Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0EarthArXiv

A Unified Forearc Subsidence Model Based on the Three-Arc Unjoined Structure of the Honshu Arc

Abstract

This study reinterprets the subsidence, uplift, fault activity, and geomorphic development observed in the Nōbi Plain, Ise Bay, Lake Biwa, Wakasa Bay, and Osaka Bay through a new structural framework in which the Honshu Arc is understood as an incompletely joined system of three arcs. The Southwest Japan Arc (narrow sense), the Hida–Tamba Terrane, and the Northeast Japan Arc approached each other during the opening of the Japan Sea but never fully sutured. Their unjoined boundaries are exposed on the forearc side, forming Forearc Weak Suture Zones, where the weakness of accretionary complexes and the overlap of major fault zones concentrate subsidence, seismic shaking, and geomorphic reorganization. The Nōbi Plain lies within a Dual Weak Surface Structure, defined by the Yōrō Fault (inner weak surface) and the Biwa Western Margin–Rokko Fault Zone (outer weak surface), and is therefore interpreted not as a depositional basin but as a subsidence-dominated forearc basin. Ise Bay represents its southern continuation, forming a single forearc subsidence system. Lake Biwa occupies the northwestern end of the unjoined arc structure, while uplift along the Wakasa Bay coast is explained by three-sided tectonic confinement imposed by rigid crustal blocks. The continuous subsidence belt from Lake Biwa through the former Ogura Lake and Funo Basin to Osaka Bay defines the Kinki Subsidence Line, a western counterpart to the South Fossa Magna, effectively a “Second Fossa Magna.” This study demonstrates that the South Fossa Magna–Kanto Basin system and the Nōbi–Biwa–Osaka system are governed by the same forearc weak suture zone processes, thereby establishing a unified tectonic model for forearc subsidence in the Japanese Islands.

Related

  1. Characterizing the Forearc Basement and Subducting Structures of the Northern Ecuadorian Margin
    Arnaud Delsuc, Audrey Galvé, Mireille Laigle +8
    Journal of Geophysical Research : Solid EarthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyHAL
  2. Order, Structure and Reality: A Unified Hierarchical Framework
    Masoud Akbarpour
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral earth scienceAlgebra & number theoryHAL
  3. Subsidence more than doubles sea-level rise today along densely populated coasts
    Julius Oelsmann, Robert James Nicholls, Daniël Lincke +8
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text7 citedGeology & geochemistryOpenAlex
  4. Human-induced subsidence exceeds sea-level rise in driving future coastal flood exposure in China’s Greater Bay Area
    Xudong Wang, Mi Jiang, Leonard O. Ohenhen +6
    Communications Earth & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
  5. Impacts of mesoscale atmospheric subsidence on cloud glaciation and decoupling in Arctic marine cold air outbreaks
    Fiona Paulus, Joshua J. Müller, Benjamin Kirbus +5
    Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{hiraoka2026unified,
  title = {{A Unified Forearc Subsidence Model Based on the Three-Arc Unjoined Structure of the Honshu Arc}},
  author = {Yoshikazu Hiraoka},
  howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.31223/x5pz1n},
  url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/14842/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Unified Forearc Subsidence Model Based on the Three-Arc Unjoined Structure of the Honshu Arc
AU  - Yoshikazu Hiraoka
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/06
PB  - EarthArXiv
DO  - 10.31223/x5pz1n
UR  - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/14842/
AB  - This study reinterprets the subsidence, uplift, fault activity, and geomorphic development observed in the Nōbi Plain, Ise Bay, Lake Biwa, Wakasa Bay, and Osaka Bay through a new structural framework in which the Honshu Arc is understood as an incompletely joined system of three arcs. The Southwest Japan Arc (narrow sense), the Hida–Tamba Terrane, and the Northeast Japan Arc approached each other during the opening of the Japan Sea but never fully sutured. Their unjoined boundaries are exposed on the forearc side, forming Forearc Weak Suture Zones, where the weakness of accretionary complexes and the overlap of major fault zones concentrate subsidence, seismic shaking, and geomorphic reorganization. The Nōbi Plain lies within a Dual Weak Surface Structure, defined by the Yōrō Fault (inner weak surface) and the Biwa Western Margin–Rokko Fault Zone (outer weak surface), and is therefore interpreted not as a depositional basin but as a subsidence-dominated forearc basin. Ise Bay represents its southern continuation, forming a single forearc subsidence system. Lake Biwa occupies the northwestern end of the unjoined arc structure, while uplift along the Wakasa Bay coast is explained by three-sided tectonic confinement imposed by rigid crustal blocks. The continuous subsidence belt from Lake Biwa through the former Ogura Lake and Funo Basin to Osaka Bay defines the Kinki Subsidence Line, a western counterpart to the South Fossa Magna, effectively a “Second Fossa Magna.” This study demonstrates that the South Fossa Magna–Kanto Basin system and the Nōbi–Biwa–Osaka system are governed by the same forearc weak suture zone processes, thereby establishing a unified tectonic model for forearc subsidence in the Japanese Islands.
ER  -