Photobiomodulation for Pain, Healing, and Analgesic Use after Perineal Lacerations: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
- 1Institute of Motor Sciences, Physiotherapy, Federal University of Alfenas, Jovino Fernandes Sales Avenue, Alfenas, 2600 Brazil
- 2University of Campinas–School of Medical Sciences–Postgraduate Program in Surgical Science (UNICAMP)–Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
Introduction and Hypothesis: Approximately 60% of women experience some degree of perineal laceration following vaginal delivery. Although there is evidence supporting the use of photobiomodulation (PBM) for pain relief and wound healing in various conditions, there is a lack of studies on its effect on these lacerations. Our hypothesis is that PBM aids in pain management and healing in perineal lacerations/episiotomies in hospitalized women.
Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial in women with grade I/II lacerations and/or episiotomy, assigned to the intervention group (660 nm; 4 J) or placebo group (device turned off). Primary outcome was perineal pain at rest and during movements, measured using the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcome was healing, measured using the REEDA (redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, approximation) scale. Additionally, in-hospital analgesic consumption, self-perception of perineal laceration healing, and satisfaction with the intervention were analyzed. Analysis performed pre-intervention (6–12 h postpartum), post-intervention 1 (6–12 h post-first intervention), post-intervention 2 (12–18 h post-first intervention), and follow-up (7–15 days postpartum). Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis using the Mann–Whitney test.
Results: A total of 59 women participated (intervention 30; placebo 29), most of whom were primiparous. The intragroup analysis shows a reduction in perineal pain during rest and movements, with improved healing in both groups. No difference was observed in intergroup analysis. The intervention group consumed fewer analgesics and had a longer interval between doses than the placebo group.
Conclusion: Photobiomodulation (660 nm; 4 J) applied within 24 h postpartum, did not result in clinical improvement in pain or healing in women with perineal lacerations/episiotomies.
Related
- Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety between liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine for paravertebral block in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung tumor surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial
- Comparative evaluation of the antipyretic and analgesic efficacy and safety of a fast-release paracetamol 650 mg formulation vs. conventional paracetamol formulations in adults with acute febrile or febrile-pain conditions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
- Thermotherapy for prevention of perineal pain after vaginal birth: Evaluation of warm compresses and cold packs using a factorial randomized controlled trial
- Effects of 850-nm light-emitting diode photobiomodulation on pain intensity and dentin sialoprotein levels during canine distalization: A randomized controlled trial.
- Photobiomodulation versus stabilization splint, both combined with self-management, for acute temporomandibular myalgia: 48-week outcomes of a partially randomized controlled study
BibTeX
@article{castro2026photobiomodulation,
title = {{Photobiomodulation for Pain, Healing, and Analgesic Use after Perineal Lacerations: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial}},
author = {Thais de Castro and Laíza Helena Viana and Simone Botelho and Lígia Sousa Marino},
journal = {International Urogynecology Journal},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1007/s00192-026-06686-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06686-5},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Photobiomodulation for Pain, Healing, and Analgesic Use after Perineal Lacerations: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Thais de Castro
AU - Laíza Helena Viana
AU - Simone Botelho
AU - Lígia Sousa Marino
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/17
JO - International Urogynecology Journal
DO - 10.1007/s00192-026-06686-5
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06686-5
AB - Introduction and Hypothesis: Approximately 60% of women experience some degree of perineal laceration following vaginal delivery. Although there is evidence supporting the use of photobiomodulation (PBM) for pain relief and wound healing in various conditions, there is a lack of studies on its effect on these lacerations. Our hypothesis is that PBM aids in pain management and healing in perineal lacerations/episiotomies in hospitalized women. Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial in women with grade I/II lacerations and/or episiotomy, assigned to the intervention group (660 nm; 4 J) or placebo group (device turned off). Primary outcome was perineal pain at rest and during movements, measured using the numeric rating scale. Secondary outcome was healing, measured using the REEDA (redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, approximation) scale. Additionally, in-hospital analgesic consumption, self-perception of perineal laceration healing, and satisfaction with the intervention were analyzed. Analysis performed pre-intervention (6–12 h postpartum), post-intervention 1 (6–12 h post-first intervention), post-intervention 2 (12–18 h post-first intervention), and follow-up (7–15 days postpartum). Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis using the Mann–Whitney test. Results: A total of 59 women participated (intervention 30; placebo 29), most of whom were primiparous. The intragroup analysis shows a reduction in perineal pain during rest and movements, with improved healing in both groups. No difference was observed in intergroup analysis. The intervention group consumed fewer analgesics and had a longer interval between doses than the placebo group. Conclusion: Photobiomodulation (660 nm; 4 J) applied within 24 h postpartum, did not result in clinical improvement in pain or healing in women with perineal lacerations/episiotomies.
SN - 0937-3462
SN - 1433-3023
ER -