory, and Implementation Considerations
    Tess Johnson, Shanghavie Loganathan, Euzebiusz Jamrozik +2
    The Lancet. MicrobePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedEpidemiology & public healthPMC
  3. Immunomodulatory strategies for ex vivo immune cell expansion in adoptive cell therapy: translational and regulatory considerations for clinical manufacturing
    Weng Wan Chan, Estella Zhi Yu Lim, Deepak Choudhury
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  4. Lycium ruthenicum as a Functional Food Resource: Chemical Composition, Nutritional Value, Health Benefits, and Biological Activities
    Yujin Liu, Ziqi Meng, Sihan Liu +9
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  5. Toward Long-Acting Injectable Antidepressants: Drug-Delivery Strategies, Clinical Considerations, and Regulatory Barriers.
    Haripriya Koppisetti, Weranga Rajapaksha, Harsh P Nijhawan +3
    PharmaceuticsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{dada2026edible,
  title = {{Edible Rose and Roselle: A Critical Review of Nutritional Composition, Safety, and Regulatory Considerations for Product Development.}},
  author = {Temilola Dada and Susanne Neugart and Layla Engelhardt},
  journal = {Journal of food science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1111/1750-3841.71524},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42895182},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Edible Rose and Roselle: A Critical Review of Nutritional Composition, Safety, and Regulatory Considerations for Product Development.
AU  - Temilola Dada
AU  - Susanne Neugart
AU  - Layla Engelhardt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of food science
DO  - 10.1111/1750-3841.71524
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42895182
AB  - The growing demand for sustainable and health-promoting products has increased scientific and industrial interest in edible flowers as functional ingredients. Rose (Rosa spp.) and roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) have gained attention for their traditional use, diverse phytochemical composition, and emerging applications in functional foods, nutraceuticals, and cosmetics. Much existing literature treats these species descriptively, reporting compositional data without critically addressing the safety, regulatory, and standardization barriers constraining industrial adoption. This review evaluates their nutritional composition, phytochemical profiles, and techno-functional properties, while critically addressing cultivar-level compositional variability, food safety (natural toxic compounds, microbial risk, pesticide residues), allergenicity, extraction methodology standardization, regional regulatory frameworks, and post-harvest industrial standardization. Rose petals are characterized by volatile terpenoids, flavonol glycosides, and phenolic acids linked to sensory quality and antioxidant activity; documented safety concerns centre on pesticide residue risk from dual ornamental/food-crop cultivation and oil adulteration. Roselle calyces are rich in anthocyanins, organic acids, polysaccharides, and minerals, supporting use as natural colorants, acidulants, and stabilizers, though cyanogenic glycoside variability, microbiological surveillance gaps, and an almost complete absence of allergenicity data warrant attention. Roselle seed protein, proposed as a functional ingredient, lacks allergenicity characterization. Applications in beverages, bakery products, gels, and cosmetics demonstrate commercial potential, but broader adoption remains limited by compositional variability, bioactive instability, and a persistent gap between demonstrated technical feasibility and adopted, food-relevant standards for extraction, quality control, and regulatory harmonization. Future research should prioritize dose-specific toxicological and allergenicity data, validated extraction protocols, and deliberate prioritization of edible flowers within regulatory and standardization mechanisms.
SN  - 1750-3841
ER  -