Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYUltramicroscopy

Single photon emitters in hBN: Limitations of atomic resolution imaging and potential sources of error

Abstract

There is a growing interest in identifying the origin of single-photon emission in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), with proposed candidates including boron and nitrogen vacancies as well as carbon substitutional dopants. Because photon emission intensity often increases with sample thickness, hBN flakes used in these studies commonly exceed 30 atomic layers. To identify potential emitters at the atomic scale, annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (ADF-STEM) is frequently employed. However, due to the intrinsic AA’ stacking of hBN with vertically alternating boron and nitrogen atoms, this approach is complicated even in few-layer systems. Here, we demonstrate using STEM image simulations and experiments that, even under idealized conditions, the intensity differences between boron- and nitrogen-dominated columns and carbon substitutions become indistinguishable at thicknesses beyond 17 atomic layers (ca. 6 nm). While vacancy-type defects can remain detectable at somewhat larger thicknesses, also their detection becomes unreliable at thicknesses typically used in photonic studies. We further show that common residual aberrations, particularly threefold astigmatism, can lead to artificial contrast differences between columns, which may result in misidentification of atomic defects. We systematically study the effects of non-radially symmetric aberrations on multilayer hBN and demonstrate that even small residual threefold astigmatism can significantly distort the STEM contrast, leading to misleading interpretations. • Single atomic defects are not detectable with ADF-STEM in near-bulk hBN. • The appearance of B/N contrast in thick hBN samples is an artifact of aberrations. • Image processing, contamination and instrumental limitations have to be considered. • For proper correlation of atomic structures and optical properties advanced methodologies are needed.

Related

  1. Specimen-Dependent Sampling and Signal Limitations Govern the Effectiveness of Low-Magnification Super-Resolution in Cryo-EM
    C.-H. Wang, K.-P. Wu, Y. C. Chang
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  2. Detection and quantification of DNA double-strand breaks by genomic and imaging methods: a critical appraisal of capabilities and limitations
    Jurek Dobrucki, Maga Rowicka
    Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  3. Quantum-sensing-based super-resolution live cell microenvironment imaging
    Yuxian Lu, Yibo Yang, Ke Xu +8
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textBiophysicsCrossref
  4. Fully Two-Photon-Driven RESOLFT Microscopy for Super-Resolution Imaging inside Tissue
    R. Ozaki-Noma, H. Ishii, T. Wazawa +6
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBiophysicsbioRxiv
  5. Coffee-ring effect enables correlative super-resolution imaging of label-free chromosomes.
    Yanxin Dou, Valerie S T Goh, Thomas Osipowicz +1
    Journal of the Royal Society, InterfacePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textBiophysicsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{lamprecht2026single,
  title = {{Single photon emitters in hBN: Limitations of atomic resolution imaging and potential sources of error}},
  author = {David Lamprecht and Shrirang Chokappa and Alissa Freilinger and Barbara Maria Mayer and Maximilian Melchior and Jana Dzíbelová and Darwin Lorber and Luiz H.G. Tizei and Mathieu Kociak and Clemens Mangler and Lado Filipovic and Jani Kotakoski},
  journal = {Ultramicroscopy},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ultramic.2026.114318},
  eprint = {2511.03674},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05761689v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Single photon emitters in hBN: Limitations of atomic resolution imaging and potential sources of error
AU  - David Lamprecht
AU  - Shrirang Chokappa
AU  - Alissa Freilinger
AU  - Barbara Maria Mayer
AU  - Maximilian Melchior
AU  - Jana Dzíbelová
AU  - Darwin Lorber
AU  - Luiz H.G. Tizei
AU  - Mathieu Kociak
AU  - Clemens Mangler
AU  - Lado Filipovic
AU  - Jani Kotakoski
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/23
JO  - Ultramicroscopy
DO  - 10.1016/j.ultramic.2026.114318
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05761689v1
AB  - There is a growing interest in identifying the origin of single-photon emission in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), with proposed candidates including boron and nitrogen vacancies as well as carbon substitutional dopants. Because photon emission intensity often increases with sample thickness, hBN flakes used in these studies commonly exceed 30 atomic layers. To identify potential emitters at the atomic scale, annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (ADF-STEM) is frequently employed. However, due to the intrinsic AA’ stacking of hBN with vertically alternating boron and nitrogen atoms, this approach is complicated even in few-layer systems. Here, we demonstrate using STEM image simulations and experiments that, even under idealized conditions, the intensity differences between boron- and nitrogen-dominated columns and carbon substitutions become indistinguishable at thicknesses beyond 17 atomic layers (ca. 6 nm). While vacancy-type defects can remain detectable at somewhat larger thicknesses, also their detection becomes unreliable at thicknesses typically used in photonic studies. We further show that common residual aberrations, particularly threefold astigmatism, can lead to artificial contrast differences between columns, which may result in misidentification of atomic defects. We systematically study the effects of non-radially symmetric aberrations on multilayer hBN and demonstrate that even small residual threefold astigmatism can significantly distort the STEM contrast, leading to misleading interpretations. • Single atomic defects are not detectable with ADF-STEM in near-bulk hBN. • The appearance of B/N contrast in thick hBN samples is an artifact of aberrations. • Image processing, contamination and instrumental limitations have to be considered. • For proper correlation of atomic structures and optical properties advanced methodologies are needed.
SN  - 0304-3991
ER  -