Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,851 studies31 sourcesUpdated 53 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in immunology

Immunologic comparison of alpha-gal sensitized and non-sensitized groups from a community based sample

  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina , , ,
  2. 2Allergy & Immunology School of Medicine, University of North Carolina , , ,

Abstract

Introduction: Alpha-gal syndrome is delayed, IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to galactose-α-1, 3-galactose (alpha-gal), a carbohydrate epitope found in non-primate mammals. Sensitization is typically triggered by tick bites, with some sensitized individuals progressing to severe allergic reactions to red meat and other alpha-gal containing substances. Despite increasing clinical recognition, the immunologic mechanisms underlying alpha-gal sensitization remain poorly defined. Therefore, this article aimed to identify whether there are distinct immunologic differences between sensitized and non-sensitized groups sampled from a well-characterized, community-based cohort.

Methods: Participants were matched by age, sex, and race/ethnicity then classified as sensitized (AG+) or non-sensitized (AG−) by laboratory criteria. Demographics, health history, and target concentration between the groups were compared using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon tests, and multivariable logistic modeling.

Results: AG+ participants (n=50) showed elevated concentrations of innate immune markers including CD163, Chitinase-3-like 1, gp130, and MMP2 (all p < 0.0001), and reduced levels of regulatory cytokines including IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-35, LIGHT, and interferons IFNα2 and IFNβ. Logistic regression identified three independent cytokine predictors of alpha-gal sensitization: IL-1α (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.40–5.41, p = 0.004), IL-35 (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10–0.49, p < 0.001) and LIGHT (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05–0.75, p = 0.02).

Discussion: Our findings showed distinct differences between AG+ and AG- groups, marked by increased pro-inflammatory signaling and decreased immune regulatory cytokines. These results support a model of immune dysregulation involving both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system. Further research is needed to understand the functional role of these markers for those with clinical disease.

Related

  1. Olfaction, cognition, and early signs of neurodegenerative disease in a community-based sample of older adults
    Erin Jacobsen, Yingjin Zhang, Mary Ganguli +5
    Alzheimer disease and associated disordersPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurosciencePMC
  2. Revisiting Identification Thresholds of Specific Learning Disorders ( SLD ) in Gifted Children ( GC ). A Comparison of Three Groups: Twice‐Exceptional ( TE ) Children, GC Without SLD and Non‐ GC With SLD
    Laurent Lesecq, Laurent Querne, Julie Gornes +7
    DyslexiaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurosciencePsychiatry & mental healthHALEurope PMC
  3. Taxonomic classification cost tracks neither sequencing depth nor community richness at single-sample scale: a measured resource protocol for 16S rRNA amplicon pipelines
    S. Victor, S. Sadasivam, Y. S +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  4. ACTL7A Expression and Functional Characteristics of Sperm in Infertile Men: A Comparison Between High and Low DNA Damage Groups, A Cross Sectional Study
    Yeganeh Karimi, Bahareh Nikoozar, Marziyeh Tavalaee +4
    International Journal of Fertility & SterilityPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 3.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMC
  5. The Role of Immunologic Factors in Endometrial Receptivity: An Embryo–Endometrium Dialogue
    Evangelia Panagodimou, Ianthi Terzopoulou, Olga Triantafyllidou +5
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY5 citedImmunologyOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{pickle2026immunologic,
  title = {{Immunologic comparison of alpha-gal sensitized and non-sensitized groups from a community based sample}},
  author = {Emily Owens Pickle and Kyndall Dye-Braumuller and Kia Zellars and Stella C.W. Self and Scott Commins and Melissa S. Nolan},
  journal = {Frontiers in immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1824819},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13663876},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Immunologic comparison of alpha-gal sensitized and non-sensitized groups from a community based sample
AU  - Emily Owens Pickle
AU  - Kyndall Dye-Braumuller
AU  - Kia Zellars
AU  - Stella C.W. Self
AU  - Scott Commins
AU  - Melissa S. Nolan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Frontiers in immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1824819
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13663876
AB  - Introduction: Alpha-gal syndrome is delayed, IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to galactose-α-1, 3-galactose (alpha-gal), a carbohydrate epitope found in non-primate mammals. Sensitization is typically triggered by tick bites, with some sensitized individuals progressing to severe allergic reactions to red meat and other alpha-gal containing substances. Despite increasing clinical recognition, the immunologic mechanisms underlying alpha-gal sensitization remain poorly defined. Therefore, this article aimed to identify whether there are distinct immunologic differences between sensitized and non-sensitized groups sampled from a well-characterized, community-based cohort.  Methods: Participants were matched by age, sex, and race/ethnicity then classified as sensitized (AG+) or non-sensitized (AG−) by laboratory criteria. Demographics, health history, and target concentration between the groups were compared using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon tests, and multivariable logistic modeling.  Results: AG+ participants (n=50) showed elevated concentrations of innate immune markers including CD163, Chitinase-3-like 1, gp130, and MMP2 (all p < 0.0001), and reduced levels of regulatory cytokines including IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-35, LIGHT, and interferons IFNα2 and IFNβ. Logistic regression identified three independent cytokine predictors of alpha-gal sensitization: IL-1α (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 1.40–5.41, p = 0.004), IL-35 (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10–0.49, p < 0.001) and LIGHT (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05–0.75, p = 0.02).  Discussion: Our findings showed distinct differences between AG+ and AG- groups, marked by increased pro-inflammatory signaling and decreased immune regulatory cytokines. These results support a model of immune dysregulation involving both the innate and adaptive arms of the immune system. Further research is needed to understand the functional role of these markers for those with clinical disease.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -